BBC HomeExplore the BBC
This page has been archived and is no longer updated. Find out more about page archiving.

16 October 2014

Peatstack


BBC Homepage
Scotland
»Island Blogging
Western Isles

Baleshare
Barra
Benbecula
Bernera
Berneray
Canna
Eigg
Eriskay
Grimsay
Harris
Lewis
Muck
North Uist
Raasay
Rum
Scalpay
Skye
Soay
South Uist
Vatersay

Argyll & Clyde Islands
Northern Isles

Contribute
House Rules

From the BBC
I.B.H.Q.

Contact Us

Peat cutting and CO2 emissions

I returned home a few hours ago after spending the morning tending to my peats. Good progress, though ground very wet. Some (especially the monadh dubh) are ready to come home, others still need some drying time. The moor was empty, save for myself, a few noisy skuas and the occasional piping of a plover. At one time, on a morning like this, the moor would have seen many a person out at their peats. In my home village now though, there is only a handful of households still cutting the peats, yet all around us remains the evidence of a time when peat cutting was a vital part of the year's work. Hard graft but also with a communal and social aspect that many miss, and many will still say that a day at the peats is hard to beat.

The reasons for the decline in peat cutting are many - relative prosperity, the coming of the electric and oil-fired heating systems, population change etc. But I suspect that concern for environmental damage is pretty rare as a reason why many have given up peat cutting, and rightly so. As a subscriber to the view that the crofting life (when widespread and part of the survival of the crofter) was an intrinsically environmentally friendly form of land and animal management, I am bound of course to say that today's concerns about peat cutting and CO2 release is fundamentally misguided.

Environmentally damaging mistakes have been made in the recent history of crofting - including the widespread use of chemical fertilisers, pesticides - and the recourse to machine cutting of peat in some areas. But I believe that hand peat-cutting for solely domestic usage should be encouraged in the interests of the environment.

At present, in a relatively few years - in the post war period - the islands of Lewis and Harris have gone from being quite self-sufficient in terms of fuel, heat, light to being highly dependent on imported fuels - especially oil. That oil is brought into the islands in container ships, and the environmental damage caused by the freighting of fuel via road and sea is surely very substantial. Lewis also has fossil-fuel powered electricity generation, and a liking for bottled gas as a means of fuel for cooking.

This blogger would like to see the development of a sustainable energy and fuel plan and policy for the outer islands based on principles of sustainability and self-sufficiency - and a move towards greater wind and wave power along with sustainable use of our in-situ solid fuels - peat etc.

I could support the developemnt of wind turbines if the power they generated was for island use alone. Why should we ruin our landscape for the sake of meeting the ever increasing and unsustainable demands for (cheap) energy in the rest of the UK? The principle for self-sufficiency and sustainability would remove the need for the costly grid interconnector and pylons and all of its blighting of the Highland landscape.

Therefore, before commenting in isolation on notions of environmental damage and CO2 emission etc, remote, charities and think-tanks should examine the use of peat in the broader context of environmental damage caused by our existing use of all fuels types and sources, and our plans for the future of the islands as a platform for energy generation / export, while we, as communities, remain a heavily dependent energy and fuel importer.


Posted on Peatstack at 13:06

Comments

at last someone on ib who has the same ecological thoughts as i have,continue!

carol from 36°in the shade


I hate to be boring, but I agree with you all the way Peatstack. If the islanders wanted to set up some windylights to produce community power, well and good, but 181 of the things striding over Barvas Moor to produce power for conurbations, no.

Flying Cat from Orkney Mainland


Didn't you used to have a band called "The Raeburns"?

Hyper-Borean from The Torvhaug


While not knowing much about peat as a fuel, I do often wonder why such crafts are going out of favour. I would have thought that the exercise involved in cutting and gathering peat would help the fight against obesity, and, as with wood, it heats twice ... once with the cutting and gathering and then as a fuel. Is this progress?

Plaid from Outback Oz


Ive cut my first peats this year . As an incomer i did find it a steep learning curve but rewarding one of my reasons are financial im all solid fuel and the price of coal is increasing and wont get any cheaper with only 1 supplier now so what ever i cut is a great saving for me. I also agree with all whats been said above

incomer from lewis


Been casting some peats with my man ( piccies on my blog!) hoping to get the knack sometime soon ( it's harder than it looks) he puts me to shame....he's one of the folk that would still choose a day on the peat hill over a multitude of other things....says it's the only place he can go to empty his head!!

Musings from needing an early night.....


Peatstack, I have to agree with you. Although solar, wind and sea provide "cleaner" energy, this energy is not currently very transportable, it requires large investments in infrastructure to move it from place to place. It also don't lend itself to being stored. Peat on the other hand requires little investment, little infrastructure, and can be transported and stored easily. I believe research should be done on how to leverage these attributes, while getting the most energy out of peat, while producing the least amount of CO2, and airborne particulate matter. Bruce

CVBruce from CA, USA


What a great post. Most impressed and agree with you all the way. Much more important than producing more energy is the need for us all to use energy and resources much less and with love and care.

Alpinia from Lewis


If we used what we have more wisely we wouldnt need more of anything. Why the lack of effort on wave and tide power - which is always there and has a certain timetable - I'll tell you why - its a lot harder to sort out. Wind Turbines are easy - thats why them that knows want a lot of them. Them that knows never live within sight of them though.

Crofterbill from the edge of time


Thanks for the comments. Shame that it seems that the Lewis wind farm is a 'done deal' when many people feel it to be wrong. I was in Barra recently and heard a very good comment, that when it came to a vote in the Comhairle (local council) on this issue only those councillors from wards that would house these turbines should have voted, the other should have abstained. It remains a shame that in recent times the problems of economic and population decline in the islands have been met with just one answer - large- scale industrial development that would blight the landscape. We were only just over the horror of the proposed super-quarry in Harris (all the same promises of a golden tomorrow) when this new power station (that is what it is) came along!

Peatstack from Lewis


It's not a 'done deal' at all. Keep fighting it all the way.

Turbinia from Isle of Lewis




This blog is now closed and we are no longer accepting new posts.



About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy