Reasons for change - medieval and early modern Britain
There were more limited changes to people’s health in medieval and early modern Britain in comparison with later periods. However, it would be unfair to say that attempts at improvement were not made. This case study summarises the main changes that took place in this period and examines the reasons for them.
Improvements to the urban environment
Medieval Britain
- There were many examples of town councils or guildAn association of craftsmen or merchants. trying to improve their towns.
- By 1500, York’s aldermen had banned people from dumping waste in the street and ordered businesses such as butchers and tannerA person who makes leather from animal hides. to move outside the city walls.
- public latrinesPublic toilets, often built on bridges, so that the waste could be taken away by the river. were built over rivers to carry sewage away. Dunghills were moved to the outskirts of towns.
- London introduced measures after the arrival of the Black Death. For example, in 1385, a warden was employed to ensure the streets and banks of the Thames were free of filth. In 1417, the city authorities closed the public baths during an outbreak of plague.
Early modern Britain
- The aldermen of York continued to make attempts to keep their city clean. For example, they ordered householders to clean the street outside their property twice a week. They also fined people for making dunghills in alleys.
- London took action on housing following the destruction of 10,000 houses during the Great Fire in 1666. Brick, tile, stone and other fireproof materials were used to rebuild houses. This meant that there were fewer rats in people’s homes. Some streets were widened.
- By the 18th century, outbreaks of plague had died down and towns were coping with growing populations and more carriages on the streets. Many introduced measures to make their centres more pleasant for their wealthier residents. For example, they introduced oil-burning lamps on the streets, paved their streets with stone, and built large terraced houses around big, open squares.
Question
Why were improvements made in the urban environment between c.1250 and c.1750?
- The impact of plague epidemics - There were attempts to keep towns clean and free from miasma.
- The disappearance of plague after 1670 - This meant town authorities could concentrate on making their environments more pleasant.
- Wealth and urbanisation - After plague died out, many towns were coping with an increased population and more carriages on the streets. They made changes to benefit their wealthier residents.
- The Great Fire of London - The 1666 fire presented London with an opportunity to guard against further fires. The authorities widened the streets and rebuilt houses in brick, tile, stone and other fireproof materials.
Action on plague
- In the medieval period, there was very little government action taken in response to the Black Death. Edward III ordered the mayor of London to clean the streets. He also ordered bishops to parade through towns and cities.
- However, by c.1750, there was a lot more government action.
- In 1518, Henry VIII introduced the policy of isolation in London.
- Elizabeth I’s ministers made use of the printing press to send the 1578 Plague Orders to local authorities all over England. The orders were posted on doors and in public places for people to read.
- The Plague Orders also ordered special prayers to be said in church and the burning of barrels of tar in the streets to clear smells.
Question
Why was there more action taken in response to outbreaks of plague in the early modern period than in the medieval period?
- The role of national government - Both Henry VIII and Elizabeth I involved themselves in public health in response to plague epidemics.
- Technology - The invention of the printing press meant that the 1578 Plague Orders could be copied and sent to local authorities across the country.
- Beliefs - More emphasis was placed on the idea that plague spread from person to person, so isolation was enforced.
Question
Why were the responses to plague ineffective in the medieval period (c.1250-c.1500) and the early modern period (c.1500-c.1750)?
- Beliefs - Across both periods, nobody understood the role of rats and fleas in the spread of the disease. People believed that God was punishing them, or that plague was spread through miasma. This led to a focus on ineffective responses, such as prayer and the burning of barrels of tar to clear smells.
Action on gin
- Cheap gin became a big problem in towns. Crime went up, families were fell into poverty and there was an increase in the death rate.
- There were campaigns from individuals, charities and Members of Parliament about the impact of gin.
- In 1729, 1736, 1743 and 1751, Parliament passed laws to try to control the gin trade.
- The 1751 Gin Act was the toughest. It introduced tight restrictions on who was allowed to sell gin, along with harsh punishments for anyone caught selling gin illegally.
Question
Why was effective action against excessive gin drinking in place by 1751?
- Poverty and social problems - Cheap gin was a quick escape from the problems of a hard life for millions of people. By the 1720s it had become a serious problem in London, with an increase in crime and the death rate. Various groups and individuals placed pressure on government to take action.
- National government action - Only the harsh action of the 1751 Gin Act finally got the problem under control. Gin drinking had fallen considerably by 1760.