Can mass evictions be justified?

The plans, which include the demolition of slums on the waterfront, are part of the government's "Greater Port Harcourt master plan".
The local government hopes to develop the area to create jobs, stimulate the local economy and build better roads - all of it urgently needed.
Forced evictions regularly spark demonstrations there and police have even fired live rounds at protesters. Several civilians have been killed.
Forced evictions are common across the continent, with governments often citing urban development as the reason for them. But can they ever be justified?
To take part in our LIVE debate on air at 1600GMT message us your number. It will not be published.
Comment number 1.
At 15:37 28th Oct 2010, Elizabeth Kuranchie-Mensah wrote:I do really have problem with the concerned authorities.Before the people settled,what did they tell them? They are not going to relocate but evict them which is quite sad and I believe the people wouldn't take it easy,and so they will definitely protest.I think they should relocate them.[Personal details removed by Moderator]
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 16:13 28th Oct 2010, Just_saying wrote:Am confused. Africa is usually portrayed as ridden with slums and sub-human living conditions. But now, this article is complaining that the government in Nigeria wants to clean up those areas. Are we saying the government should not aspire to make Port Harcourt a beautiful city?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 17:29 28th Oct 2010, AKPAN wrote:As with most decisions taken by any government, you could argue that this can only be to the good of those concerned. But as with anything the Nigerian government does, you only need to scratch the surface to reveal a cruel scam of one sort or another. I have visited the slums and know a few people who live there. The fact that any government would allow it (or indeed, any similar hell-hole) to exist says a lot about the character of the individuals serving in that so-called government. So, on the surface, you could argue that anything is better than such places. But the tragic reality is that those wretched souls will literally be kicked out to make way for swanky new waterfront apartments for those with much stolen wealth in their pockets - without any thought given to where they should go next. It happened only a few years back - in Lagos.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 17:33 28th Oct 2010, Chukwudozie Duru wrote:Force eviction is not justified in any sense unless in a situation of probable cause. however i believe that a redevelopment plan is not a force eviction and people must have been served notices before now.
It will be very bad of the government to wake up one morning and start demolishing peoples' houses without prior notices and proper compensation . There should be a peoper arrangement for traffic flow in all major road in and out of Portharcourt because these dsiplaced individuals will now go to suburban arears of the Portharcourt to seek for accommodation.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 17:43 28th Oct 2010, Sam wrote:Mass eviction can not be justified, it is a way for the government official to occupy and do the "bussiness as usual", sell the land to those who stole ahead of them. even if buildings are erected, it will still go those who are connected, the politicians
This is another means of stealing from the poor to pay the rich few.
The oil-rich land in Nigeria have always been in the news for over 20 years, but that is it, no positive effect on the poor, the less priviledged, the un-educated and the land itself.
so, who really cares?
is it UN, WHO or OAU? or could it be the educated Nigerians, who will rather sell "Nigeria" (the whole country) for them to buy a piece of property in UK or USA? even the local people care less, as long as you can give them some cash that will give them "pride" over fellow Nigerians for a few days.
Those that cares are the "big corporations" - Shell, Elf, Chevron, Agip and others - that they see the situation as opportunities for them to rake more cash in billions, if not trillions, as they impoverish the land the more.
But guess what, this is their season, their time, of the big corporations, another season will come someday
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 17:51 28th Oct 2010, Adekunle Adeniran wrote:It is actually a devasting thing to be homeless but on the other hand, those people should not have been there in the fist place. If it was approved by someone in the local government, then, they should not be punished for in ept govenment official. If not, the government is justified for demolition. The slums breeds thuggery, vagabonds and societal ills.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 20:41 28th Oct 2010, Benjamin Addai Antwi-Boasiako wrote:When our African brothers illegally get to Europe and the law enforcement agencies there deal with them according to law, we (Africans) are quick to condemn the Europeans and demand that they should deal with the law-breakers with 'a human face'. If we expect Europeans to deal with our brothers who have broken their laws with some dignity, the least we can do to our fellow countrymen is to find alternative accommodation for these people if we must evict them. Who wouldn't want to stay in a mansion in a plush area? These people stay there not because they want to, but because they have to as a result of bad policies (e.g. the neglect of our rural areas) that successive governments implement.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 22:28 28th Oct 2010, Kingsley O wrote:Of course mass eviction is justified as long as legitimate landowners are duly compensated. I say legitimate landowners because squatters are not entitled to compensation. Goverments around the globe excercise their eminent domain right all the time.
Amnesty International and other NGOs should be working with the appropriate authorities to provide affordable housing and not simply condemn development effort. Nigeria and the rest of African countries should have a well-planned development instead of the current situation of mansions sitting right next door to slums, ghettoes or shanty towns.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 23:30 28th Oct 2010, simon wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 23:59 28th Oct 2010, Joe Bridgehouse wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)
Comment number 11.
At 09:14 29th Oct 2010, blueogre wrote:Mass evictions are inevitable if urban development is ever to be achieved but it must be done right. Knowing Nigerians I suspect they were given adequate notice to vacate but as we know they were perhaps waiting for 'The Lord' to intervene. I know legitimate property owners will be adequately compensated. Those who are crying blue murder are the illegal occupants who have neither a certificate of ownership nor a tenancy agreement. These are the people who build on railway lines and flood planes and on roads; they are paying the price for their inability to follow due process. Poverty is not always a good enough excuse, respect the authorities.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 11)
Comment number 12.
At 17:45 29th Oct 2010, Andy Ateli wrote:Making a decision without taking into account the consequences of the action either by underming or ignoring is practically unjust. There should have been a plan B in terms of temporal accomodation for the tenants. You cannot pay off the landlords and forget about the tenants. That is inhuman and evidence of insensitive government of Nigeria.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 12)
Comment number 13.
At 16:10 31st Oct 2010, Renaissance wrote:In this situation i don't blame anybody both the government and the masses,we need change,nigeria need development,in order to accomplish this, few heads must roll and this heads must be celebrated as heros in order to balance the situation, if not the matter of justificatio will arise.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 13)
Comment number 14.
At 05:30 1st Nov 2010, aghaunor sunday wrote:Truly speaking mass eviction is painful especially when there are no plans in place to caretar for the evicted,and when government also renege in their plans for carrying out mass eviction,evidence abound that government plans for evicting are merely smokescreen it ends up as a white elephant projects.so to justify mass eviction the authorities should create an alternative for those who are to be evicted before they embark on it.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 14)
Comment number 15.
At 15:01 2nd Nov 2010, Russeleoin wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 15)