Religion on the BBC
On Wednesday this week, the Church Of England's Synod will debate a motion tabled by Nigel Holmes on the issue of religious broadcasting on television. The motion says coverage that was, "once exemplary, now marginalises the few such programmes which remain" and "completely ignored the Christian significance of Good Friday 2009". In a background paper that accompanies this motion, Nigel says the hours of religious and ethical TV broadcast on the BBC have fallen from 177 in 1987, to 155 in 2007.
Ahead of the Synod, the Sunday Telegraph did an interview with me that explored these issues. The article appeared on Sunday under the headline "Church is 'living in the past' says BBC chief". Great headline - but the truth lets the story down. The problem is: I am that BBC chief and I definitely didn't say that. In fact there were a lot of things in the Sunday Telegraph article that surprised me when I read them.
As the BBC's Head of Religion I feel that simply totting up the number of hours of religion we broadcast is not a fair way to measure its value. More is not always better. The range and quality of our programmes - the vast array of live worship; music and documentaries to mark Christian festivals across BBC TV radio and online; Songs Of Praise; landmark documentary series like the recent A History Of Christianity with Diarmaid McCulloch - and the ease with which people can view those programmes on TV and now online thanks to iPlayer, I feel are equally important.
The Sunday Telegraph article quotes me as saying that the BBC should not give Christianity preferential treatment. The question I was actually asked was whether minority faiths should be treated differently from other faiths - to which I replied that all faiths should be treated in the same way and that I don't believe in treating any faith differently. It's all a bit different when you put it in its proper context, isn't it?
The article in the Church Times (editor's note: the full interview is firewalled until Friday 12th February) is a truer reflection of my point of view - and a laudably accurate treatment of the interview I gave them.
In truth, hours of TV religion programming change year-on-year and there is no trend downwards. And, for the record, we are currently broadcasting 164 hours of religious programmes a year on BBC Television (and this figure does not take into account drama, arts and news programmes which also cover religious and ethical topics). We have some great new commissions at Easter, from a special service at King's College entitled Easter At King's, and a documentary about the meaning of Easter for Good Friday on BBC One, to an investigation into whether Christians are being persecuted for their beliefs today in secular Britain (also for BBC One).
We're also investing more in our coverage of religious festivals and worship programmes.
Religion on the BBC is safe in my hands. Watch the output and forget the prophets of doom.


Comment number 1.
At 19:49 8th Feb 2010, dennisjunior1 wrote:Aaqil Ahmed ---
Thanks, for the accurate and profound duty of providing information on Religion on BBC.....
*Dennis Junior*
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 00:10 9th Feb 2010, Tom wrote:I may be an atheist, but I also feel strongly that the BBC should cater for all tastes, including those of religious people. However, it has always grated me that Thought for the Day only ever features religious speakers - as interesting as I find it listening to the views of others, can't we have the odd god-less soul step up to the microphone from time to time?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 10:33 10th Feb 2010, cping500 wrote:I understand Ahmed department covers 'ethics' so perhaps some none committed ethicists could contribute to the Thought for the Day slot as well as those who are committed to some view of religion.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 18:16 2nd Mar 2010, Carl Pierce wrote:Sadly I'm completely alienated and saddened by the way that the BBC actively discriminates against atheists and humanists.
There is little or no content directed at our world view - and we are actively barred from programmes like thought for the day.
You are completely failing to serve a large proportion of society and failing to inform those who may wish to know about other ways of seeing the world than beliefs dating from the bronze-age.
This approach is no accident as the top management of the BBC is stuffed with strongly pro-religion individuals hand picked by Tony Blair.
I feel passionately about this !
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 17:51 23rd Dec 2010, Ifti wrote:Salaam
Tolerance in Britain is an illusion.
The problem isn't Muslims not adapting to British culture, it's Brits showing much disrespect and scorn to those who are of any Islamic background. even if an Muslim was well versed in English, knew the customs etc. would they still get employment? No. Would Brits treat them as a decent human? No.
So why would they want to integrate into a culture that is constantly tearing them down?
God doesn't want the whole world to be Muslim but that the duty of Muslims, Jews and Christians is to compete in doing good works to please him. Unfortunately, we all seem to be killing each other instead. May it soon change!
There is no end to act of terrorism, forced marriages and honour killing, as long as Muslim children keep on attending state schools with monolingual non-Muslim teachers. Bilingual Muslim children need state funded Muslim schools with bilingual
Muslim teachers as role models during their developmental periods. There is no place for a non-Muslim child or a teacher in a Muslim school. There are hundreds of stat and church schools where Muslim children are in majority. In my opinion, all such schools may be opted out as Muslim Academies.
Iftikhar Ahmad
https://www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 21:59 15th Jan 2011, jacmak wrote:Re. lfti on a theological point:if muslims do not affirm jesus as the 'word of god', and christians do not affirm the koran as the 'words of god', then between them, they are in fact talking of two 'one god(s). Different religions, different god(s).
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)