Skip to main contentAccess keys help

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
BBC News
watch One-Minute World News
Last Updated:  Wednesday, 12 March, 2003, 19:06 GMT
Man loses football bet case
Terry O'Callaghan
Fighting on: Terry O'Callaghan is still chasing Coral over the winnings
A businessman who claims he is owed more than a quarter of a million pounds by bookmakers Coral has lost the latest round of a seven-year fight to land the money.

Builder Terry O'Callaghan, 59, had argued that new human rights' laws should give him the chance of another hearing in open court over the footballing "bet of a lifetime".

The case has already cost him his marriage and left him facing legal costs of �56,000.

But Mr O'Callaghan, from Heath, Cardiff, has pledged to fight on to win the �259,200 he says he is owed for winning a four-match accumulator.

Judge Hywel Moseley - sitting at Cardiff County Court - turned down Mr O'Callaghan's bid for a hearing and also awarded interim costs of �10,000 against him in the soccer saga.

Coral refused to pay out after Mr O'Callaghan gambled a �54.40 stake on a series of soccer matches.

The bookies should have to honour their obligations and not make their own arbitrary rules
Ian Glen QC

He claims to have predicted Aberdeen beating Barry Town 3-1 at 11 to 1, Newcastle beating Halmstad 4-0 at 11-1, Colchester beating Brighton 2-0 at 8 to 1 and Scarborough beating Doncaster 2-1 at seven to one.

But the firm said the betting shop manager, who has since lost his job, did not take the usual photographic record of the betting slip.

Initially, Mr O'Callaghan's claim was put to an independent arbiter from the Sporting Life.

But the examiner found for Coral because the betting slip was not validated properly - so Mr O'Callaghan took his fight to the High Court and the Court of Appeal.

Both courts ruled against him because there is no provision under the 1845 Gaming Act for betting wrangles to be taken to court.

Terry O'Callaghan
Legal tactic: A human rights bid was rejected by the judge

The action at Cardiff County Court on Wednesday was aimed at bringing the 158-year-old Act under the power of human rights' legislation.

His barrister Ian Glen QC told the court: "The bookies should have to honour their obligations and not make their own arbitrary rules."

Mr O'Callaghan said later: "I am considering appealing against this decision because I am fighting for every small punter in the country.

"I have not been given a hearing in court and I am determined to achieve that."

"I did everything properly - I filled in the betting slip and handed over my money just like any other customer," he added.

The legal wrangle has also cost Mr O'Callaghan's his 19-year marriage to his wife, Penny - the couple split up under the strain of his fight against Coral.




SEE ALSO:
Green light for Sunday gambling
21 Feb 03 |  Northern Ireland
Ban lifted on 'too lucky' punter
29 Jul 02 |  England


INTERNET LINKS:
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites


PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

News Front Page | Africa | Americas | Asia-Pacific | Europe | Middle East | South Asia
UK | Business | Entertainment | Science/Nature | Technology | Health
Have Your Say | In Pictures | Week at a Glance | Country Profiles | In Depth | Programmes
AmericasAfricaEuropeMiddle EastSouth AsiaAsia Pacific