BBC BLOGS - Writersroom Blog

Archives for June 2010

Newsjack - Spread The Love

Post categories:

Dan Tetsell|16:14 UK time, Monday, 28 June 2010

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

Each week, during the run-up to the Newsjack recording, I'm struck by the fact that Miles Jupp is a cursed man. A curse so rare that you can go a month of Fringe Sundays before you find someone bearing the same cross. It's the curse of being a good straight man.

This isn't to say Miles isn't funny. He is - very funny indeed. He's the lynchpin in the Newsjack (Heath Robinson) machine. Part of what makes him so suited to the role of Newsjack anchor is how he knows his way around a joke. Never be afraid to give Miles a joke. I've been asked by a few writers whether they should include stuff for Miles at the top of their sketches and my answer is always the same - absolutely. I tend to write the opening monologue but everything else comes from the writer of the sketch. If your sketch needs and intro and there isn't one, I just have to write it so all you're doing is adding to my workload and cutting down on your minutes. Honestly, a nicely written Miles intro is a joy and a relief to read.

However, and I mean this as a compliment, what makes Miles almost unique is his skilful way with a feed line, a set-up, with the unglamorous spadework of the straight man. A bit like Kenneth Horne (who I always have in my head when working on Newsjack), Miles is a man who it's a pleasure simply to spend airtime with. Very few people can deadpan through a 'crazy spokesperson' sketch as well as Miles.

And it's not fair, goddammit!

The good straight man is the un-squeaky wheel that never gets the comedy grease; the clumsy metaphor that never gets rewritten. Sometimes I suddenly spot Miles hasn't had any jokes for four pages. He's been good, and amusing, but Dr Funnyname, has all the laughs.

So what this is, I suppose, is just a request. Think about the spread of your jokes. The straight man / funny man paradigm is as old as sketch comedy itself. The cashier, the customer, the Journalist 2, the Woman - these are the characters we've all written who's only job is to say "How can I help?", "I'm sorry?", "You want to do what?" and other thankless feeds lines. Sometimes their sacrifice is necessary - they die so that others might laugh - but often it's just a matter of having another look and seeing if there's a more interesting way of doing things. Why not have sketches where everyone's funny?

There's a brusque bit of TV sitcom writing advice that's applicable here: protect your star. The name on the marquee should get the best lines. Miles (or anyone in his position) with no jokes works OK, the show still rolls along but it's a waste. I've no idea if Miles reads these blogs so I'll spare his blushes and move this from the specific to the general. A sketch needs to be as funny as possible in as short a time as possible - if half of your lines are just feeds, is that the best use of your printer ink?

While I'm talking about spreading the love - women. Remember the show's cast is two men and two women. Sketches where three men talk and then are joined by a fourth man (and we get a lot of those) are not much use to us. Miles, of course, is one of those men so even sketches where Miles speaks, then hands over to two men talking, who then hand straight back to Miles can be logistical nightmares. Write more sketches with good parts for women. It seems crazy in 2010, but if you looked at the submissions we get, you'd assume that a lot of people don't know women can be doctors, police officers, MPs, scientists.

This isn't a PC call for balance, this is a practical, artistic call - use all the talent available to you.

As always, not rules, just thoughts.

I'm going to the TV Writers' Festival this week, so the script editing duties on Newsjack Show 3 will be in the capable hands of Gareth Gwynn. If the drama people don't spot me for a comedy interloper and beat me to death with their copies of Robert McKee, I look forward to reading your stuff for Show 4.

Dan

Writers Academy 23

Post categories:

Ceri Meyrick|14:47 UK time, Monday, 28 June 2010

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

We've now shortlisted our Writers Academy entries down from over 600 to 150 and now to 24 - all of whom will be coming in for workshops in the next couple of weeks. We will then select a dozen of these for interview to pick the final eight. This is the first time we will have met many of them, and also the first time in this process that they will be considered on anything else but the quality of their writing.

To everyone else who applied - you should have had a "No" from us by now. If anyone hasn't - please get in touch with us.

We do not offer any feedback at this stage, and I wanted to try and explain why, as I know some people find this frustrating, after spending so long in applying and waiting for an answer.

- The scripts are all read several times by different people (we share the load amongst many of the Script Editors/Researchers/Readers/Producers who work in the drama department - i.e. the people you'll eventually be working with) and so focussed feedback on individual scripts is impossible with the sheer volume we're dealing with.

- So often I end up telling people simply that I thought the scripts that got through were better - sharper dialogue, clearer characters, better stories etc... not really what people want to hear. "So you're saying my dialogue's bad then? That's not what I've been told" is what they tend to come back with. Of course I don't mean that, but the fact is the Writers Academy is a competition - we take a decision on one script - it's rather brutal, but necessary for this scheme to work. I would say, however, that I and my team spend the rest of the year considering scripts from agents at (relatively) greater leisure, so get yourself an agent and you and I can have a longer conversation about your work in the future.

Finally, I broke down the final 24 according to what kind of scripts they were - as I always get asked this by people trying decide what to submit. It looks like this:

TV Screenplays - 9

Film Screenplays - 6

Stage Plays - 6

Radio Plays - 3

Interesting in the light of recent debates on the blogs about where TV development people source their writers from. Can I just say that I source writers from ABSOLUTELY ANYWHERE, and I don't actually care what medium the script is in if it's good.



TV Writers Festival: nearly full !

Post categories:

Paul Ashton|11:43 UK time, Friday, 18 June 2010

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

We have now reached capacity for applications for the TV Writers Festival - so any writers applying between now and Monday will go on a waiting list for spaces. The deadline for receipt of cheques is next week so if you want to keep hold of your place you need to send that cheque! We will contact all writers held on the waiting list early next week.

Windsor Fringe Marriott Results

Piers Beckley|16:37 UK time, Thursday, 17 June 2010

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

The results for the seventh Windsor Fringe Marriott Award for New Drama Writing have been announced.

Of the ten shortlisted plays, six - including one of the three winners - came via the BBC writersroom opportunity page.

The three winning plays are:

"Man of Straw" by N. Cowell

"Click" by Jan Perry

"We that are Left" by Peter Harrison

TV Drama - The Writers' Festival - Closing date for applications

Post categories:

Piers Beckley|17:10 UK time, Tuesday, 15 June 2010

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

It's just over a fortnight now until TV Drama - The Writers' Festival, and it's getting towards the last chance to get your application in.

Applicants must have a broadcast credit or commission. Please make sure that you tell us about your work when you apply.

The closing date for applications is 12:00midnight on the night of Monday 21st June.

Applications received after this date will be put on a waiting list in case any places become available.

If your application is successful your cheque must arrive in the office by last post on Thursday 24th June to guarantee your place.

If you're not sure whether or not you're eligible, drop us an email at [email protected] and ask!

BBC3 Drama Pilot Scripts

Post categories:

Piers Beckley|12:22 UK time, Tuesday, 15 June 2010

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

We've just uploaded two scripts from the recent series of BBC3 Drama Pilots in our script archive.

Pulse by Paul Cornell

Stanley Park by Leo Richardson

Opportunity Knocks

Post categories:

Piers Beckley|16:07 UK time, Thursday, 10 June 2010

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

Three big opportunities up on the opps page today, so I thought it's worth calling them out in the blog.

Newsjack is the BBC's open-call topical comedy show, and that means anyone can submit material. The deadline is Monday noon for sketches (starting this Monday, 14th June), and Tuesday 5pm for one-liners (starting on Tuesday 15th June).

The Red Planet Prize, this year in collaboration with Kudos Productions, is a competition with a top prize of £5,000, a guaranteed script commission from Red Planet Productions, and representation. They're looking for a 60-minute script which can either be a single or the pilot for a new series, and the deadline is 31st July.

Coming Up is a talent scheme from Channel 4 and Touchpaper TV. You'll need a 60-page script as a sample of your writing and a two-page pitch. The prize is a guaranteed network broadcast, and the deadline has been extended until 18th June.

TV Drama - The Writers' Festival - Schedule

Piers Beckley|15:55 UK time, Wednesday, 9 June 2010

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

We've been busy beavering away over the last couple of weeks sorting out what's going on at the TV Drama Writers' Festival on the 30th June / 1st July, and we're starting to get a handle on what's going on.

The scheduled sessions so far include:

Poacher turned gamekeeper

Toby Whithouse, Tony Jordan, and Alice Nutter talk about the balancing act of showrunning.

Writer for hire

Nicola Shindler and Sally Wainwright on how to get your original work on screen.

Fact to fiction

Philippa Lowthorpe and Stephen Butchard on adapting true stories.

Whose voice is it anyway?

Tony Marchant, Jed Mercurio, Mark Catley, Nicola Shindler on whether writers have lost the initiative.

You can find more on the festival schedule page, which will be updated as more sessions are confirmed.

More information about the festival.

Fill in the Blanks

Joy Wilkinson|18:52 UK time, Tuesday, 8 June 2010

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

Before writing drama, I used to edit a newspaper. On the first day of putting a new issue together, I'd get a flat-plan showing all the pages and how much space was taken up by ads. I remember the sense of relief when plenty had been sold and there weren't acres of space left to fill. And the panic when hardly any ads were sold and the space gaped at me, threatening - you've got one week to cover me with new and interesting information and NOTHING is happening out there WHATSOEVER!

I was reminded of that recently when I had to write my first serial-only episode of Doctors. Normal episodes have two elements: serial and story of the day (SOTD). The SOTD is your own idea, previously submitted and signed off. It tells the tale of a patient or other guest character and their involvement with one of the regular characters. It takes up the majority of the episode.

The rest of the episode is taken up by the serial element, given to you by the storyliner. This usually has two strands of a paragraph each, covering a handful of beats that will continue the ongoing story of our regulars' lives from the previous ep to your cliffhanger. When planning your ep, you weave the serial and the SOTD together so they complement and contrast with each other. Just when you reach a high point in your SOTD, it is a godsend to be able to cut away to the serial, and vice versa.

But with a serial-only episode, there's nowhere else to go. A vast empty flatplan with no ads at all. And I didn't even have two strands of serial, only one - a few lines in which a long-running story came to a head. It was wonderful stuff. Two great characters coming face-to-face with something deeply hidden. But how they faced it, and what to do for the other 25 or so minutes when they weren't facing it. That was my problem. Not to mention that many of the most memorable episodes of Doctors have been serial-only - Vivien telling Jimmi about her rape, George confessing to Ronnie about Nick - the bar was set alarmingly high.

To begin with, I tried to plan the ep as usual, coming up with a series of story beats that could feasibly culminate in the required confrontation, but even with a textbook structure and all the technical narrative boxes seemingly ticked, it just wasn't taking flight. I needed a different way in, so I looked back at the serial. What did I have, apart from one big moment? Oh yeah. Duh. Two great characters.

I put down my pen and spent some time just hanging out with them, wandering the streets imagining their lives in more depth than you ever get chance to when there's a patient to deal with. What were they really like? What were their fantasies, their fears, their trivial thoughts when they went to the fridge? It was quite blissful actually, indulging in some pretend friends for a couple of days. By the end, I really felt I knew them better and knew what I wanted to do with them. I took up my pen and this time things happened.

As it evolved, the story took in another couple from the Mill, another story, but not to cut away to - to pile the pressure on my main couple, making it impossible for them to run away from each other, and as hard as possible for them to confront the truth. Everything became about them, like on a birthday or wedding day when for once it's all about you and the guests are there to support you. Or cause you major headaches. When I finished, I had what was essentially a four-hander, and a good deal of cutting to do to fit it all into half-an-hour.

When it finally came together, I remembered how it was on the paper when press day rolled around. Even in the quietest news weeks, stories always emerged. People called in, wrote letters, things kicked off. At the last minute, we were never scratching around. Wherever there are people, there is news. Wherever there are characters, there is drama. You just have to take the time and listen to them.

Scotland: Write Here, Write Now - the winners

Piers Beckley|17:16 UK time, Thursday, 3 June 2010

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

We're pleased to be able to announce the winners of the Scotland: Write Here, Write Now competition from earlier this year.

Joanna Bolouri for Lewd Awakenings

Rebecca McFarland for The Madam of Morningside

Rob Drummond for Early Release

The Executive Editor Comedy, BBC Scotland, Jemma Rodgers said: "We were absolutely delighted not only by the volume of entries we received, but also by the quality. There are some very talented unknown writers out there, but in the end we could only pick three winners. Joanna, Rebecca and Rob's scripts all have a real spark to them, and capture contemporary Scotland in very funny and original ways. We're very much looking forward to working with all three of them to develop their scripts further."

Five Days in May

Post categories:

Paul Ashton|16:10 UK time, Thursday, 3 June 2010

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

We've had a fantastic response to our quick-turnaround competition - 226 entries! And here are the winning three scripts by Joel Slack-Smith, Rebecca Walker and Jonathan Appleton - well done to them for sending in ideas that we really enjoyed reading. We loved the intensity of Joel's world, the overlapping margins of Rebecca's and the quiet but funny POV in Jonathan's.

We also wanted to make an honourable mention to some other writers whose scripts made it through to the final shortlist conversation with our brilliant and generous judge, the writer Al Smith:

Martin McNamara

Sally Brockway

Matt Zandstra

James O'Brien

Christian O'Reilly

Dappers

Post categories:

Piers Beckley|16:36 UK time, Wednesday, 2 June 2010

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

Dappers, the third of BBC3's Drama Pilots is written by Catherine Johnson.

She talks about filming the series - and the differences between that and being on the set for Mamma Mia! over on the BBC3 blog.

You can watch Dappers online from tomorrow on on the BBC3 blog, or on BBC3 on Thursday 10th June.

Paul Cornell on Pulse

Post categories:

Piers Beckley|15:15 UK time, Wednesday, 2 June 2010

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

We asked writer Paul Cornell to talk about writing a scene in his new medical horror drama pilot Pulse. You can watch Pulse on BBC3 at 9pm on Thursday June 3rd, or right now on the BBC3 blog.

You may want to watch the show first - spoilers ahead.

There's one scene in the pilot script of Pulse that myself and producer Helen Gregory went back and forth on many, many times. It's right near the end, when Hannah is confronting Nick in the hospital corridor. James Hawes, our director, had scouted the building he wanted to use, and told us that there was a 'laundry cage' of some kind in place, to give Hannah somewhere she could hide in, but where Nick couldn't get at her. Emotionally, the scene takes Hannah from fearing her ex-boyfriend to fearing for him. But the problem was, it's the site of our exposition. Pulse is a medical thriller, and Hannah is right at the heart of it. It's her journey, through the episode and the series. This is the point where she, if her quest is to mean anything, has to learn something about the dark goings on behind the scenes at this NHS hospital.

There's a reason Michael York's character in the Austin Powers movies is called Basil Exposition. Exposition stops characters being characters, and makes them into simple voices for the production. The audience can always hear the gears changing, and character receding so they can be told 'what they need to know'. Sometimes, for instance in crime series, they quite like that. And these days, the reluctance to offer any exposition at all means the audience is sometimes starved of logical moments that they actually need. But nevertheless, the reluctance is there for a reason: exposition brings plot to a halt too. It's the point where characters talk about stuff that's not actually happening to them, that's about the past, or the future. And they usually stay put to do it too. Aaron Sorkin, being the kind of genius that can write shows that are all exposition, had them walk down corridors at high speed while they did it.

So, in the process of going back and forth, we worked out exactly what we needed to tell the audience to let them know what the format of the show was. That there are going to be different medical horrors every week, not just the same one repeated, that Nick wasn't happy with where the project was going, which plays off nicely against his expressed feelings elsewhere, and exactly what this week's horror was, the solution to the mystery which Hannah's been investigating, the prize she deserves for heading into danger to try and find the last element to solve that. What got cut back and cut back were the hints Nick gave about the nature of the conspiracy, of what's really going on in terms of the greater picture. We can put those in next week, or the week after. We can place them as exciting discoveries. We don't need Nick to explain himself now, when terrible things are happening and our heroes are talking against the clock.

To sort through that was a great exercise in itself, to cut exposition back to the minimum, and then to cut again. Be ruthless with your cutting: I think that's a good motto for our show. I hope that enough people watch it, and make enough noise about it, so we get a full series.

Stanley Park

Post categories:

Piers Beckley|13:10 UK time, Wednesday, 2 June 2010

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

The second and third of BBC3's new drama pilots, Dappers and Stanley Park, are going to be uploaded to the BBC3 blog tomorrow, and will air on BBC3 on Thursday 10th June.

While you're waiting, Leo Richardson, creator and writer of Stanley Park, talks about his aims and inspiration for the series here.

Tony Doyle Winner on Tony Doyle Winning

Piers Beckley|16:57 UK time, Tuesday, 1 June 2010

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

We asked the winner of this year's Tony Doyle Bursary, Vanessa Pope, if she'd say a few words on the blog about winning the prize, and what it's meant for her.

"The Eastside Princess" very nearly didn't make it out of Belfast to be judged for the 2010 Tony Doyle Bursary. The screenplay had been written while I was still a student and as a weighty, feature length script, careful consideration had to be given as to whether or not the postage could be afforded. Thankfully, I decided to 'splash out' and while a meagre meal of beans on toast followed, the subsequent success of the script is something that will stay with me for the rest of my career.

The script, set in modern-day east Belfast tells the story of Jenna McCoy, an eleven year old who when faced with the prospect of watching her family disintegrate around her, conjures herself a playmate to help put it all back together. At its core it is a story of loss though told, I hope, with some humour and optimism. I wanted to tell a story that was realistic and yet full of the kind of wild imagination that can only come from a child.

The idea of "The Eastside Princess" even being shortlisted for the Tony Doyle is something my adult brain never truly envisioned. Yet to do just that and then to win is something that has spurred my imagination to greater and more ambitious heights than ever before. It is a massive confidence boost and as such is already affecting the way I approach my writing. I feel less inclined to second guess myself - if I think an idea is good I am more inclined to go with it rather than spend two days running it down. The award is there like an invisible but very tangible mentor constantly acknowledging that the work I have done and the sacrifices I have made have been worth it and will continue to be so. Ego boosting aside, the prize itself; both the money and the residential seminar have been amazingly helpful. The seminar in particular - a blissful three days at the Tyrone Guthrie Centre was invaluable in introducing us to fellow writers and hearing the advice of people who actually work in the industry. Their motivation and encouragement to keep believing and to keep writing is something I don't think any other writing competitions could have matched. Needless to say, I remain thoroughly delighted that I took the chance.