BBC HomeExplore the BBC
This page has been archived and is no longer updated. Find out more about page archiving.

16 October 2014

Peatstack


BBC Homepage
Scotland
ยปIsland Blogging
Western Isles

Baleshare
Barra
Benbecula
Bernera
Berneray
Canna
Eigg
Eriskay
Grimsay
Harris
Lewis
Muck
North Uist
Raasay
Rum
Scalpay
Skye
Soay
South Uist
Vatersay

Argyll & Clyde Islands
Northern Isles

Contribute
House Rules

From the BBC
I.B.H.Q.

Contact Us

Schools Closure - A Creative Interpretation of The Curriculum for Excellence

More evidence today that at the very heart of the problems we face with the future of education in the Outer Hebrides is a lack of leadership, direction and creativity in the highest ranks of the Comhairle.
This morning we learn (from BBC Radio News for The Highlands & Islands) that the Comhairle are to ask the minister for education in Scotland to explain to them her comments - made in the Islands weeks and weeks ago - that there is no incompatibility between the S1/2 Units in our schools and the new Curriculum for Excellence.
The minister made these comments because that is a fundamental truth about the new Curriculum. In reality it is more a philosophical and aspirational tract than a new hard-wired replacement curriculum, and is open to wide and creative interpretation. One example given in a previous post to this blog, is the idea that the new curriculum is actually designed to remove the strict aged / year-base to learning, and in fact would be a good basis to extend the current S1/2 units to become S1-3 units.
Locally, the new curriculum could and should mean embracing the many excellent qualities of our schools and schooling, and utilising the new curriculum to cement the many positive aspects of small, village school education - especially in terms of their community base and spirtitual education (I don't mean theology or RE by this but something far wider), and the way in which these schools create confident, self-assured young people - factors absolutely central to the new curriculum.
But no, we won't do this in the Islands, not in the Outer Hebrides, it seems our (meaning the highest ranks of councillor) interpretation of the curriculum means we must centralise and unify our schooling destroying anything unique and rooted in the community,and we seem to be destined to be led by sheep rather than real leaders prepared to defend and extend our values and culture.
Instead, of course, they'll gladly rub their hands together and condemn those who favour ferries on a Sunday - that's easy pickings - but when it comes to really working to defend this place and its culture by standing up against central government - their high words suddenly disappear.
Frankly, I worry for the future prosperity of these islands when the council is so weak and reactive. Why not go to Edinburgh and really tell the Minister how we are going to embrace and implement the new curriculum locally within the existing structure of schools and schooling rather than flouncing about waiting to be told?

Posted on Peatstack at 10:23

Comments

Fear is the key here. Fear of doing the wrong thing for the right reasons, or fear of doing the right thing for the wrong reasons. When I went to secondary school on the mainland, I had to travel on 2 buses to get to school, meaning that I had to leave the house at 7:15 am each morning that I went to school. Having primary education very local is a good thing, but I'm not so sure about secondary education, lots of other kids travel distances to and from school, so why should our kids be different? I doubt the quality of education would suffer too much, and may mean that more money can be spent on the NI, which can't be a bad thing. We choose to live on an island, there is good and bad points about island living, and sometimes we have to think of the better good for the WHOLE community. Of course I could be wrong, but that is my humble opinion.

Tws from Out Of School


I agree with Tws. Primary schools should be within easy reach, but by the time children get to secondary stage, they are better going to one well-run big school with all the resources available, than some junior secondary tacked on to a primary and with limited resources.

Flying Cat from edu-cat


Thanks for these comments, although, obviously I disagree with their content, I think we need to have a debate about this as a whole community - not just as parents or others with vested interests - to find a long term answer to the questions of how we address declining populations (in some parts) and reduced resources (and how we use them).

The Peatstack from In The Janny's Shed


I must agree with Tws and Flying Cat. Resources would be better spent on one well run and up to date school with all the facilities it needs instead of trying to share out what little money is available between many small units all ending up under funded

lochs from lochs


I have to say you can't put all the secondary's facing closure in the same bag. Ours although in the same building and not 'tacked' on has had a newly fitted science lab and smart boards throughout. The issue is leaders spending funds well throughout all the islands. If you have a high performing local secondary with all mod cons why would you close it. I am new to this blog so it is only an opinion.

On The Edge from North Uist


I like opinions. Lots of 'em. But was it worth the investment?

Flying Cat from falling rolls


Well for the future of North Uist the investment is certainly worth it. We only have falling rolls for 3 years and then numbers shoot up again. We are in the middle of a baby boom, a real one with loads of babies and toddlers all over North Uist. If we want to keep the young people on our island we need long term planning and investment not short term financial gain and panic from those who decide. People do like well run, high performing schools with modern technology on their own island. We are funny like that on North Uist!?! No I didn't mean funny like THAT... although you all know we are! All joking aside schools should be shut because they are failing the local population not because our elected officials are incompetent and failing our children. All schools and areas are different and can not be treated as one because they are in the Western Isles and it suits the council. It needs to be what is right for the local children and their needs. You might, just, be able to tell that I have a child who may be adversely effected by the proposed school closures... or was I being subtle?!?

Living on the edge from Sollas


I'm glad someone, apart from the socially excluded and damaged are having lots of babies. And in such a lovely place too. Perhaps you could share the secret with Lewis where breeding women are thin on the ground and the men are....well...who knows.

Flying Cat from remembering Murdo John on AnnieB @ the usual


Remind me again: what's the use of edoocashun? # Seriously, you don't need the latest technology to have a good education. Ask Hyper-B.(maybe): all you need are disciplined kids who want to learn and competent teachers. Give me some old fashioned Catholic schools .... (nostalgia is not always a bad thing).

mjc from NM, USA


Slates and chalk: dipping pens and spilled inkwells: lukewarm milk by the radiator: the tawse: ah those were the days...

Flying Cat from newspaper in my boots


Subsequent events and letters from the Government seem to have supported the Comhairle's position. What I want to know is why is our MSP supporting the Government's position rather than trying to get the best deal for the islands?

Murdo from Stornoway


Good question Murdo, I had would have thought the MSP would be straight in making his stand clear to the First Minister, and where and how are the Government supporting the Comhairle? Must have missed that one.

The Peatstack from Training for the next whisky olympics


I m afraid Murdo you must have misunderstood what is coming from the Government. From all the communication I have seen they support rural schools and believe the curriculum for excellence is well suited to the middle secondary schools as it is an idea rather than fixed practical targets and some of our S1 and S2s can meet the curriculum with a bit of help. The Council also can not close schools if there is not another secondary within 10 miles unless there is agreed closure between the parents, Council and Government. I dont know what you have been hearing but as a parent I have yet to get my promised packet of information or meeting with the head of Education at the Council. But those without children can debate party politics and pretend that information backs their side of the story when the bottom line is good schools should not be shut for short term financial gain.

Living on the edge from Murdo


I'm pretty sure we had children once...

Flying Cat from the back of the bus


Sorry about that I think I meant... but I am not sure.... that people who do not have children in the schools under the ax may find it easier to use it as a political football as it does not impact their children or area. But then I probably offended those who have kittens instead of kids by saying this!!???!

Living on the edge from Uist


Local education is worth striving for. With imagination and good will, a handful of gung ho and knowledgeable teachers, small schools even for the later grades should be in the domain of the possible, given properly developed long distance learning (real time classes on the internet). Too much time can be spent commuting to school, and I am not terribly enamored of the idea of residential middle and high schools, whether publicly funded or private. Time enough for the kids to go away, separate from the parents, when they are off to university.

mjc from NM,USA




This blog is now closed and we are no longer accepting new posts.



About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy