Business

Last updated: 4 december, 2009 - 16:15 GMT

Will America go for nuclear power again?

Southern Nuclear's Vogtle nuclear power plant, near Waynesboro, Georgia. Photo from Southern Nuclear

Southern Nuclear's Vogtle nuclear power plant, near Waynesboro, Georgia

If the climate change summit in Copenhagen is to succeed, China, India and developing countries have got to be convinced that America means what it says about cutting its own carbon emissions.

But how realistic is the option that the US can switch a chunk of its power generation over from the dirty burning of coal, to nuclear power?

The nuclear power industry claims its emissions are low.

Mark Cooper of the University of Vermont Centre for Energy and the Environment

'One or two reactors is not a renaissance.The cost will prevent from them from being built,' Mark Cooper, University of Vermont

That's one reason why there's a growing head of steam in the US Congress to back the building of up to a hundred new reactors, despite the usual concerns over safety, environmental damage and runaway costs.

Steven Chu, the Nobel-prize winning Energy Secretary, has said that nuclear power will be a very important factor in getting to a low carbon future, and he's argued that America wants to recapture the lead on industrial nuclear power.

But is this just pie in the sky? Because the industry hasn't built a single domestic reactor in the last 30 years.

To play this content JavaScript must be turned on and the latest Flash player installed.

Play in either Real OR Windows Media players

First broadcast on Business Daily

Climate change links

BBC © 2014The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.