The Archers 60th anniversary live

Spend the big day with us here on the Archers Blog. We'll be publishing your tweets and comments about the big anniversary storylines and sharing pictures and stories from the history of the drama all day until the end of this evening's special double episode. We'll also keep you up-to-date with the schedule of archive programmes on Radio 7 all day.
- The picture is from The Archers Archive. The caption reads: "Bill Payne and Ned Larkin, Bob Arnold as Tom Forrest, Hilary Newcombe as Polly Perks, Denis Folwell as Jack Archer, Chris Gittins as Walter Gabriel and Alan Devereux as Sid Perks. The Bull, Ambridge, a game of crib watched by the Landlord and Polly."



Page 1 of 2
Comment number 1.
At 10:51 2nd Jan 2010, Suze wrote:Tony/tractor? Action replay?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 11:23 2nd Jan 2010, Yvonne wrote:60th anniversary episode - I think Owen is released from prison and attacks Kathy but is disturbed by Kenton who is seriously injured / killed in the ensuing fight. Helen is so shocked she loses her baby.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 11:32 2nd Jan 2010, W wrote:Can I bring a note of sombreness to this. Today is the 40th anniversary of the Ibrox disaster when 66 people died, so no flippant comments about people being crushed to death please...
Other than that what about a return for Sam...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 12:00 2nd Jan 2010, Elaine wrote:Today is just the greatest new year present ever!! Thank you BBC!! Archer's classic episodes on Radio 7 in the run-up to tonight's double episode.
So pleased that I'm working on my computer all day and can listen.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 14:02 2nd Jan 2010, johidderley-co-uk wrote:[Unsuitable/Broken URL removed by Moderator] believes that Grace Archer never died in the fire and it was all a conspiracy. Tonight, she returns to reclaim Brookfield. As Jill Archer was never legally married there are monster implications for all the Ex- Archers David, Kenton Shula etc. and as from tomorrow the series will be wound down and called 'The Jones' - The everyday Story of Illegitimate Countryfolk'!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 14:07 2nd Jan 2010, johidderley-co-uk wrote:I believe that Grace Archer never died in the fire and it was all a conspiracy. Tonight, she returns to reclaim Brookfield. As Jill Archer was never legally married there are monster implications for all the Ex- Archers David, Kenton Shula etc. and as from tomorrow the series will be wound down and called 'The Jones' - The everyday Story of Illegitimate Countryfolk'!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 14:32 2nd Jan 2010, gailw wrote:Really enjoying listening to the repeats & looking for ward to tonight's programme.
I think Harry is undergoing or has undergone sexual realignment.
The Grundy boys have a massive set to and someone ????? is fatally injured - maybe Clarrie or Nic get caught in the crossfire.
Helen goes into labour and all is not well.
Vicky announces she's pregnant.
I'm spoilt for choice really.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 15:55 2nd Jan 2010, strawbuckie wrote:Really enjoying the whole day of The Archers on Radio 7, best Christmas present possible!
My theories for tonight:
Fire at Lower Loxley
Clive Horrobin returns
Jill confesses an affair with Joe Grundy and that David is really a Grundy
Jazzer wins the Euro lottery
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 16:59 2nd Jan 2010, pauljam20 wrote:I think that since Helen has been getting madder and madder recently, it is most likely to involve her - I think she will attack and kill Tony.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 17:05 2nd Jan 2010, Tracy Faulkner wrote:All this speculation is so exciting. I'm going out tonight so will have to record it but I'm hoping that: 1, Helen reveals that the father of her unborn baby is Joe Grundy who has been selling his bodily fluids to raise money, 2, Adam reveals that he and Ian are pregnant (a la Elton John), and 3, the ghost of Nigel's mother comes back to haunt Lizzie for wearing her brooch. Apart from that, I think something will happen in the Bull, to do with Jolene leaving the chip pan on when she takes too many sleeping pills...... watch this space! Dum de dum de dum de dum.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)
Comment number 11.
At 18:09 2nd Jan 2010, Snowy_White wrote:SATTC - Is this the long awaited "omnibus edition" where the entire cast disappear over a cliff in an omnibus? If so I look forward to meeting up with my old friends Dick Barton and Jock again.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 11)
Comment number 12.
At 18:13 2nd Jan 2010, geordiepeter wrote:There has been so much about helen and baby in the past weeks. So, the baby is born today, but because of a mistake at the clinic, the child turns out to be of mixed race. Pat. Tony, Helen all have to come to terms with this over the following years.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 12)
Comment number 13.
At 18:57 2nd Jan 2010, mad_mark wrote:i think tony or someone will be run over by a tractor.
I also have to agree with people saying that some thing is going to happen helen or the baby. I been paying close interest to this story line as my wife is pregnant and due in jan.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 13)
Comment number 14.
At 19:18 2nd Jan 2010, Extractorfan wrote:Here it comes...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 14)
Comment number 15.
At 19:31 2nd Jan 2010, Suze wrote:No, no, I can't bear it. Dear, dear Nigel. Poor David. Oh how dreadful. More wine now.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 15)
Comment number 16.
At 19:31 2nd Jan 2010, Septic wrote:Was that it?
What a let down....
Complain about this comment (Comment number 16)
Comment number 17.
At 19:31 2nd Jan 2010, erikacjc wrote:Oh, no! That's the end of a rather wonderful era.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 17)
Comment number 18.
At 19:32 2nd Jan 2010, Post Meridiem wrote:Pathetic in every respect. Time to bring the whole thing to a permanent close.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 18)
Comment number 19.
At 19:32 2nd Jan 2010, MrsG wrote:Now Lizzie will blame David
Complain about this comment (Comment number 19)
Comment number 20.
At 19:34 2nd Jan 2010, Jason the Brummie builder wrote:As soon as the banner on the roof was mentioned by Nigel it was clear one of them would fall. Then Nigel goes on and on about his childhood so we knew it was to be him killed off. But I didn't hear the thump of the body on the ground so perhaps he survives? Shame Helen did.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 20)
Comment number 21.
At 19:34 2nd Jan 2010, dtc333 wrote:So how high is the roof..?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 21)
Comment number 22.
At 19:36 2nd Jan 2010, jeanmr wrote:O, dear, could not actually listen to the last four minutes, too much tension. After Mark died I could not listen for a month, now this. It is meant to be soothing and easy, this programme that I have listed to for years. Too sad..
Complain about this comment (Comment number 22)
Comment number 23.
At 19:36 2nd Jan 2010, Elaine wrote:Poor Nigel! Just when he and Lizzie were so loved-up. I liked all the red herrings down the pathway to tragedy...Tony and the tractor at the end of last week, the dash to hospital when you thought Tony would crash and then the emergency baby delivery.
But in the end it was all Kenton Archer's fault.....
Complain about this comment (Comment number 23)
Comment number 24.
At 19:36 2nd Jan 2010, BoatinWend wrote:Death of Nigel pathetic? Not at all. Better than a lot of unbelievable drama and tragedy. I don't know why we have to celebrate these great moments with deaths at all.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 24)
Comment number 25.
At 19:37 2nd Jan 2010, nic20100 wrote:Nigel was a bit annoying, but to have him die falling from his roof (and I assume he is dead though I guess we'll have to wait until tomorrow to find out for sure!) but I think I would have preferred David to die, personally - sorry, he's a right moaner!!
@PostMeridiem Why on earth waste time blogging if you don't like the Archers -
Complain about this comment (Comment number 25)
Comment number 26.
At 19:37 2nd Jan 2010, Desperate wrote:I am furious. Get rid of a popular character and just have some drama around an unpopular one. And Tony sees the error of his ways, even though he was right about the pregnancy all along.
Why is it so important to keep the irritants?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 26)
Comment number 27.
At 19:37 2nd Jan 2010, doctorjeffers wrote:Well, it aint over yet. Nigel could survive the fall and David could fall off and die.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 27)
Comment number 28.
At 19:38 2nd Jan 2010, 1helen90 wrote:Please please do not kill Nigel off I remember him and Elizabeth getting together. I know he can be wimpish sometimes but the Archers need him
Complain about this comment (Comment number 28)
Comment number 29.
At 19:38 2nd Jan 2010, Paragirl wrote:Was that Nigel or David...or both????
Complain about this comment (Comment number 29)
Comment number 30.
At 19:38 2nd Jan 2010, Duncan wrote:That was a bit of a let down I am afraid. Nigel and David's acting was not up to standard. But I suppose it is to late to moan about that. It did become a bit predictable. Roll on next week.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 30)
Comment number 31.
At 19:38 2nd Jan 2010, HenryTemple wrote:Regarding Septic's comment, I thought this epsiode was well done. This is The Archers not CSI or EastEnders but there was so much 'hype' that once Helen, Tony and Tom were safe it had to be 'the Happy New Year' banner.
IfI was the producer, I'd have hinted at an enormous shock then made a completely run-of-the-mill episode.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 31)
Comment number 32.
At 19:39 2nd Jan 2010, Mary wrote:Only the Archers can do it this way. 'Ups and Downs' all in one episode. However, not as dramatic as the night Grace died, but ... lets wait and see what happens now!!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 32)
Comment number 33.
At 19:39 2nd Jan 2010, happyjennyflower wrote:Actually not so much of a cliffhanger, it has been building up to a storyline involving Nigetl.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 33)
Comment number 34.
At 19:39 2nd Jan 2010, Fiona wrote:Bit of an anti-climax... Unless Nigel landed ON Lizzie?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 34)
Comment number 35.
At 19:42 2nd Jan 2010, tuesdaywash wrote:Oh I am so disappointed! Is that as good as it gets for radio drama? and for a 60th edition that could be replayed? How ridiculous! Where were all the other characters? It was supposed to be an anniversary...I really appeal to the writers - what were you thinking of? Surely you've had time enough to prepare and consider a truly outstanding episode that will stand the test of time in the way The Archers has...a sad day for British radio drama.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 35)
Comment number 36.
At 19:42 2nd Jan 2010, doctorjeffers wrote:Anyway if Nigel is dead, Elizabeth ("I'll scweam and scweam until I'm sick") will definitely blame David, and try and sue him for every penny. Pity Nige didn't oblige by falling on her.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 36)
Comment number 37.
At 19:42 2nd Jan 2010, katiejane1957 wrote:Sorry but it was a bit obvious. However shall really miss Nigel (if indeed he is dead). Could the implications of this be that Elizabeth has a heart attack and then Freddie and Lily are brought up by David and Ruth.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 37)
Comment number 38.
At 19:42 2nd Jan 2010, justpottering wrote:I wish it hadn't been Nigel, but thought he was getting more than usual storylines of late.... poor Lilly'n'Freddy poor Lizzy, that brooch will take on a new meaning now....
And poor David, the guilt will be difficult to live with methinks, and Lizzy will blame him forever now, their relationship has always been a little erm... difficult it will now be impossible and probably irreparable.
not exactly SATTC though - that was more of a wind up than a build up.
jp
Complain about this comment (Comment number 38)
Comment number 39.
At 19:42 2nd Jan 2010, stevie b wrote:I was 'expecting' the Helen storyline and am glad father and daughter are reunited. And my family think I have lost it for shouting at the radio for David and Nigel 'DON'T DO IT- IT IS ANNIVERSARY ADDITION!!' I love the Archers!!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 39)
Comment number 40.
At 19:43 2nd Jan 2010, orange blossom wrote:Maybe he's left everything to a lover we had no idea about...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 40)
Comment number 41.
At 19:43 2nd Jan 2010, Tom Sausage wrote:Not sure how repercussions of Nigel dropping off the roof will rebound through Ambridge for the next 10 years...terrible shame to see him go though - if he has gone of course...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 41)
Comment number 42.
At 19:43 2nd Jan 2010, Thrumgirl wrote:Poor poor Nigel do hope he survives. What would we do without Mr Snowy?? Can't wait for the next episode!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 42)
Comment number 43.
At 19:43 2nd Jan 2010, peejay19 wrote:Great stuff! Lots of teases and a few red herrings (thought Tom was going to crash on the way home at one point). Been listening for ten years and was very excited tonight!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 43)
Comment number 44.
At 19:44 2nd Jan 2010, Katy wrote:No - not Nigel, the only really nice person, with no hidden agenda. Life and Fiction need the nice people!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 44)
Comment number 45.
At 19:44 2nd Jan 2010, happyjennyflower wrote:Do so agree with some of the comments! one could almost misquote Oscar Wilde if Nigel dies "for one daughter to lose a husband is misfortune, for the other to lose a husband is careless!!!"
Complain about this comment (Comment number 45)
Comment number 46.
At 19:44 2nd Jan 2010, Fiona wrote:@doctorjeff... Don't think David can die falling off: the next episode will take place on Monday, remember, not carry on from the moment it finished... Maybe he'll get stuck and not be found, though...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 46)
Comment number 47.
At 19:45 2nd Jan 2010, helenshorrible wrote:Poor Nigel.Not dead but permantly disabled ????
Complain about this comment (Comment number 47)
Comment number 48.
At 19:45 2nd Jan 2010, John G wrote:Poor Nigel - never listen to a man that shoots badgers.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 48)
Comment number 49.
At 19:46 2nd Jan 2010, Karol wrote:I think Henry John would have been nicer.
I can't believe Nigel has died - two sisters losing husbands in accidents - perhaps he will be a bit poorly for a while or at worst unable to walk?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 49)
Comment number 50.
At 19:46 2nd Jan 2010, watchmakerray wrote:What a let down! Take one cheerful, productive and happy character and wipe him out why don't you. Oh the tragic women of Ambridge - but at least they are still alive.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 50)
Comment number 51.
At 19:47 2nd Jan 2010, libraryuser wrote:Family sitting round the radio all expectant and then?....Well not much of anything really, considering that the episode was billed as 'Will change Ambridge for ever'! Not a total waste of half an hour but almost.
LU
Complain about this comment (Comment number 51)
Comment number 52.
At 19:48 2nd Jan 2010, LIB wrote:I foresee an endless search for spinal injury miracle cures.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 52)
Comment number 53.
At 19:49 2nd Jan 2010, rossett52 wrote:Very disappointed. Contrived and obvious what was going to happen.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 53)
Comment number 54.
At 19:49 2nd Jan 2010, parsnips4ever wrote:So we're offered a Buddhist theme. One (hooray) Henry dies and another is born. Also pure alchemy - the marriage of the masculine and feminine principles- after Nigel's triumph as the dame in the panto something like this was inevitable.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 54)
Comment number 55.
At 19:49 2nd Jan 2010, Majorclanger wrote:So that's where Titcombe's spanner went
Complain about this comment (Comment number 55)
Comment number 56.
At 19:50 2nd Jan 2010, Stewart_M wrote:Bit poorly!!. Time lines are real time in the Archers. At best Paralysed and Severe Brain Damage. In COMA for months. I suspect Death.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 56)
Comment number 57.
At 19:50 2nd Jan 2010, Cloud69 wrote:Had a feeling there would be a fall from the roof, following Kenton and Nigel going up there to put the banner up...but will there be a death, perhaps he'll survive but break his back/neck?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 57)
Comment number 58.
At 19:51 2nd Jan 2010, Fiona wrote:@katiejane1957 ... I think there's got to be a chance of Lizzie dying too... But then I'd put my money on Jill getting the kids: we've been fed mini-sub-plots about schools and difference of opinion about how the twins should be brought up...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 58)
Comment number 59.
At 19:51 2nd Jan 2010, LIB wrote:and why didn't any of those livestock farmers know anything about pre-eclampsia?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 59)
Comment number 60.
At 19:52 2nd Jan 2010, Bertie Bear wrote:Very Archers accident but episode totally over hyped for long-term listeners. I suppose killing off whinging Helen was too obvious and too much to ask. Nigel dead. Elizebeth blames David for persuading Nigel to go up and never speaks to him again. But hey all might not be lost. what about Helen will get a fatal dose of MRSA and stop annoying us all. A long shot I know but I live in hope.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 60)
Comment number 61.
At 19:54 2nd Jan 2010, LIB wrote:@Stewart_M he'd be the latest occupant of the 'Nelson Gabriel' slot.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 61)
Comment number 62.
At 19:55 2nd Jan 2010, tea wrote:I've had a lovely day - sobbing along with the Grundy's being evicted - etc. etc. ... but, what an anticlimax! Was fun though - all the red herrings - but, much as we love Nigel, the archers will definitely be just the same next week - not changed for ever!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 62)
Comment number 63.
At 19:55 2nd Jan 2010, dodo wrote:That was a complete cop out and not worthy of the Archers. More worthy of the kind of rubbish that passes for TV Soap on eastenders. Shaken to the core, more like a small shiver. Get a grip The Archers is better than the rubbish we have been served up tonight.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 63)
Comment number 64.
At 19:55 2nd Jan 2010, johnrh wrote:I think Nigel will survive but probably be in a wheelchair .......its all part of the politically correct requirements for programme ......we have Adam and Ian, Helen who is now a single mother by AI, Usha Gupta, and now someone with a disability.........a full set!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 64)
Comment number 65.
At 19:56 2nd Jan 2010, JMR76 wrote:Fabulous storyline, both exciting and poignant. Who but the most flint-hearted was not moved by Tony's lines on becoming a grandfather? Sorry to lose Nigel, but look forward to the schism it will cause in the family and the inevitable burden of death duties. But then...maybe he's not dead and David will save him and sacrifice himself? Looking forward immensely to tomorrow's episode.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 65)
Comment number 66.
At 19:56 2nd Jan 2010, Bluebell wrote:Oh, so Acorn Antiques!!! Ruth's comment after the birth of the baby of "Ah, it's all ended happily" (or words to that effect) whilst Nigel and David were climbing the rickety steps to the roof....priceless! I don't think Nigel's croaked, although the blood curdling scream may prove otherwise! Can't wait for 7pm tomorrow.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 66)
Comment number 67.
At 19:58 2nd Jan 2010, dtc333 wrote:This from wikipedia:
"Recently, Nigel has been concerned about the environment, and is trying to become "green". He has also taken an interest in his family history, particularly in his late Uncle Rupert. Nigel died during the 60th Anniversary broadcast on Sunday 2nd January 2010 in a 30 minute broadcast. He died in an accident from the roof top of Lower Loxely Hall whilst helping David Archer remove a banner, slipping and falling to his death."
Complain about this comment (Comment number 67)
Comment number 68.
At 19:58 2nd Jan 2010, QuincyMD wrote:If he is dead then it opens up storylines for years,
the demise of LoLo
Lizzy wanting her share of Brookfield for her children
F&L not getting to go to the posh school
Guilt stricken David
David and Lizzie at war
etc
etc
etc
If he is seriously injured then there are plenty of stories for future years.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 68)
Comment number 69.
At 19:58 2nd Jan 2010, Ebby wrote:Ooh, a pregnant woman has a baby and somebody dies in a soap opera. Not sure the episode lived up to its hype, but, as one listener has already commented, we don't know the full extent of the flagpole drama until tomorrow's episode. Perhaps he is left hanging, too high to reach, until he dies a slow and painful death, but still is left hanging because the government cuts mean they can't afford to send out a crane to fetch down the body. Now THAT would hang over Ambridge for quite some time.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 69)
Comment number 70.
At 19:58 2nd Jan 2010, Judi Chadaway wrote:It was soooh obvious it was going to be the banner and Nigel, since the banner was mentioned in yesterday's programme...and how many times tonight..The audience is middle England and reasonably intelligent. I think Nigel should have knocked a loose stone off the parapet, which would have crushed Jazar (spelling) as he kissd Fellon whilst they went out for a smoke...having stayed to help clean up the New Year's Day party. Fellon could have been blinded as well...much more unexpected.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 70)
Comment number 71.
At 19:59 2nd Jan 2010, jimbobdanglan wrote:What a dreadful episode. It was obvious what was going to happen as soon as they decided to go up on the roof. It was out of character too for David to do that, Kenton maybe but David would not have ventured up on the roof, he is too careful.
Is that really the best the writers can manage?
But what really annoys me is that the BBC feel that they have to mark the occasion by some major disaster - unnecessary I think.I feel that most listeners will be depressed by the whole thing - sorry BBC, a miss I am afraid.
Now we have weeks of depression ahead of us listening to the ramifications - that is if I can be persuaded to listen to a programme that has metamorphosed into 'Eastenders'
Complain about this comment (Comment number 71)
Comment number 72.
At 20:00 2nd Jan 2010, rosie_sparkle wrote:You cant kill off Nigel - I enjoy him so much - and would much rather lose Lizzie or Helen
I cant bear the idea of the Archers without him, or the family feud that you are obviously now planning
Complain about this comment (Comment number 72)
Comment number 73.
At 20:00 2nd Jan 2010, Silveraven wrote:I'm presuming Nigel is dead, but if there is any way that he can be brought back, even if stupidly contrived, I would be far happier. Most soaps are so lacking in honest, noble, decent, fair-minded, thoughtful, caring, loving individuals like Nigel who might actually inspire listeners, and certainly warm our hearts - and may even provide a positive role model to youngsters listening. So what do you do, you kill off one of the best-ever characters! It really is very tragic. I know it's only a radio show, but the entertainment media is important in shaping the mood and attitudes of the nation. Imagine how much of a better place the UK would be without the doom, gloom, violence and endorsement of bad behaviours and attitudes that is Eastenders! I guess it is too late to bring Nigel back, but please BBC, can you please give us more happy and honourable characters in your soaps - and then let them live!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 73)
Comment number 74.
At 20:00 2nd Jan 2010, Jeremy Lee wrote:Well done, Ms Whitburn - a very 'Archers' bombshell. So, will David go crazy with guilt? Will Elizabeth ever stop blaming Kenton? Did Nigel have life insurance, and will they pay out? What's in store when we discover the contents of the will? Will Lower Loxley stay in the family, or be converted into luxury apartments bringing one era to an end but introducing a whole new (and nouveau) cast of characters? Well done Archers, and vale Nigel. You will be missed.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 74)
Comment number 75.
At 20:01 2nd Jan 2010, LIB wrote:@JMR76 Schism?! The sort of conflicts that create generation-spanning feuds in real life last for about 6 weeks in the Archers. They'll all've kissed and made up by Easter.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 75)
Comment number 76.
At 20:03 2nd Jan 2010, DistantTraveller wrote:Not sure why The Archers feel the need to compete in the hackneyed soap misery stakes. Why does an anniversary need to 'spiced up' with something horrible and depressing? Rather than Nigel, I think the producer should get the chop.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 76)
Comment number 77.
At 20:03 2nd Jan 2010, dmk_53 wrote:Poor Henry! Imagine having Helen for a mother?!? Surely a case for the child protection authorities
Complain about this comment (Comment number 77)
Comment number 78.
At 20:04 2nd Jan 2010, Herefordian-in-exile wrote:SO disappointed that the Beeb succumbed to the obvious 'we have to kill off someone' ploy to mark 60 years. Why lose lovely Nigel? Why not just have a happy storyline for a change? Goodness knows, 2010 has been depressing enough as it is.
And why do so many vocal Archers bloggers, tweeters and message board commentators appear to dislike just about every character, every plot, every script and the director?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 78)
Comment number 79.
At 20:06 2nd Jan 2010, AgateZingyPuffin wrote:When Tony said the baby looks like a Henry our whole family cracked up laughing. Does the baby have a long nose, four wheels, bright colours and suck up dirt?! (Maybe its a hoover)! Also wasn't Nigel holding the end of the banner so he could paraglide down and be perfectly fine.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 79)
Comment number 80.
At 20:07 2nd Jan 2010, Snowpenguin wrote:Could Nigel have taken David with him, attached by the banner. Not so much a cliff-hanger...........
Complain about this comment (Comment number 80)
Comment number 81.
At 20:08 2nd Jan 2010, orange blossom wrote:David untied his end of the banner and we heard the scream as Nigel went down. If David was hanging onto the banner with Nigel dangling on the end he wouldn't have shouted the way he did.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 81)
Comment number 82.
At 20:08 2nd Jan 2010, Carrie_not_Clary wrote:If Nigel has gone, I predict Lizzie and the indulged Freddie and Lily will end up living next to the Horrobins ,having lost the Pargetter family fortune to Death Duties and Borchester Green will be the only option... Good episode -opens up some hefty story lines..I don't mind if you don't use mine..:-)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 82)
Comment number 83.
At 20:09 2nd Jan 2010, Duncan wrote:I like QuicyMD's comments - though I doubt they will happen. Might be Lizzie beating David round the head though!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 83)
Comment number 84.
At 20:10 2nd Jan 2010, hedera wrote:well done archers, I really enjoyed the possible demise of helen as she was really beginning to get to me, and the possibility of her dad going with her in a huge guilt fest, but instead you get rid of an impossible figure, nigel, isn't he the latest in a long line of impossible figures. he is a complete anachronism and it's time he went, who could bare to play it for any longer, and now his kids now won't have to suffer the bullying endemic in the public school system - HOORAH!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 84)
Comment number 85.
At 20:10 2nd Jan 2010, flakey_hill wrote:Awful to loose such a brilliant character as Nigel - if indeed he is lost. I will miss him greatly
And - indeed it does open up a plethora of great story lines.
And / But also - perhaps the actor just wanted to leave the series to go on to other things ? And so Nigel drew the short straw for the Anniversary Spice - so to speak ?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 85)
Comment number 86.
At 20:11 2nd Jan 2010, mistress cullis wrote:The episode was completely spoilt for me by the spoiler posted on the front of The Archers Messageboard which duplicated a thread title 'Nigel not in the cast list'. It's still there now, last time I looked. I would like an answer from Ms. Whitburn as to how this was allowed to happen.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 86)
Comment number 87.
At 20:11 2nd Jan 2010, Toffette wrote:Well it was obvious something was going to happen to Nigel with his panto triumph and endless presents and special moments with Lizzie, however I don't think he's a gonner. I think he's wheelchair bound and that will haunt David forever. Lizzie will be even more unbearable as this will complicate the arrangements over Freddielilys schooling. Lower Loxley will have to be completely adapted for him and Lizzie will discover that under the new government/coalition grants to help them have been cut totally. Eddie will be brought in to install a Wallace and Grommit style system for Nigel to get out of bed in the morning.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 87)
Comment number 88.
At 20:12 2nd Jan 2010, GeofE wrote:I shared the consensus "what a cop-out" view... until I read Paragirl's comment. I shall feel slightly cheered if both Nigel and David fell off - Nigel is harmless, but David can be a right pain. Plus we get to test Felicity Finch's acting talents to the max... can she manage to make the ubiquitous "Oh no..." sound real under such traumatic circumstances?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 88)
Comment number 89.
At 20:13 2nd Jan 2010, Stewart_M wrote:Nigel is in Radio Times Cast list.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 89)
Comment number 90.
At 20:13 2nd Jan 2010, Zabella wrote:I enjoyed it! And I heard the episode when Grace met her maker and have listened ever since. I really hope its not the end of Nigel. Wheelchair??perhaps Why Henry Ian keep the interest going
Complain about this comment (Comment number 90)
Comment number 91.
At 20:13 2nd Jan 2010, Eeeeeek wrote:Well I for one thought it was a sad yet fantastic episode...and I do not for one moment believe that is it...we don't know for sure Nigel has bought it, Helen still isn't out of the woods and may still pop off at any moment leaving ma and pa to bring up little Henry Ian (who we have no idea for sure is fit and healthy), and Jolene has, rather suspiciously, made it through her first Christmas, alone...I think there may be more to come..in only the prefct way that The Archers can do it...with a wee bit of style, thought and time!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 91)
Comment number 92.
At 20:14 2nd Jan 2010, Cadex6 wrote:Well, what can one say? How about that the script writers should have been pushed off the roof whilst holding Helen's hand? Nigel was (and I hope is) a gem, Helen is simply annoying. I do hope that Nigel survives as to 'kill off' such a positive personality goes against the grain when Helen was a nuch more suitable candidate for early death.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 92)
Comment number 93.
At 20:14 2nd Jan 2010, sttcs wrote:I really thought it would be something disastrous happening to Nigel and Lizzie because the scriptwriters have been pushing and pushing their idyllically happy marriage. So something awful had to happen. Shame it was so predictable. I hope he lives!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 93)
Comment number 94.
At 20:16 2nd Jan 2010, bakewell_35 wrote:I am a listener of a mere 51 years. I am so sad, I really enjoyed Nigel's character. Why a tragedy, did we need it? Not a lot makes me cry, but I did.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 94)
Comment number 95.
At 20:17 2nd Jan 2010, AgateZingyPuffin wrote:I like the comment about being politically correct posted by johnrh as it is so true nowadays.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 95)
Comment number 96.
At 20:17 2nd Jan 2010, Lynnwood54 wrote:A little surprising but at least Helen and the baby are safe; please don't kill off either David or Nigel.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 96)
Comment number 97.
At 20:18 2nd Jan 2010, GillyN7 wrote:Well done. Why do most people assume Nigel is dead? It was about time the Archers had a prominent disabled character, so this could be it. We will still have plenty of room for blaming David, Kenton, fighting over Brookfield, Freddie and Lily's education, insurance cover etc etc etc. I had guessed it was going to be Nigel as we'd heard a lot of him in the past few weeks, along with all the lovey dovey stuff with Elizabeth and his triumph in the panto. Helen had to have a healthy baby and all be OK. We couldn't have Pat and Tony going through serious trauma with another of their children. Thoroughly enjoyed the programming on BBC7 today as I caught up with all the Christmas emails. Congrats.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 97)
Comment number 98.
At 20:19 2nd Jan 2010, ROZTHECOB wrote:pLEASE LET NIGEL SURVIVE - HE COULD GO ON TO REPRESENT GB IN EQUESTRIAN PARA-OLYMPICS IN 2012, SO GIVING SCRIPT-WRITERS ANOTHER TOPCIAL STORY.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 98)
Comment number 99.
At 20:19 2nd Jan 2010, Lindsay wrote:This is more than a bit contrived, isn't it? It was SO obvious one of them was going to fall. Not even dozy Nigel would be likely to climb around on a steep frosty roof in the middle of the night, even if Lizzy did want the thing down. Really!!!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 99)
Comment number 100.
At 20:20 2nd Jan 2010, DracoM1 wrote:On mbs, both tonight's apparent 'shocks' were widely predicted literally weeks ago. The epi creaked with the most unlikely coincidences / happenstances. And many MLers have been deeply unhappy about the relentless way in which the whole Helen / baby SL has been driven, including the cosying up with Woman's Hour, thus depriving the outcome of the whole SL of credibility and/or tension. It HAD to be successful given how much was invested in it by both programmes.
This 60th epi has starkly revealed for me sad lapses in editorial judgement.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 100)
Page 1 of 2