Oscar Pistorius (left) and Jub Jub (right)
Following the acquittal of Oscar Pistorius on his murder charge, critics are comparing his case to another famous South African murder trial.
In 2012, the rapper Molemo "Jub Jub" Maarohanye was convicted of murder and attempted murder after driving into a group of schoolchildren.
He had been racing on a public road while high on cocaine and morphine.
Jub Jub killed four children and was convicted of murder. Pistorius killed his girlfriend and was acquitted.
Many South Africans have taken to twitter, suggesting that despite being high on drugs and drag racing his sports car, Jub Jub had no intention to kill.
The comparison being, they say, that this is why Pistorius was acquitted of a murder charge.
The athlete was instead found guilty of culpable homicide (manslaughter), while Jub Jub was found guilty of murder.
Jub Jub was sentenced to 20 years in jail while Pistorius will face a maximum of 15 years, though it's expected to be less than that.
Judge Thokozile Masipa said the former-Paralympian acted "negligently" when he fired shots through a toilet door, but that he did it in the "belief that there was an intruder".
She said the state had failed to prove he had intended to kill Reeva, "or anyone else for that matter."
But that hasn't stopped the debate in South Africa. Comedian Trevor Noah is one of those who's questioned the judgement.
He tweeted: "If you're going to kill someone in South Africa, use a gun, not a Mini Cooper."
Many people have tweeted suggesting Jub Jub should now be offered a re-trial, based on the legal precedent set by this case.
But plenty have said the cases shouldn't be compared at all.
The trial of Oscar Pistorius shone a light on South African justice system which has often come in for criticism, and it seems that is likely to continue.
Follow @BBCNewsbeat, external on Twitter and Radio1Newsbeat, external on YouTube.
