BBC BLOGS - Writersroom Blog

Archives for July 2009

CBBC Masterclass

Post categories:

Paul Ashton|09:55 UK time, Wednesday, 29 July 2009

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

Yesterday we had our masterclass/workshop with 18 shortlisted writers, where we got to know them a lot better, they brainstormed children's drama, received feedback on their scripts, talked to writer Jo Ho about her forthcoming CBBC show Bo and the Spirit World, and got to hear from the Controller of CBBC Anne Gilchrist and CBBC Head of Drama Steven Andrew. We also asked them to complete a fast-turnaround writing exercise before they came. Some writers came from as far afield as Edinburgh, Aberystwyth, Blackpool and Sunderland. The next stage is to select the final 8 for the residential. The shortlisted writers and their scripts were:

Kerry Drewery The Office of Imaginary Friends

Andrew Turner From All Sides

Christina Balit The Remnants

Nick King Misfits

Mark Brotherhood Take Two

Jon Ware Sheila's Ark

Abigail Chandler Edison Bright

Debbie Moon Wrongblood

Matt Kimpton Melanie Watson's Guide to the Impossible

Brian Spence The Santa Trap

Tony Kerr Tell Tale

Maxwell Slater Sparks

Kulvinder Gill Cybertecs

Alice Charles 2088

Felicity Carpenter Quick, Decide!

Darren Rapier High Seas and Little Bs

Matt Sinclair The Magician's Daughter

Andy Dixon Circus Scrumptious



Writers Academy 16

Post categories:

Ceri Meyrick|12:28 UK time, Monday, 27 July 2009

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

Ta Da

The Writers Academy 2009 will be:

Tim Price

Shazia Rashid

Kim Revill

Nicola Wilson

Simon Vinnicombe

Tahsin Guner

Stacey Gregg

Lauren Klee

Big congratulations to them!

The College year is under way

Micheal Jacob|12:10 UK time, Monday, 27 July 2009

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

Last week the writers got together by the river at Teddington for an intensive workshop week, intensive because we are running one workshop this year rather than two (the cuts...). It was very full on for the writers, for me, and for our administrator Jane, but we managed to survive, and drama was confined to the screen rather than intruding into the personal.

The programme was a mixture of old and new, in the sense that we again had the pleasure of a visit from Paul Mendelson. We had a joint session with Susan Nickson and Tim Dawson, beacons of BBC3, and we were also joined by Kevin Cecil and Andy Riley, who brought along the cards which they use when planning an episode. Working with a three act structure, they write each element of the script on a separate card, including who is in which scene and what happens in it. By strewing them on the floor, it's possible to see if events are happening in the correct order, if someone disappears from the story for too long and, as Andy demonstrated, the cards can be moved around by foot. Much more helpful than having the information on screen.

We repeated the psychology of character session, heard from a producer, a director and a commissioner, and devoted two sessions to examining structure, which is something that everyone had requested.

So here, with apologies for the length, is my breakdown of a Fawlty Towers episode (we also looked at an episode of Curb Your Enthusiasm in a similar way). Fawlty Towers, of course, is effectively farce plotting, which is probably the most difficult form to pull off. But the engineering of the scripts, the ruthless application of consequences to every action, and the brilliance of almost every joke line being part of the plot means that there are general lessons, irrespective of comic style.

I'm here for the rest of the week, then on holiday, so if there are any comments I'll do my best to answer them before I go. And (disclaimer) this analysis is my own and not to be regarded as definitive. I watched a DVD and made notes on each scene, which isn't a bad thing to do if you want to teach yourself.

FAWLTY TOWERS

Character, structure and plot in The Kipper and the Corpse

Scene one - Bar, night 1

The Major is talking to Mrs Chase about her dog. There is a shitzu joke in the second speech and a lap/Lapp dog joke shortly thereafter. So the first laughs come early. Mrs Chase asks Basil to get a saucer of milk for the dog. Basil tells Manuel to get it. Dr Price arrives and asks if it's too late for dinner - he really feels like sausages. Sybil says dinner is over, but he can have a sandwich. She tells Basil to make it. An older man with a younger woman head for bed.

This scene establishes a number of things. First, it sets up the hierarchy of character. Basil tells Manuel what to do, but is in turn told what to do by Sybil. We see that Basil kow-tows to favoured guests. Second, it sets up the two episode sub-plots: Mrs Chase's dog, and Dr Price's desire for sausages. It suggests that the older man/younger woman might be a sub-plot. But there is no indication of a main story.

Scene two - Reception, night 1

Sybil is gossiping to a friend on the phone about the older man's latest young woman, when they arrive to pick up their key. Then a queasy man - Mr Leeman - arrives with some friends who say they will see him in the morning, then specifically at 9.30 in the morning. We learn twice that he is not feeling well. He asks for breakfast in bed, about which Basil makes a fuss, forcing Mr Leeman to say goodnight.

The older man/younger woman again feel like a sub-plot, but in fact they disappear from the episode after this. Given the precision of the story engineering, and the fact that they're not intrinsically funny and have no lines, they feel possibly like leftovers from a previous draft, or had a third appearance which was cut in the edit due to the length of the episode. Whatever the reason, they do not contribute to the story, and with over-long episodes the rule is always to preserve the story rather than jokes.

Sybil's phone conversation suggests that she regards the guests as a source of amusement and gossip.

Although the main story is not yet clear, there are strong hints in the repetition of Mr Leeman's morning meeting time, and of his illness, that the story of the week is going to be about him.

Hence, these two scenes would equate to the end of Act One.



Scene three - Dining Room, Day 2 (the rest of the piece takes place during the same day)

Dr Price orders sausages for breakfast from Polly, which is the first time we see her. There is a feeling of competence about her, underlined when Manuel can't understand that Mrs Chase wants tepid milk in a bowl, and not a saucer, for her dog, which Polly explains to him. And an extra cushion to raise him closer to the table.

This scene develops the dog and sausage sub-plots.

Scene four - Kitchen (continuous)

Basil walks into a busy scene, reading aloud from the paper about striking car workers. Sybil isn't interested. She has been preparing Mr Leeman's breakfast, and gives Basil the remaining kippers to return to the fridge. He is concerned that they are well past their use-by date. Sybil says it's all right.

We are reminded of Mr Leeman, and the idea is planted of out-of-date food. We infer that Basil is somewhat right wing, and the motif of strikers is revisited when Manuel later says he is on strike.

Scene five - Dining room (continuous)

Manuel returns with milk, and a cushion for the dog. After some business with the cushion on the table and the bowl on the chair, the dog bites Manuel. And then bites Polly. Mrs Chase orders sausages for the dog.

Further dog development. More sausages. And Polly is motivated to poison the dog.

Scene six - Kitchen (continuous)

Basil is still worrying about the kippers. Sybil tells him to bring up Mr Leeman's breakfast, and reminds him that the laundry men are coming later. Polly is putting pepper and Tabasco on the dog's sausages for revenge.

Further dog and sausage development, and planting the later arrival of the laundry men.

Scene seven - Staircase (continuous)

Basil is bringing Mr Leeman's tray upstairs.

Scene eight - Bedroom (continous)

Basil enters Mr Leeman's bedroom, Room 8, to find Mr Leeman expressionless and propped up in bed. Basil continues his rant about striking car workers, and tries to get a 'thank you' which isn't forthcoming.

It is quite clear that Mr Leeman is dead, but Basil's disinterest in people - other than those who appeal to his snobbery or self-interest - does not allow him to notice this.

Thus, in this scene it's clear that Mr Leeman is the subject of the main story, and the fact that we know he is dead, whereas Basil does not, establishes a sense of comic anticipation. Putting the audience ahead of a character can be useful.

Scene nine - Staircase (continuous)

Basil going downstairs passes Polly coming upstairs with milk, which had been left off Mr Leeman's tray.

Scene ten - Kitchen (continuous)

Basil complains to Sybil about Mr Leeman's rudeness in not responding. Sybil is filling a laundry basket.

More comic anticipation, and a visual reminder that the laundry men are coming. We also see Manuel getting salt.

Scene eleven - Dining room (continuous)

Basil goes into the dining room, to see that the dog is distressed. Mrs Chase is unhappy.

Both a continuation of the dog sub-plot, and a possible harbinger, in that Mr Leeman was complaining of being ill the night before, and a sub-text of food poisoning - accidental or deliberate - is emerging.

Scene twelve - Kitchen (continuous)

Terry gives Manuel Dr Price's sausages to serve. Manuel is putting salt on them when Polly arrives to announce that Mr Leeman is dead. Shocked, Manuel keeps pouring. Sybil and Polly leave for Room 8. Basil comes in, learn that Leeman is dead, realises he served Mr Leeman date-expired kippers, and rushes...

Scene thirteen - Staircase (continuous)

...upstairs, passing Sybil coming down on her way to fetch Dr Price.



Scene fourteen - Bedroom (continuous)

Basil joins Polly, who has stayed in the bedroom. He panics about the kippers and tries to get rid of them. Polly says Leeman had been dead for hours. Basil has to amend his joy to assumed grief when Sybil returns with Dr Price. The doctor puts him on the spot - why didn't Basil notice Leeman was dead? Polly tries to help, but fails.



Scene fifteen - Staircase/Reception (continuous)

Basil, Sybil and Polly rush downstairs, discussing what to do with the body. They have to move it from the room because another guest is arriving. Sybil says to put the body in the office until the undertakers arrive. As Sybil makes up Leeman's bill, which she will tuck into his wallet, Polly phones the undertaker. Basil grabs Manuel, and takes up upstairs to wrangle the body. Dr Price comes down, and says he has to report the death to the coroner. He goes back to try and get some breakfast.

Scene sixteen - Landing (continuous)

Polly keeps watch as Basil and Manuel manhandle the body, disguised as laundry, along the landing. The elderly Miss Tibbs, coming the other way, picks up a pillow which has fallen from the body, won't be shooed away, and in the kerfuffle the body is revealed. Miss Tibbs has hysterics, and starts to cry 'murder'. Basil encourages Polly to slap her, and when helping to guide Polly's aim manages to knock Miss Tibbs out.

Two guests, Mr and Mrs White, are coming upstairs, so both Mr Leeman and Miss Tibbs are dragged into the nearest bedroom. Which turns out to be that of the Whites. Polly tries to stall them, but they are insistent - they need to collect some things before going out. Basil locks the door.

Scene seventeen - Bedroom (continuous)

We see that the bodies have been stashed in the wardrobe.

Scene eighteen - Landing (continuous)

The bedroom door is opened.

Scene nineteen - Bedroom (continuous)

The Whites come in. Miss Tibbs is coming round, and is making noises from the wardrobe. The Whites are curious, won't be distracted, and then Miss Tibbs starts to bang on the wardrobe door. The Whites demand that she be let out. She is, but she is incoherent, and meanwhile Polly notices that Mr Leeman's arm is visible. The Whites are stunned.

This is the end of a continuous sequence from Scene three to Scene nineteen. It is marked by a fade out/fade in, whereas until this point there have been cuts.

Scenes twelve to nineteen are almost exclusively devoted to the main story, but Dr Price's sausages and the theme of poisoned/lethal food recur.

The continuous action, the use of stairs and of physical movement, creates a great sense of urgency. Sybil and the doctor are calm, contrasting with Basil's mounting panic. The problem of what to do with the body occupies much of the episode. Sybil's suggestion of putting it in the office until the undertakers arrive is eminently sensible. It is Basil who complicates matters by not being straightforward, and Polly, the other sensible one of the four, always wants to help Basil out rather than joining Sybil on the side of logic.

This is now halfway through the episode, and though the fade in/fade out might suggest a 'mid-point of Act Two', in fact the main story continues to develop rather than setting off in an unexpected direction.

Scene twenty - Office (check loc)

Sybil is trying to comfort Miss Tibbs, but is not really listening (oh, I know).

Scene twenty one - Reception/Office

The Whites are on the phone booking alternative accommodation. As they leave, Basil, Manuel and Polly come downstairs with Mr Leeman, and prop him on a chair in the office.

Scene twenty two - Office (continuous)

The Major pops in for a chat, sees the body, and treats it with equanimity.

Scene twenty three - Hall (continuous)

Basil rushes into the hall, to find Dr Price asking for his breakfast.

Scene twenty four - Dining room/Kitchen/Dining room (continuous)

Basil goes through the dining room to the kitchen and starts sausages cooking. He hears Miss Tibbs banging the reception bell and demanding to speak to him, and closes the door. He goes to the dining room to apologise to Dr Price, hears sounds of distress, and rushes out to find...

Scene twenty five - Office (continuous)

...Miss Tibbs passed out next to Mr Leeman, with Manuel being ineffectual. Sybil arrives and asks why they put the body in the chair. They set out to bring the body to the kitchen, but another guest comes downstairs, so they divert through the front door.

Scene twenty six - Hotel steps, exterior (continuous)

The Whites, just driving off, see Basil and Manuel with the body. Polly waves them back in as the coast is now clear. We hear the Whites, distracted, crash the car.

Scene twenty seven - Hall (continuous)

Basil and Manuel carry in the body, but are waylaid by Mrs Chase, who demands that Basil call a vet for her ailing dog.

Scene twenty eight - Kitchen (continuous)

Basil and Manuel bring Mr Leeman into the kitchen and put him on a work surface. The kitchen is filled with smoke, because Basil has forgotten the doctor's sausages. The doctor comes in, and says they have to get the body away from food. Basil and Manuel put the body in the laundry basket.

Scene 29 - Hall (continuous)

The Whites come in and go upstairs. Basil and Manuel bring the laundry basket into the hall, watched by a man. Basil calls Sybil, without response.

Scene 30 - Office (continuous)

Sybil is giving Miss Tibbs a medicinal brandy.

Scene 31 - Kitchen (continuous)

Basil apologises to the doctor, and starts cooking more sausages.

Scene 32 - Dining Room (continuous)

Manuel is cleaning up, removing tablecloths, etc. He and Dr Price have a set-to about whether breakfast is still available. Manuel says no. Basil comes in and pokes Manuel in the eye.

Scene 33 - Reception (continuous)

Sybil gives a guest the key to Room 8. Mr Leeman's friends arrive to pick him up. Basil and Manuel arrive with the laundry basket. The friends say they are meeting Mr Leeman, and ask Basil if he knows where Leeman is. The woman in the group says they have come to collect him. Basil mistakes them for undertakers. He opens the basket, but there is no body inside. Polly comes in and says the fresh laundry has arrived. She, Basil and Manuel rush out.

Scene 34 - Outside Hotel (continuous)

They stop the laundry van.

Scene 35 - Dining room (continuous)

Dr Price is sitting at a table, while smoke wafts from the kitchen.

Scene 36 - Hall (continuous)

Basil and Manuel bring in another laundry basket. "He's in this one."

One of the friends says they have come to collect him to take him to a meeting. Basil tries to recover the situation. Sybil emerges to deal with the situation, while...

Scene 37 - Stairs/Bedroom/Bedroom (continuous)...Basil and Manuel bring the body upstairs to Room 8, which is now occupied by a man in a dressing gown blowing up a sex doll. They take the body into the Whites' room, which is in darkness, but the Whites are in residence.

Scene 39 - Stairs/Hall/Kitchen/Hall (continuous)

Basil and Manuel take the body back downstairs and into the kitchen. Dr Price is cooking his own sausages. Basil wants Manuel to help him put Mr Leeman back in the basket, but Manuel goes on strike and gets into the basket himself. Basil is holding the body by the feet as Sybil emerges with Mr Leeman's friends. He props the body up in front of the hat rack, and shields it. One of Leeman's friends wants his hat. Basil stalls. Polly tries to help.

Miss Tibbs arrives, demanding to talk to Basil. The Whites come downstairs in a state. Mrs Chase turns up, saying that her dog has been poisoned. Dr Price emerges, saying that the sausages are off. Basil says that Sybil will explain everything.

As the crowd converges on her, Basil climbs into the laundry basket, and is carried off by two laundry men. Miss Tibbs turns to see Mr Leeman's propped-up body and has the vapours. Sybil shouts: "Basil!"

Scene 40 - Exterior Hotel (continuous)

The basket is loaded on the van and driven away.

This final scene brings together the dog sub-plot, the doctor's breakfast sub-plot, the poisoned/lethal food sub-text, and ends the story in a logical, if not an entirely satisfyingly dramatic way. There is no resolution - logically, there can't be, so Basil disappears, leaving Sybil to sort out the mess, and us to wonder how much punishment he'll receive when he gets home.

With the sitcom form dedicated to a return to the status quo at the end of each episode - in the sense that characters don't change their relationships, albeit that their circumstances can change - then this episode achieves that in the pattern of Basil mucks up, Manuel complicates, Polly tries to head off disaster, and Sybil (we assume) sorts it.

In this script nothing is wasted. Everything (apart from older man/younger woman) contributes to story, whether it is story unfolding in the present, or seeds being planted for later flowering.

Although the method of Fawlty Towers is one in which Basil - like Larry David - is the author of his own misfortunes, there is little moral context and there is a cruel element which does not have consequences. Basil is physically abusive to Manuel, and in this episode Polly kills a dog which, in any other show, would lead to an outcry from the audience.



CBBC Competition

Post categories:

Paul Ashton|11:54 UK time, Monday, 20 July 2009

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

There has clearly been a flurry of comments about the CBBC competition - I'm afraid I haven't been able to reply until today. But rather than deal with numerous individual comments, i'll try to make some more general ones about the submissions -

We fully appreciate that it's frustrating to be kept waiting for a decision and to want an individual response and feedback. But we did turn it around very very quickly and we did give a deadline by which we would contact shortlisted writers. With more than 700 entires, we simply cannot offer feedback other than to those shortlisted. (This was all in the rules and regulations, of course.)

We did receive more entries than we expected. Which did mean the odds stacked more heavily against any given writer. But it was great that the opportunity caught the imagination so much.

The process we operated was this:

A team of readers read at least the first ten pages - if they weren't hooked or engaged enough by some element of the script by this point, then it was given a 'no'. If they were immediately impressed, it was given a 'yes' and longlisted. If they were unsure, then they read on until they felt confident about making a longlisting decision. If they were still unsure, it was given to another reader for a second opinion. If they were still unsure, it was put through anyway to give the benefit of the doubt. We also had regular reading team catch-ups every couple of hours about the scripts they were putting through, the ones they were unsure about etc.

All longlisted scripts were second-read by either myself or our in-house script reader. We then recommended on scripts for a third-read by Kate Rowland. Once this swathe of reading was done, we sat down with the piles of third-read and second-read scripts and talked about them. This is where we decided on our shortlist for the masterclass.

We did receive a fair proportion of scripts that showed promising writing and writers - but that just didn't really connect with the brief and the potential audience. In fact, we received a lot of scripts in general that didn't have central characters below the age of 12, that were unsuitable for a 6-12 audience, that weren't particularly imagined and told from the child's point of view. We also received a lot of scripts covering very similar precincts and ideas. For example, school - first day of school, bullying at school, geeks at school, weird conspiracy/sci-fi/alien/monster at school. We had a lot of portals into other dimensions, plenty of time travel, a fair few goblins/monsters/aliens.

The ones that got through to the next stages had an original perspective on precincts and ideas - a unique touch with the characters, idea, world, tone. There were a lot of very competent scripts - but we focused our energy on that small proportion that were doing something different, something we'd never seen before, something that surprised us, something that hooked us emotionally, something that made us laugh out loud.

So that's how it worked. A couple of other things:

Just because there isn't a coffee stain on your script, doesn't mean it hasn't been looked at - we in fact ask our readers not to abuse scripts while on the premises.

Our readers work extremely hard for us - even if writers don't get feedback, that doesn't mean we are treating your script with contempt in any way shape or form. If we say we're not going to email everyone or do a blog post in our rules and regulations then it's not really bad manners to not do them.

And yes, we do read the blog comment trails...!

Last Chance Comedy

Post categories:

Piers Beckley|18:43 UK time, Friday, 17 July 2009

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

Dan Tetsell writes about writing for Newsjack over at the BBC Comedy blog.

It's the last episode of the current series next week, so if you want to submit a sketch or one-liners for the current series you need to do it now.

Good luck!

Writers Academy 15

Post categories:

Ceri Meyrick|13:50 UK time, Thursday, 16 July 2009

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

Even Shorter List

We're now down to the final 13 who will be interviewed next week. The two workshop days last week were brilliant. Kate Rowland and I met twenty nine writers and they got to find out a bit more about Continuing Drama and whether it was for them. All the writers were good, but it was a process of finding who we felt could be the "all rounders" - those who'd be as a happy writing Holby as Doctors, EastEnders as Casualty.

The joy of the whole workshop process is we're uncovering talent, not just for the Writers Academy but for the whole department. Each writer who doesn't make it onto the Academy is given feedback and looked at by the shows separately - either for commission or for one of the shadow schemes which all four shows are running. The Writers Academy is just one way into writing for Continuing Drama, and it's by no means the only way, and I am really hoping lasting relationships will be formed with some of the shortlisted writers by individual shows too.

The involvement of the Writersroom also means that the writers will be given access to other parts of the BBC - advice on how to get seen by Radio, Childrens etc...as part of their feedback.

So, for those who don't make it past this stage the story doesn't end here....

Jon Plowman Interview

Post categories:

Piers Beckley|11:11 UK time, Thursday, 16 July 2009

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

Not one of ours, but while poking about down the back of the Internet I found this excellent interview with Jon Plowman from a few years ago.

Scotland Writes

Piers Beckley|17:36 UK time, Wednesday, 15 July 2009

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

I'm pleased to announce that we're now able to start taking entries for a new competition from BBC Scotland.

It's called Scotland Writes, and they're looking for new series or serials from writers living in Scotland, or people born there who've since moved away.

We've also just finalised the dates for three more roadshows over the next few months in Glasgow, Inverness, and Dundee. More details on our roadshow page.

New Roadshow - Birmingham

Post categories:

Piers Beckley|17:18 UK time, Monday, 13 July 2009

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

We've just announced a new roadshow date in Birmingham on Tuesday 18 August to join the previously-announced Norwich date on EDIT: 6 October.

As ever, you can find out how we deal with your scripts, ask questions, and even hand scripts in to us in person.

ABBA Results!

Charlotte Riches|16:14 UK time, Thursday, 9 July 2009

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

After weeks of agonising waiting, we were finally able to put the nine shortlisted ABBA writers out of their misery, when last night, at the prize giving ceremony, we announced who had won the award. So, I'm incredibly pleased to tell you that Chris Wilson, with his play 'Playing the Game' is the winner of the 2009 Alfred Bradley Bursary Award. 'Playing the Game' is a play about a teenage boy who has to negotiate his dad's growing relationship with his aunt after his mother's death, his ambitions to be a footballer, school bullies and his acne. The Radio Drama Commissioner Jeremy Howe called it 'an extraordinary rites of passage play' before presenting Chris with a bursary for £3000. Chris later that evening said that winning the award was a 'huge honour' and that he would never normally have thought about writing for radio drama, but 'ABBA gave me the incentive to send in my play and see what happened'. What has happened is that 'Playing the Game' has now been put forward for a radio drama commission, Chris has received a bursary and will also receive a years mentorship with a Radio Drama North Producer. We very much look forward to working with Chris and developing his ideas. So watch this space!

Chris was not the only ABBA winner though. Two scripts came joint second in the award. These scripts were 'God and That' by Tom Wells and 'White Horses' by Ben Ayrton. Both Tom and Ben received £1000 bursary money and will receive a years mentorship with a Producer. One script was highly commended by the judges, 'Maine Road' by Sarah McDonald Hughes and two scripts were commended, 'Faith' by Alexandra Denye and 'Driftwood Something Something' by Paul Buie. Sarah, Alexandra and Paul will all receive mentorship and have the chance to develop their scripts and further ideas for the Radio 4 offers round.

We in Radio Drama North are absolutely thrilled by the high level of talent which has come through the award this year, and we know that these very talented writers, most of whom are at the very beginning of their writing careers, have bright and brilliant futures in front of them, and it will be a pleasure to help them on their way.

Writers Academy 14

Post categories:

Ceri Meyrick|09:52 UK time, Wednesday, 8 July 2009

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

Shortlist

It's been a month since I last blogged, and we've now shortlisted down to thirty writers. This means that everyone who entered should have received a "yes" or a "no". If you haven't - something's gone wrong - so you need to get in touch with us directly.

This is the longest stage of the process. Each of the 150 long-listed scripts was read in full by two members of the drama department and marked in eight categories: Dialogue, Character, Narrative Structure and Pace, Distinctive Voice, Emotional Appeal, Visual Storytelling, Credible World and "Did it keep your attention?". Each section is marked out of five and so the final score is a mark out of 80. It's tough "scoring" writing ability, but at least it gives us something to hang our responses on and it's the best system we've come up with so far. Anyone got a better suggestion I would love to hear it!

The team and I then read as many of those as is humanly possible (usually all those with marks over 50). We then (and only then) look at the application forms and factor those into the equation:

- Do they watch (or at least pretend to watch!) Continuing Drama? - you'd be amazed those applications that don't even mention the programmes... or television!

- Do they have some knowledge of the pressure they'll be working under?

- Do they come across as writers who can work collaboratively? - really difficult to judge, and this is what the workshops are all about.

- What's their writing CV so far and how does it show an aptitude for this kind of writing? (that doesn't mean only writers who've worked on continuing drama before)

- Do they want it? - do they really want it? Again impossible to judge from 400 words on a stuffy online application form, but you have to try get to the heart of what they're saying and make a judgement on this.

Then... we get input from the Writersroom for anyone on the list who's work they've read, we ask around, we ask for second opinions, we compare notes... basically we do everything we can to try and make this rather artificial process as fair and as exhaustive as possible.

I'll be meeting the final thirty at the workshops later this week. We're very excited about them, and the quality of work this year, everyone agrees, has been higher than ever. If you didn't make it this time, I would really encourage you to try again next year. I could have filled the workshops several times over with worthy people.

CBBC Competition

Post categories:

Paul Ashton|13:51 UK time, Friday, 3 July 2009

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

So the deadline for our CBBC competition passed on Wednesday and we have received more than 700 submissions! Our crack team of readers are sifting through scripts as I blog and we will be contacting writers selected for the masterclass by the end of next week...

Out to play in Somers Town

Micheal Jacob|09:46 UK time, Friday, 3 July 2009

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

When we ran the last Sitcom Talent scheme in 2004, we received an outstanding entry, set in a school. It had strong characters, an organised story, was extraordinarily funny, and came with a strongly worded letter saying that it would be age discrimination if the writers were ruled out of the competition for being 12 years old.

Sadly, we had to discriminate, but I had a meeting with the girls and their parents, where we talked through the script and what they needed to do to add an extra ten minutes. They went away, it went quiet for a bit, and then they wrote to say that, all things considered, they were children and would rather play with their Sims. Which was fair enough.

I remembered Jayne and Lauren last night when I spent an astonishing two hours in a small theatre in north London. Under the umbrella title Jumping for Joy - The Uplifting Plays,the audience was treated to nine short two-handed pieces by writers ranging in age from nine to 11.

It's a venture called Scene and Heard that is now 10 years old, and was inspired by a similar project in New York. It entails professional directors, script editors and actors working with children from the ethnically mixed, socially deprived area of Somers Town in north London to develop ten-minute plays for performance, the aim being both to encourage the children's creativity and increase their self-esteem.

Human characters are not allowed. The plays must feature either animals or inanimate objects. So last night involved the second biggest mountain in the world and a private detective hyena; a scorpion and a posh lavatory, and a recipe book and a toe fungus bacteria, among others.

The results are extraordinary - hilarious, touching, and unexpected. From time to time there are hints of the children's real world - two pieces mentioned anger management, for example - but their lives feature more in the sub-text. There is a lot going on in these plays, not least in the dialogue, which offers lines to make professionals jealous.

I was particularly moved by the story of a male pterodactyl and a female pair of glasses. The pretodactyl has been captured and is forced to fly rubbish to a dump. He can't escape, because if he flies out of London he will be electrocuted through the collar he must wear. Working together, he and the glasses manage to rob the Queen's fortune, so that she achieves her dream of exchanging glass for see-through diamonds, and he buys his freedom and can fly with her outside London.

Slavery, economic disparity, romance across the classes and freedom are large areas for any drama, and here they were cleverly and satisfyingly dealt with over a few minutes by 10-year-old Alfie Robinson.

Equally touching was the story, by nine-year-old Suban Abdirhaman, of the weather forecast and a water pistol being trapped in and escaping from a drawer. The weather forecast came from a family of weather forecasts and really wanted to be a gymnast. The water pistol wanted to be a real gun in the army. Again, by working together they managed to achieve their dreams, despite a rather awkward and mistrustful relationship.

These plays aren't cosy. They are clear-sighted, and not all of them have happy endings, despite a laughter rate that equals the most popular audience sitcom.

It made me wonder, though, how many of the Somers Town children, having been given a foundation in drama, will go on to become writers. Will they decide, like the Talent girls, that it's too much like hard work? Will they persevere with writing, only to lose heart when they encounter the harsh professional world?

It would be lovely to think that I'll get an e-mail at some point from Jayne and Lauren with a script attached, and that some of the Scene and Heard writers will go on to suceed but, of course, as Sims are replaced by the real world, the place of writing is bound to diminish.

But the Scene and Heard plays seemed to me to carry some important lessons for grown-up writers. They were all about something real, they were direct, and they weren't afraid to confront emotion. I often respond to scripts from new writers by saying that characters should have the capacity to make audiences cry as well as laugh, and sometimes they respond negatively to that advice. One this week said that he had been writing a simple comedy, which was funny for the sake of it, and he didn't see the need for characters with depth.

That's fair enough, and shows like that get commissioned, but I think all writers should aspire to create scripts with emotional depth. The Somers Town children weren't thinking in those terms, but did so none the less. I suppose that it's a harder thing to achieve the more self-consciousness arrives with age, leading to an unwillingness to expose oneself on the page. Adults tend to edit the imagination, and guard against disclosure, which is why last night was so refreshing and why the pterodactyl flew.

Excellent advice from Merlin Mann (via John August)

Post categories:

Piers Beckley|12:52 UK time, Wednesday, 1 July 2009

Blog comments are currently unavailable. Find out more.

Was just checking out John August's blog, and he's got a post featuring a podcast by Merlin Mann (of 43 Folders) talking about creativity and writing, and whether or not your work's good enough.

Well worth a listen - the good stuff starts at about twelve minutes in - but if you can't be bothered, here's the secret.

Start.

Check it out.