BBC Trust publishes Licence Reviews
The BBC Trust has today published its Licence Reviews of BBC One, BBC Two and BBC Four, setting out the role and purpose of the channels for the next five years. These reviews are designed to ensure that the channels are delivering the BBC’s public purposes and providing audiences with the kind of programming they want and expect.
I have written to BBC staff today to explain the findings of the reviews and what they mean to us as programme makers. You can read my letter below. It also contains a link to the Trust reviews. The reviews show that the channels are performing very well but also give us a good indication of what we can do more of.
_____________________________________________
Dear all,
Today the BBC Trust has published its Licence Reviews of BBC One, BBC Two and BBC Four, setting out the role and purpose of the channels for the next five years. These form part of the Trust's regular reviews of all BBC services. As part of the process, we submit reports for each channel that analyse their performance against the Public Purposes and describe our strategy going forward. The BBC Trust also canvasses the views of licence fee payers and the wider industry. You can read the Trust's final conclusions here.
Today's announcements follow the publication of the Trust's interim findings in the summer, which strongly supported the direction of the channels and asked for more detailed plans in a few key areas. Since then, we have been working closely with the Trust, and the positive conclusions of today's report should be seen as an endorsement of the strength and ambition of our plans to deliver even greater quality and originality across our full range of programmes and content.
Overall, the Trust concludes that the BBC's TV portfolio is performing very strongly - on reach, quality and value for money measures, as well as playing a central role in delivery of the Public Purposes to audiences across the UK. The BBC's portfolio of television channels has increased both its reach and share over the past year, more than any other broadcaster. Our audiences tell us that BBC channels lead over other channels for their quality, originality and distinctiveness. Shows currently on-air like Strictly Come Dancing, The Trip, Getting On and Wallace and Gromit's World of Invention demonstrate this in practice. But there are a number of themes which are important to all of us.
Audiences continue to have a strong appetite for "fresh and new ideas" on television. This is a reflection of the TV industry more broadly - and expectations are rightly highest when it comes to the BBC. We will be taking the leading role in meeting audience expectations here by always aiming for the highest quality and distinctiveness.
The BBC's television portfolio is focusing on a number of areas:
• On BBC One, we will seek to bring even greater range and variety into peak, building on a very strong base - programmes like Sherlock, Bang Goes the Theory, Five Daughters and Outnumbered to name but a few.
• BBC Two will implement its plans in factual, drama and comedy to reaffirm its position as the mainstream, highly distinctive alternative to BBC One. Shows like Wonders of the Solar System, The Normans and Renaissance Revolution, plus new dramas like The Shadow Line, and comedies such as Whites and Rev are strong examples of how it will do this.
• BBC Four will seek to achieve even greater impact and credit for high quality, highly original pieces like the First Men in The Moon, The Secret Life of the National Grid and Michael Wood's Story of England, and the forthcoming series The Art of Germany.
• In Daytime we have already made great headway, and the Review acknowledges this and supports our plans for the future. We are introducing high quality current affairs and consumer journalism into the schedule with programmes like Rip Off Britain, Saints and Scroungers and Crimewatch Roadshow, alongside new dramas including Jimmy McGovern's Moving On and The Indian Doctor with Sanjeev Bhaskar. We will continue on this journey of refreshment to ensure our services offer the UK's most distinctive programming for daytime viewers.
• Across all of our programmes, we will seek to reflect the diversity of the UK's people, cultures, regions and communities back to our audiences, and work to provide value to all audience groups. The report reinforces the importance of our opt-out programming from the Nations and Regions - but challenges us to deliver even greater quality and impact for these programmes.
I welcome the framework provided by the five year service licences for these channels, which sit alongside BBC Three's service licence agreed last year. They are an endorsement of our plans and creative ambitions for the next five years. Along with the certainty of an agreed licence fee settlement, they place our portfolio of television channels in a strong and positive position so that we can continue to produce the very best television services in the UK.
Jana Bennett is Director of BBC Vision


Comment number 1.
At 12:02 8th Nov 2010, Kit Green wrote:I must say that I find much of the output of BBC Four to be of a surprisingly good standard considering how low the budgets seem to be. This goes to show that interesting content is still offered to the viewer without having to resort to fashion and gloss.
As an example of what I mean by "surprisingly good standard considering" I really enjoyed Story of England, but I considered the title graphics to be appalling and the sound mix was all over the place. As the series was so well executed apart from this I presume that the budget had been used up before these areas were completed!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 20:10 8th Nov 2010, U14679933 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 22:09 8th Nov 2010, TV Licence fee payer against BBC censorship wrote:"Our audiences tell us that BBC channels lead over other channels for their quality, originality and distinctiveness. Shows currently on-air like Strictly Come Dancing, The Trip, Getting On and Wallace and Gromit's World of Invention demonstrate this in practice."
Well that depends, if they want a tax funded version of just about any commercial broadcaster or if they want a tax funded broadcaster that does all the things that the commercial broadcasters can't do because of their need to sell advertising - perhaps the BBC are asking the wrong (minority) section of the audience if they think that the BBC should be joining the 'race to the bottom', that is taking place in the commercial sector...
With the exception of the specialised BBC Parliament channel, BBC Four is now the only BBC channel that I recognise as having any true PSB values, making/screening programmes that could never see the light of day in the commercial sector. The BBC's only true measure of success should be excellence, not what the ratings figures show, indeed the ratings should be the of the least important measure of success.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 14:50 9th Nov 2010, kruador wrote:@Boilerplated: the problem of your argument is that it is not a *minority* section of the audience, far from it. The 10 most watched programmes from 25 to 31 October on BBC One were Strictly (x2), EastEnders (x4), New Tricks, Countryfile (Autumn Special), Merlin and The Apprentice. If the BBC does not produce *popular* programmes, they will lose general public support for the whole idea of publicly-funded broadcasting and the budgets will reduce to the point that your idea of public-service broadcasting simply won't be possible.
What the BBC has to do is to inject PSB values into even the most populist programmes, to educate and inform at the same time as entertaining. EastEnders is just too sensational for my taste, and I don't think it really hits a large number of educational or informative storylines, so that needs more work, in my view - but there's no point running such storylines if no-one's watching the programme.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 05:59 27th Nov 2010, Firesleeve wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 22:15 7th Dec 2010, TV Licence fee payer against BBC censorship wrote:4. At 2:50pm on 09 Nov 2010, kruador wrote:
"If the BBC does not produce *popular* programmes, they will lose general public support for the whole idea of publicly-funded broadcasting and the budgets will reduce to the point that your idea of public-service broadcasting simply won't be possible."
Then there really is no point in having a publicly funded BBC, if the BBC has to act as if it is a commercial broadcaster - cloning the (typical) content of such channels - then it really should be competing with and not strangling the competition... You have put forward a very good argument for the total abolition of the BBC, or at least its method of funding!
Sorry but I don't share the opinion that the average members of the public are not able to understand the difference between, and the need for, PSB programming and programmes made solely for the ability to maximise the ratings/income and why both need different funding methods.
Regards, the erstwhile "Biolerplated"
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)