After a day of horror in Beirut, it's hard to know what Israel's long-term strategy ispublished at 07:23 BST
Hugo Bachega
Middle East correspondent, reporting from Beirut
Image source, ReutersThe aftermath of an Israeli strike on Beirut, seen on Thursday
The morning after Israel’s bombs brought horror and destruction to this city, Beirut is quiet.
President Joseph Aoun described it as a “massacre”, and the government announced that today would be a public holiday, to mourn those who were killed.
For 10 minutes, at around 14:00 here, the whole country came under attack.
The Israeli military said more than 100 air strikes were carried out on what it described as Hezbollah targets. Busy, densely populated residential areas were hit, and Israel knew that this would inevitably lead to a high number of casualties.
According to the Lebanese health ministry, at least 182 people were killed, a number that is likely to be higher, and 890 wounded.
It is difficult to see what the long-term Israeli strategy is.
Even Israeli military officials acknowledge what has been known in Lebanon for a long time: that Hezbollah will not be disarmed by force.
The attacks may give Israel some military gain, but this is likely to be limited.
Meanwhile, opponents and supporters of the group are coming together in their anger and criticism of Israel, united in their view that what happened here was unacceptable and unjustifiable.














