The article in its original form referred to the Montevideo Convention as requiring that states have “effective government” – when in fact that document refers only to a requirement for “government”.  While that might well be a reasonable interpretation of the meaning of the convention, the ECU agreed that as originally set out the impression was given that these were the words it used – and this may have misled readers on a material point.  A correction was made to the article and a note of this appended to it, which was sufficient action to consider effective action had been taken before the matter was escalated to the ECU

Resolved