ECB marketing boss Terry Blake has a tough task

ECB spokesman Mark Hodgson said: "Anything that tarnishes the name of cricket can't be good for the game, but it's very hard to say what the perception of potential sponsors might be.

"The Central Bureau of Investigation report has only just been made public, so it really is too early to judge how it might, if at all, affect people's attitudes towards cricket."

Dr Greg Harris, lecturer in marketing at London's City University, said: "Sponsorship is a very fickle market in which it often proves difficult to hold on to clients

"The whole business is very subjective, and it certainly doesn't take many negative factors to persuade a company not to pursue a particular sport or event.

"Any sponsorship is about brand awareness, but if the perception it generated was, say, 'brand name equals cricket equals corruption', it would be a short-lived affair."

Fruitful

Cornhill's long partnership with Test cricket was, according to corporate communications manager Geoff Mayhew, "very fruitful, but we took our decision to end it for sound business reasons

Any takers? Mark Alleyne lifts the NatWest trophy

"After a fairly major reorganisation, Cornhill was no longer a single brand so it no longer made commercial sense to sponsor Test cricket as one company.

"The commitment needed - the fee alone for the last year of our deal was �3.2m - meant it did not make financial sense for a single sub-brand of the Allianz Cornhill group to continue as sponsors.

"So we bowed out, happily on a high note with England beating the West Indies."

But will companies be queueing up to take Cornhill's place?

Recognition

Mr Mayhew said: "Our association with the game helped to take public recognition of the Cornhill brand to heights we could never have dreamed about.

"I'm sure Test sponsorship could be of similar benefit to other companies, especially emerging brands trying to establish themselves in particular markets."