Tuesday July 7th
Wow! How devious is Alex? Last time Brian was seen in Shieldinch he crashed a stolen car, killing his poor gran Moira, and this was after he'd kidnapped his step-sister Hazel and kept her locked in a cellar over Christmas! Glad to see he's doing better now though!
And will Amber get the message about Innes? He's obviously not interested- or is he? What do you think and what did you think about tonight's episode?

Comment number 1.
At 23:44 7th Jul 2009, lesley wrote:Felt so sorry for Raymond tonight being back in the ship, but without Shona their to run it with him.But having Brian back seemed to cheer him up which was good.Speak about when the cats away the mice will play, what next will Amber get up too.Had a good laugh with the interview for a new hairdressing assistant, very funny.Poor Bob, why doesnt he just tell Nicky how he really feels about her. Im sure they would make a great couple and would be happy together.What a nasty piece of work that Alex is, poor Eileen is certainly having a bad time of it but now after what he did she will certainly fight back, and good on her. Me thinks that Lenny is up for his come uppance again due to that notice about the ground being unsuitable to build on ha ha, serves him right.He thinks he can get off with everything but not for long.Cant wait till next weeks episode, should be very interesting.River city improves every week, fair enjoying it.Thanks BBC for such an enjoyable programme its simply the best.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 21:01 15th Jul 2009, diane-n wrote:Last night's episode was fab. It was great to hear Amber rhyming off Depeche Mode lyrics and then the song being played later. Poor girl hasn't got a clue! Dave Gahan would have been so proud - Depeche Mode on River City!!!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 22:03 16th Jul 2009, wic2007 wrote:The scenes with father and son were brilliant and it's like RC has come full circle in more ways than one.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)