Main content

How to avoid overcooking a food story: 10 tips for reporting nutritional science

Fiona Lethbridge

is senior press officer for the Science Media Centre

This post was co-written with Fiona Fox of the Science Media Centre.

In a previous blog we looked at some of the pitfalls in reporting food science in the light of some recent media fiascos.

On a positive note, for journalists looking for handy hints for reporting food science, here are some guidelines drawn up by the Science Media Centre and a group of science journalists.

Delicious BBC canteen lunch

Our top 10 tips:

  • State the source of the story - e.g. interview, conference, journal article, a survey from a charity or trade body etc, ideally with enough information for readers to look it up or a web link
  • Specify the size and nature of the study - e.g. who/what were the subjects, how long did it last, what was tested, or was it an observation? If space, mention the major limitations
  • When reporting a link between two things, indicate whether or not there is evidence that one causes the other
  • Give a sense of the stage of the research - e.g. cells in a laboratory or trials in humans - and a realistic timeframe for any new treatment or technology
  • On health risks, include the absolute risk whenever it is available in the press release or the research paper - i.e. if ‘cupcakes double cancer risk’ state the outright risk of that cancer, with and without cupcakes
  • Especially on a story with public health implications, try to frame a new finding in the context of other evidence - e.g. does it reinforce or conflict with previous studies? If it attracts serious scientific concerns, they should not be ignored
  • If there’s space, quote both the researchers themselves and external sources with appropriate expertise. Be wary of scientists and press releases over-claiming for studies
  • Distinguish between findings and interpretation or extrapolation; don’t suggest health advice if none has been offered
  • Remember the public: reading in the newspaper that something is ‘good for you’ or ‘bad for you’ can lead to behavioural change - make sure it’s evidence-based!
  • Headlines should not mislead the reader about a story’s contents and quotation marks should not be used to dress up overstatement.

There's more about reporting in the Academy website's section on journalism skills

Blog comments will be available here in future. Find out more.