Friday 18th March 2011
On tonight's programme with Emily Maitlis:
The focus of the programme will be the Libya conflict. Events are moving fast following last night's UN Security Council resolution authorising all necessary measures to protect civilians from attacks by Colonel Muammar Gaddafi's forces.
In the face of Western powers discussing how to enforce the no-fly zone, Libya's government has declared an immediate ceasefire, with Foreign Minister Mussa Kussa saying that it was intended "to protect civilians".
Tonight, Mark Urban will be bringing us up to date on the latest military plans, Michael Crick will be giving us political analysis of David Cameron's role in pushing for action and we will be discussing the crisis with guests in the studio.
Note that due to Comic Relief we're on air ever so slightly later than usual - at 2238 on BBC Two.

Comment number 1.
At 14:57 18th Mar 2011, Hawkeye wrote:At last, the middle East gets a two-state solution!
(Just a thousand miles West of where it expected one)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 15:18 18th Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:Got this Urge To Urinate and Defacate on any Pile of Bile of guardian garbage I come across
do you think a human right liar would represent me
Are You Kidding I wouldnt Touch any of Them with Yours or A Barge Pole
Its My Human Right Not To Get Infected with That Very Nasty Poxy Brain Dead Diseaze
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 15:21 18th Mar 2011, Jericoa wrote:Gadaffi has been around the block afew times, he knows how to pull the teeth from the international community.
He will take away the international communities excuse, use the oil as a bargaining chip and take his fight against his own people underground, no direct conflict but strategic disapearances of key individuals and occasional stories of horrendous torture and suffering of the families of rebel supporters.
It is abhorent but is that not the way it seems to work.
Funny how there does not seem to be much media comment or profile on the saudi / Bahrain story, potentially a much bigger global impact.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 15:22 18th Mar 2011, Mindys_Housemate wrote:my comments on libya posted yesterday:
66. At 2:24pm on 18 Mar 2011, you wrote:
some background on Libya:
"From its inception, the revolutionary regime placed great emphasis education, continuing and expanding programs begun under the monarchy. By the 1980s, the regime had made great strides, but much remained to be done."
https://countrystudies.us/libya/56.htm
perhaps demonstrating Ghaddafi was educated in Britain?:
"Perhaps most important were lagging enrolments in vocational and technical training. As recently as 1977, fewer than 5,000 students were enrolled in 12 technical high schools. Although unofficial estimates placed technical enrolments at nearly 17,000 by 1981, most doctors, dentists, and pharmacists in the early 1980s still came from abroad. Young Libyans continued to shun technical training, preferring white collar employment because it was associated with social respect and high status. As a consequence, there seemed to be no immediate prospect for reducing the heavy reliance on expatriate workers to meet the economy's increasing need for technical skills. "
[same link]
and this link just puts the icing on the cake. Who could tell that Libyan thinkers were being told the same economic/educational fantasies as our own bunch of misanthropic morons?
https://urdutahzeeb.net/articles/blog1.php?p=4970&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
on the current situation:
https://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2059233,00.html?xid=rss-mostpopular
to cut through some of the black/white BS being sown, here is a rough ranking of US/Western desires in Libya:
1. a new loyal Dictator. Preferably one with the confidence of the Army and Securiat.
2. a new Dictator who can be vilified. Enemies are always useful for propaganda purposes, and this rarely affects actual trade.
3. a civil war that will enable Western Powers to grab control of the oil/resources, selling arms to both sides, and turning back any social advances made in the last few decades.
4. Ghaddafi remain in power. It would annoy them, because Ghaddafi controls the trade deals, and he is unlikely to be very happy with the massive media-attack he, Libya in general, and his family were subjected to. But this is still preferable to Washington, Paris and London than:
5. a genuine democratic social-democracy movement. "Govt of the People, For the People, By the People". The absolute LAST thing despots and Corporates in the West want, because the corruption would be dramatically reduced. Every accurate Historical record shows this adequately. It also, btw, shows that in every case Western populations were lied to deliberately. Just like "Iraq's Liberation" was for Iraqi benefit, remember? This, despite the inevitable rhetoric, is the polar opposite to what Global leaders actually intend: and the same is true in Russia, China, and the other 'Great Power' Imperial nations. Actual democracy, and certainly non-corrupt, popular control of resources gives them the screaming nightmares!
whilst it is amusing to watch Western Leaders and 'in-house' political spokespeople try to manage to maintain this balancing act, it is not amusing watching the actual people in Libya, Bahrain and elsewhere suffering and dying hoping the West will come to their aid.
frankly - look to Gaza. You will see there the facts of Western policy, and the truth behind the misty-eyed rhetoric of freedom and democracy from Western Leaders. Who are busy even now arming the dictators throughout the region.
it would be naive to imagine the USA will give up its Empire as 'easily' as the Soviets collapsed. Sad it is to say it, but the USSR was a more moral beast in many ways than the West is.
and i detest Marxism.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 16:24 18th Mar 2011, JunkkMale wrote:I had rather thought 'the problem' was this geezer killing innocents.
Yet within seconds of him stopping (or at least claiming to), it appeared the entire news contingent decided this was a bad thing and 'we' had played into the wily despot's hands.
I even saw some quickly imported eminence greaseball on the lunchtime news try to claim that him caving (for now) was a possibility 'no one had anticipated'. Uh-huh.
No pleasing some folk.
After the calibre of Japan agenda and ratings obsessed gush, I really hope we might at last get some objective reporting and competent analysis on this, preferably not from a single or paired up couple of extreme axe-grinder 'guests' ported in to say by proxy what the guys behind the glass like the sound of.
What's the betting?
This made me chuckle: '@JohnRentoul Stop The War will be marching this afternoon in opposition to a UN resolution that has just stopped a [civil] war'
I wonder if they'll in any way be egged on by our responsible, impartial broadcast media.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 16:27 18th Mar 2011, Mindys_Housemate wrote:oops, this should have come first, sorry!:
59. At 1:07pm on 18 Mar 2011, you wrote:
no-fly zone, Libya:
here's the Reality: Britain and France have significant Oil deals with Libya worth £Bns each year. The corruption behind those deals is not just Gaddafi creaming off £Bns into his own accounts, but on both sides of these 'back-room deals'. By "freezing" Ghaddafi's assets, Britain and France have ensured those trade deals will likely be revoked, so some very powerful and wealthy 'behind the scenes' people in France and Britain are livid.
the FIRST objective of ingoing troops will be the oil facilities, later perhaps the Museums once the rarest artefacts have been stolen for private collections in Europe or the US, just as in Iraq. THEN the troops will be sent to protect the civilian areas such as Benghazi. Our troops will then directly face the armies of Ghaddafi, who are now inspired to be fighting against "foreign imperialists" - and how will our troops also prevent 'internal' actions against them by Ghaddafi loyalists in the 'safe havens'?
They will not know who to arrest, and they will almost certainly be forced into an "Iraq situation" very quickly. There ARE ways to avoid this however, as there also were in Iraq. BUT they will rely upon our working WITH the rebel PEOPLE, and not just the rebel leaders, many of whom seem amazingly pro-West all of a sudden. Oil wealth can be spread around to other, new, corrupt and brutal dictators, you see.
sorry, more reading:
https://www.utopia-politics.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=4436
to avoid the situation, allow the 'working groups' of the rebels, the actual councils that sprang up to organise after they liberated themselves, to organise. Even to have a direct input to how the Military operates there. The aim should NOT be to find a new 'Strong-Man Leader' to take over, but to redistribute power - and the wealth from the oil-flow - downwards amongst the People. We - and the rebels - must show the rest of Libya that the rebel areas are *really* - 'having it good', *genuinely*! If we go there, we must go as liberators of the People - not the Oil and a new generation of corruption and dictatorship. This will be a brand new concept for Washington, Paris and London, but if they do not take these steps, then in the blink of an eye THIS is what our soldiers will face:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iraq/1501319/Secret-MoD-poll-Iraqis-support-attacks-on-British-troops.html
of course, do these megalomaniacs care about our soldiers lives, or Libyan rebel lives, REALLY?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 16:56 18th Mar 2011, Mindys_Housemate wrote:"5. At 4:24pm on 18 Mar 2011, JunkkMale wrote:
I had rather thought 'the problem' was this geezer killing innocents.
Yet within seconds of him stopping (or at least claiming to), it appeared the entire news contingent decided this was a bad thing and 'we' had played into the wily despot's hands.
I even saw some quickly imported eminence greaseball on the lunchtime news try to claim that him caving (for now) was a possibility 'no one had anticipated'. Uh-huh.
No pleasing some folk."
UK-France "Blast it old chap, the Dastardly Blighter has ended the excuse we needed to invade and secure the oil! Shall we do it anyways? ...Operation Independent Libya sounds like a good new Crusading title, what do you think? The Sunni-OPEC and the Danes will help..."
straight out of the Bush-manual for International Relations.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 17:06 18th Mar 2011, Mindys_Housemate wrote:i wonder if i am allowed to post this *now*, mods?
Subject:
Thursday 24 February 2011
Posting:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12565214
if Israel doesn't sort its [stuff] out and start treating the Palestinians as humans with equal rights, this might have another use quite soon.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-12565586
bet this gets mentioned tonight, bit of light ribbing from the guests i imagine... ;)
------------
i'm sure camoron and sarghosi-le-pen are quite willing to send in the bombers and troops to secure their oil deals, i wonder how willing they are to actually care about the Libyan population though? How many refugees would they accept from Libya is a pretty good yardstick...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 17:17 18th Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:OOPS Don't Tell the Plod,
I just trashed a few guardian comiks .. The Staff Said Done Nowt
As You No Auntie I Live in a Garrison Town .. Glad 2 State my name isnt s bell
Do You Wear Guts for Garters Auntie
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 17:18 18th Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:SYCOPHANTIC CIPHERS ALL - THE HORROR OF WAR, WESTMINSTER STYLE
Jingo bells, jingo bells, jingo all the way, Oh what fun it is to win and fight another day. . .
I am too physically sick of the Westminster Malaise to write more.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)
Comment number 11.
At 17:20 18th Mar 2011, brossen99 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 11)
Comment number 12.
At 17:45 18th Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:10 its better than dyeing and not fighting another day
try picking up a few rotten stiffs for Real with a spoon
Complain about this comment (Comment number 12)
Comment number 13.
At 18:02 18th Mar 2011, brossen99 wrote:It may be no more than pure coincidence or even an " options bounce " but it would appear that BAE Systems share price has risen 3.68% ( second biggest riser on the FTSE today ) since the announcement of the No-Fly zone over Libya.
Given that the Tory party allegedly gets most of its funding from the likes of hedge funds, I can't help speculating as to whether the main aim of the No-Fly ( since its too late ) zone was to increase the theoretical value of the stock market. Since politicians need only disclose share holdings if they own more than 5% of total company assets perhaps cabinet members could be sitting on a fat profit as a result of instituting the No-Fly zone ?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 13)
Comment number 14.
At 19:00 18th Mar 2011, Mistress76uk wrote:Just saw François Picard's debate on France24. Apparently, even though Libya produces 2% of the world's oil, it supplies 70% of Europe.....
Complain about this comment (Comment number 14)
Comment number 15.
At 19:53 18th Mar 2011, jauntycyclist wrote:The Holy Rosenbergs
It is the eve of the funeral of Danny, the eldest Rosenberg son who died fighting for the Israel Defense Force in Gaza. The more extreme elements of Edgware’s Jewish community are threatening to protest at the presence of the dead man’s sister Ruth...
https://www.thestage.co.uk/reviews/review.php/31590/the-holy-rosenbergs
when will cameron ask for a list of the names of uk citizens fighting for israel so they can be prosecuted? when will those organisations in the uk saying its ok to fight for the idf be prosecuted for misleading uk citizens into criminal acts?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 15)
Comment number 16.
At 19:53 18th Mar 2011, brossen99 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-R3S-2vSYNA&feature=feedu
Complain about this comment (Comment number 16)
Comment number 17.
At 20:03 18th Mar 2011, flicks3 wrote:# 10 yes its utterly appalling isn't it . It will cost billions (austerity terrorism on us will pay for it) innocent's will be killed and they're all having a 'big up' with the BBC facilitating events. Sickness.
My nexdoor neighbour and life long friend has just been diagnosed with cancer was just talking with the Macmillan nurse being as he has no family so am pretty much trying to meet difficult events as they happen. Everything is falling away; understanding painting and looking at beautifully dressed women is all I seem to enjoy these days.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 17)
Comment number 18.
At 20:09 18th Mar 2011, brossen99 wrote:Alex Jones opinion banned, so much for the right to free speech in the UK 2011, Corporate Nazi thought police out in force tonight ?????????
Complain about this comment (Comment number 18)
Comment number 19.
At 20:18 18th Mar 2011, jauntycyclist wrote:looks like gaddafi is doing an israel ie saying one thing to misdirect while making 'facts on the ground'?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 19)
Comment number 20.
At 20:46 18th Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:CONCISE - SHREWD - CHILLING (#19)
When I was in business, and up against some pretty perverse commercial behaviours, I realised that to appear (potentially) OUT OF CONTROL, is the only card that trumps perversity. Mad Gaddafi? Or a good learner?
This is the Age of Perversity – led by ‘the West’.
In passing: Yaweh wasn't exactly a saint - was he! (Sorry, just can't write that in present tense.)
Respect Jaunty.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 20)
Comment number 21.
At 20:50 18th Mar 2011, brossen99 wrote:One for barrie
https://imaginativeworlds.com/forum/showthread.php?15074-9-11-The-Dead-Witnesses
Complain about this comment (Comment number 21)
Comment number 22.
At 21:00 18th Mar 2011, brossen99 wrote:Corporate Nazi's alive and well here, wonder when the Tories will suggest we copy it ?
https://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/war-poor-minnesota-republicans-want-b
Complain about this comment (Comment number 22)
Comment number 23.
At 21:17 18th Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:IT HAPPENS ALL THE TIME - PAY NO ATTENTION (#21)
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1317481/Monica-Coghlan-killed-by-robbery-car.html
That sort of thing belongs to bad novels and the minds of those who write them Bro.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 23)
Comment number 24.
At 21:53 18th Mar 2011, Mindys_Housemate wrote:#22: nu-labour/tories brought it in years ago for refugees. I'd give it less than 24 months for the UK. The murdoch press will love it - all those "work-shy scroungers" FORCED to shop at Corporate Tescos - MARVELLOUS!!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 24)
Comment number 25.
At 22:05 18th Mar 2011, flicks3 wrote:When the edge has time its not as emphatic as a stopped time edge, if you wish to paint this is important to know and compensate for otherwise you have a cut-out.
Its worth while looking at the edges that Vincent made - look at that killer criss cross squiggle on top that defines the skull form and informs us he was a brilliant painter.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/84/Skull_with_a_Burning_Cigarette.jpg
Look how Vermeer compensates for the stopped time and removes a definition of the edge to a tonal transition in the features of the face - mouth, nose, eyes.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/66/Johannes_Vermeer_%281632-1675%29_-_The_Girl_With_The_Pearl_Earring_%281665%29.jpg
Complain about this comment (Comment number 25)
Comment number 26.
At 22:46 18th Mar 2011, Sasha Clarkson wrote:In a day when the news was dominated by a potential nuclear catastrophe and possible British involvement in a new war, the 'Sun' chose a story about a "five in a bed romp" by a minor celebrity as its headline story.
This is how it performs its duty of keeping the citizens of our "democracy" informed, before telling them to vote for Rupert's annointed. This is obviously the "circuses" part of "panem et circenses".
Complain about this comment (Comment number 26)
Comment number 27.
At 22:55 18th Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:Wipe Your Grinner with the guardian and the Mirror are your sure 2Become A Grinning WINNER
Your 1st Prize is Fresh Air
Complain about this comment (Comment number 27)
Comment number 28.
At 23:08 18th Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:The People who are Against the Intervention have NO Time for Children and Women, Some of which are Treated Worse than Dogs, I have Seen how They whoever They are Treat Dogs
Sit On That Fence Fatty
Complain about this comment (Comment number 28)
Comment number 29.
At 00:02 19th Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:You can call me Mr DhuWonderfull Auntie .. Dhu for short .. I am A Dog
DogDhu Can Dhu .. Glich OOPS
Move Along Judge Jules Rules
Complain about this comment (Comment number 29)
Comment number 30.
At 04:40 19th Mar 2011, Mindys_Housemate wrote:in 4 days murdoch will gain permanent control of the UK's mass media. Please consider signing this petition:
https://www.avaaz.org/en/murdoch_send_messages/?cl=988149955&v=8675
Complain about this comment (Comment number 30)
Comment number 31.
At 07:46 19th Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:30 Had a Butchers at The PeTiTon
Sorry I Couldnt Sighn it .. Something to do with Damaging our Democracy
Which Democracy would that Be
I would Sign a Petition to Mag 2 Grid Get Rid of Undesirables
It would Save Lives and Your Tax Quids
The UK is a Breeding Ground for Real Filth
You Pay for Real Filth
Not Me Not Now Not EVER
Complain about this comment (Comment number 31)
Comment number 32.
At 07:53 19th Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:The Amount of Bread Raised By Red Conk Day Is Stunning
I am Sorry but I Keep coming back To The Missing Buckshee Billions Gone Diffy in Haite
That Buck does Not Rest With Me It Rests with Ye
That Buck does not Stop With Me It Stops with Ye
Find That Ye .. X marks The Spot .. Buried Billions
Complain about this comment (Comment number 32)
Comment number 33.
At 08:20 19th Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:My Patron Saint is St Andrew My Brothers Name Is Neil
St Andrews X .. A Kiss of Life .. A Kiss of Death
A Kiss of Death 2 REAL FILTH
Complain about this comment (Comment number 33)
Comment number 34.
At 08:28 19th Mar 2011, Sheridan wrote:I am almost an addict of Newsnight and a great fan of Emily Maitlis who usually has total control over what are in general good interviews. But I found her chairing of the discussion between the French Amassador at the UN, an American Senator and Douglas Alexander last night both irritating and offensive. I have complaints. First why when speaking to the Fernch Ambassador did she refer to President Sarkozy as simply Sarkozy and similarly when she was speaking to the American Senator she referred to President Obama as Obama. Is this necessary? Particularly when addressing a representative of the country of whose President she is speaking, would it not be more approrpiate and courteous to refer to the leaders of those countries using their titles rather than just their surnames. My second gripe is just about sloppyness. Which I do not excpect either from Newsnight or Emily Maitles. Douglas Alexander is not, as she introduced him, the shadow foreign affairs minister. He is of course the Shadow Foreign Secretary and as such his views have more weight and significance than a mere junior shadow foreign office minister would have.It is also just plain wrong. Civil courtesies, which set the tone of a debate and reliable information should be the benchmarks of Newsnight and as an ardent regular viewer I find it so disappointing.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 34)
Comment number 35.
At 08:38 19th Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:Talking of Andrew Neil
His Last 2 Guests .. The Fashion Designer .. %100 Behind Her
I used To Swim in The North Sea as A Child .. Wayward Particles Prevent
(brass monkey weather) DoomRay .. Dunnet Head .. Duncansby Head .. Your Off Your ED
The Naughtie Writer I Love Her (%100 Behind Her)I Do .. I am Naughty ish
Savage Lessens To Be Learned on Nuke Power
There Are Real Filth which would if Could Use Nuke at The Drop of a Hat
Agree .. Disagree
TACK Yer Pick
Complain about this comment (Comment number 35)
Comment number 36.
At 08:54 19th Mar 2011, flicks3 wrote:'its in our interests'
oh really, who exactly would 'our'
be
Would 'our' be the general public who have been sold massively short by YOU Mr Cameron who decided it would be a good idea to 'bail' (dole money) out bankers who acted in a massively fraudulent way with all methods of fraud IN PLACE and transfer the perceived criminality to the poor by placing focus on benefits and the lazy unemployed being in bed till midday, the picture painted by Mr Osborne. How about you paint us a picture of liars loans; credit default swaps; collateralised debt obligations; naked short selling and the big long time fraud; the one and only - Fractional Reserve Banking. Come on lets have a picture of who 'OUR' is .
Complain about this comment (Comment number 36)
Comment number 37.
At 09:24 19th Mar 2011, flicks3 wrote:Outstanding interview on fraud-closure and banks
https://kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/Broadcast/Entries/2011/3/19_Chris_Whalen.html
So come on who is 'OUR'
Complain about this comment (Comment number 37)
Comment number 38.
At 09:34 19th Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:36 The Missing Billions .. The Missing Memory
Warnings on The Its The Econenemy Stupid Were Blasted Out Over Ten Years Ago
Did You/Do You .. Miss Your Float/Boat
Eye Didnt
Complain about this comment (Comment number 38)
Comment number 39.
At 09:54 19th Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:Motoring Bike Weather .. Rugby this Aft .. Wooden Spoon Get Lost
ThanX for The Mammories Auntie
Complain about this comment (Comment number 39)
Comment number 40.
At 10:39 19th Mar 2011, Mistress76uk wrote:Hamas emboldened by Cairo's recognition, strikes Israel with 50 mortars
https://www.debka.com/article/20782/
Hizballah is behind the Bahrani revolt, and Iran is arming The Muslim Brotherhood.
https://www.debka.com/
Do I support Colonel Gadaffi - yes
Do I support Bahrain - yes
Do I support Saudi Arabia - yes
Not because I believe in their ideology - but because I believe in the stability of the Middle East. Look at Egypt - you've got rid of Mubarak - now you're going to be replacing him with The Muslim Brotherhood - as armed and funded by Hizbullah. You really think that is going to bring peace, stability and democracy? Dream on.
Ah and also wanted to add that The Muslim Brotherhood is starting it's biggest revolt against Syria too..........
Complain about this comment (Comment number 40)
Comment number 41.
At 11:21 19th Mar 2011, Sasha Clarkson wrote:@40 What you post doesn't make sense in terms of the religion and complex history of the region. The Muslim Brotherhood is a Sunni organisation, and it would not make sense for Iran to arm/support it - certainly not against its own Shia allies in Syria. Gaddafi too is a Shiite of sorts, and has been an Iranian ally.
As for stability - the reason the region is unstable is because of decades of repression. A suitable analogy would be a superheated liquid which appears to be stable, but only needs a slight shock to boil over. What you want to do is jam the lid back on the kettle and carry on heating.
Don't trust the fantasies and gross simplifications of your Israeli factional propaganda websites. I doubt whether inforned Israelis whould believe them either!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 41)
Comment number 42.
At 11:26 19th Mar 2011, Sasha Clarkson wrote:@41 Addendum:
https://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/2137.htm
This is how Gaddafi sees the world.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 42)
Comment number 43.
At 11:48 19th Mar 2011, Mistress76uk wrote:@ Sasha #41* - Very funny! You do realise that MEMRI is "A Vital Component in the U.S. War on Terror" Source: https://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/https://www.memri.org/assistingamerica/
In other words, you are merely reading US propoganda..........remember Iraq and it's so called WMDs? Deja vu? :p
Complain about this comment (Comment number 43)
Comment number 44.
At 11:49 19th Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:SEE AND RAISE (#41)
Hi Sasha. Does your caveat go far (deep) enough?
I now reckon that reality - any reality - is generally (at least) three layers below the overt.
e.g. Might 'Faction X' be encouraged (like the opponents of Saddam) to rise up, with the INTENT that they should fail?
I blame Brer Rabbit. (And who took up the story as a film?!)
LOVE the super-heated liquid analogy! Did you read my one about nuclear only yielding when its unstable?
Interesting times.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 44)
Comment number 45.
At 11:59 19th Mar 2011, Mistress76uk wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 45)
Comment number 46.
At 12:00 19th Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:WARRING TRIBES ARE NEVER FAR AWAY (#42)
When our media referred to Saddam's 'tribe', or now to that of Gaddafi, I sense they think such is archaic - primitive. I suggest tribalism is all around in Parliament and football for a start.
The Ape Confused by Language is fundamentally tribal. 'Global' is a cerebral mad-dream (and a nightmare to the wise). The EU is, of course, just plain barmy.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 46)
Comment number 47.
At 12:05 19th Mar 2011, Mistress76uk wrote:OK, my comment at #45 (condensed):
The Muslim Brotherhood UNIFIES both SHIA AND SUNNI Islam. It wishes to establish a Caliphate.
Source: https://www.ikhwanweb.com/article.php?id=28217
Complain about this comment (Comment number 47)
Comment number 48.
At 12:12 19th Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:HOW MANY LAYERS IN 76?
With reference to my post #44: It is clear that '76' has long operated in 'Jeremy-Lover' mode (requiring simple spinal reflex, and no cerebral function) but has now emerged as politically, finely tuned, and astute! THAT IS JUST TWO LAYERS.
LEVEL 3: CIA? Or might '76' be Eliza Manningham-Buller enjoying retirement?
Watch that space Sasha . . .
Complain about this comment (Comment number 48)
Comment number 49.
At 13:25 19th Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:ED MILIBAND IS NARROWLY AGAINST DEATH - AND THE AGE OF PERVERSITY LIVES.
Limited Ed is adamant that Gaddafi is NOT ALLOWED to kill his own people.
However, when we have civilised Libya, they will realise the error of their ways, in failing to TAX the process of killing one's own people.
Take a look at the tobacco and alcohol death statistics in Britain AND THE PATHETIC PRETENCE AT CONTROLS. (Consider, also, the number slumped in a chair, with an Oxygen bottle their best friend . . .)
Will Gaddafi kill as many as Westminster's finest? (And that is not counting 'Just War' killing of Johnnie Foreigner'.)
Weep perverse, perfidious Britain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 49)
Comment number 50.
At 13:42 19th Mar 2011, Mindys_Housemate wrote:barry, still finding new layers... was helped in that by someone who kin*ly pointed me 2 Wards merovingia. ("10 mins that way", with an Persia akkksent).
the rabbit hole keeps on going down, Gods AlOne knows how high it will go. :/
#40 mistress: well, you ARE a Tory after all. In the Interests of Stability, would you also approve of London machine-gunning the People on British streets?
btw, do you know the history of the name "Tory"? It came from the Irish 'Torigh' (or similar), and was attached to British Tax-collectors, who of course used the tax taken to pay for the colonial occupation, and removal of rights from those very same Irish farmers and people. Being forced to pay tax for the enrichment of wealthy Lords, and your own oppression - by Tories.
not much changes, i guess.
no wonder they hate the idea of transparency in Govt. Both the Tories and Tory-lite.
last night's show very good, obviously still on a topic in progress however. Was very revealing to learn from the french minister that what Lord Cameron claimed was a "success" for him was nothing of the sort - the UK and France had been aiming for the 'right' to "regime change", not to defend the population as camoron claimed.
as he stated, repeatedly, with as much conviction as he is able to muster when he doesn't really believe his words, that there would be NO British soldiers placed on the ground, will he then give his assurance to the House, and the Public, that the same day the first British body-bag comes back from Libya, he will resign as PM, and the Leader of the Tories, and call a general election?
not that i completely disagree with British troops being deployed to defend civilians under attack, but to show to the Country that David Cameron is a Leader who does not want to push the UK into yet ANOTHER war, and if it happens, then he will lay his career on the line, apologise, and go. Of course "Honourable" is merely an ironic nod these days, and certainly means little to the current Govt.
strange report from the BBC:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-12793919
"Pro-Gaddafi forces have attacked the Libyan rebel stronghold of Benghazi and their tanks have entered the city, a BBC journalist witnessed.
A jet also appears to have been shot down over the city despite a declared ceasefire and a UN no-fly resolution."
later, same report:
"A rebel spokesman was quoted as saying the downed jet was a rebel plane which had been shot down by pro-government forces."
hmmm. Spin? Then:
"The BBC's Ian Pannell saw the government tanks on a bridge inside Benghazi at around 1030 (0830 GMT)."
really? INSIDE the city? Yet the rebels have tanks and artillery in defensive positions around the city, according to reports this week? Were the tanks being fired on by the city's defenders?
"On Friday, Col Gaddafi's government declared a unilateral truce but there were reports that government offensives in rebel-held towns were continuing,"
and as we heard on NN last night, the rebels will keep fighting. Hell, wouldn't you, considering Ghaddafi's threats? So is continued fighting really that surprising?
"But a Libyan government spokesman said there had been "no attacks whatsoever on Benghazi".
"As we said, we are observing the ceasefire and we want international observers to come," said the spokesman, Mussa Ibrahim."
who is lying? Every side, probably. "The first casualty of war is Truth".
i think anyone who has even a shred of morality would like this to end now as quickly, and as peacefully, with as little loss of life as possible. So it would be appreciated if reporters make sure of their facts before sending possibly inflammatory reports, please.
is it really so much to ask???
Complain about this comment (Comment number 50)
Comment number 51.
At 14:10 19th Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:THE TROUBLE WITH PLANES THAT LEAVE THE SKY (#50)
Lockerbie - two (out of three) towers, Pennsylvania hole - Pentagon and now Libya.
Put not your trust in Planes bearing myths.
History used to be bunk. Now it is debunked bunk that has already been debunked before!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 51)
Comment number 52.
At 14:40 19th Mar 2011, Sasha Clarkson wrote:@43, @47. Having watched his career for decades, I've no doubt that the MEMRI quotation is an adequate translation of what Gaddafi said. It's also consistent with the Maghreb version of Ismaili Shia Islam.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ismailism
Calls for a new Caliphate are typical of Sunni fundamentalism - the outlook is as incompatible with Shia as Roman Catholicism is with Calvinism. I'm not comparing any Christian doctrine with a Muslim one - just the depth of the philosophical gulf. When the Pope calls for Christian unity, it's unity on HIS terms!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 52)
Comment number 53.
At 15:02 19th Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:ECUMENISM – ‘TWAS EVER THUS (#52)
I always smile, reflexively, when Pope and Arch of Cant meet. And now we have Dave, as Pope ('I look down on him') and Nick, as A of C ('I am taken in by him').
I know nothing of Sunni/Shia, but I know we are one species - the rest is inevitable (I have read my Milgram, Zimbardo and Berne).
I wonder if World Leader, Dominant Dave, would know what I am on about.
'HE ALTERS HIS OWN LIKENESS!' Just how removed from reality is that?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 53)
Comment number 54.
At 15:07 19th Mar 2011, Mistress76uk wrote:@ Sasha #52 - Using Wikipedia as a quote? Oh come now. Very amateur! If you bothered to look at https://www.ikhwanweb.com/
you would see that it is the OFFICIAL English Language site of The Muslim Brotherhood.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 54)
Comment number 55.
At 15:26 19th Mar 2011, Mindys_Housemate wrote:#48: barry, "76"?
as i have understood it, the main distinction, avoiding theological dispute, between Sunni and Shia, is the Shia are more prone towards individual enlightenment, and messianic tendencies, whereas the Sunni are more towards 'what is written' - fundamentalism, in its proper sense.
however these differences are far smaller than those within Christendom, probably because the notion of a "Pope" is rejected within Islam, and anyone who has studied the activities and proclivities of the Papal Throne over the centuries can easily understand why. Thus there has never been the 'need' for massive warfare to allow for different opinions within Islam.
one of the recent problems causing Shia versus Sunni is that the Colonial authorities preferred to utilise the Sunni 'royal' families to rule their new territories, as the Shia tended to be more fiercely pro-independence, following the tendency to support Individuality, and not accept oppression, causing many problems for the western powers.
thus the current situation is not so much "Sunni v Shia", but simple revolt against oppression by ruling groups, who happen to be Sunni. The religious element is quite small.
much of the 'inter-faith' conflict in Iraq was deliberately started by the West in its occupation, Divide and Conquer still very much in use.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 55)
Comment number 56.
At 15:49 19th Mar 2011, brossen99 wrote:My #16 is live now after being referred for the duration of last night's propaganda exercise, but after what was said on Dateline London today the BBC probably had no excuse not to show it.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 56)
Comment number 57.
At 15:50 19th Mar 2011, kevseywevsey wrote:mindywindywhoblowsatwindmills at 50 wrote:
"#40 mistress: well, you ARE a Tory after all. In the Interests of Stability, would you also approve of London machine-gunning the People on British streets?"
That there quote is the usual standard issue retort from them hatefilled Guardian reading neo-leftist, Marxist-Stalinists, Polpotters, Che Guevara and Mao Zed-dung reverence society members and haters of themselves - because mummy wouldn't buy them an ice cream on that day out to Bournemouth when they were young and it left them traumatised...libs
Like I've always said:
Liberalism is a mental disorder and should be treated as such.
and only in that self-hating Guardian newspaper would you find a cartoon having a dig at the good people of Wootten Basset. Though we won't be burning his cartoons in the streets and asking for blood, because we are a Christian country and believe in the right to freedom of speech and expression - though because of the mindset of the average Guardian reader and them in the media -especially the BBC - them days are coming to an end with the fostering and rise of Islam in this country...and all thanks to the illness that is Liberalism and its media arm the BBC.
https://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cartoon/2011/mar/17/steve-bell-on-wootton-bassett
Mindywindy...can you blow a bit harder. As the east coast wind has dropped again...cheers buddy:)
Looking forward to your response but don't bother with the race card anymore mindy...that one doesn't work anymore. Try something original eh and not a cut-n-paste job. And try and get out of the house a bit more..its spring time and the sun out.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 57)
Comment number 58.
At 16:14 19th Mar 2011, Mindys_Housemate wrote:"A US judge in Wisconsin has issued a temporary restraining order blocking the state's new collective bargaining law from taking effect."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-12791155
these people are madmen. Good luck to the American People in getting rid of them.
what kind of politicians deliberately star wars, send their armies out to occupy other countries, ramp up Military spending over 300%, hand over $Tns to the Banks and Corporations, and then cut incomes for normal families to pay for it all?? Oh, wait...
--------
"ISPs defend plans for two-tier net
...They argue that if content providers want to pay to get their traffic prioritised on the network, then they should be allowed to do so.
But some content owners and digital activists such as Open Rights Group argue that such a policy would do long-term damage to the internet, which was always conceived as a platform for everyone - not just those with deep pockets."
this is an incredibly important debate, for it opens the possibility that the user will no longer be able to access the whole Net - only that part of it that pays the users ISP to have its content accessible.
in other words, if you are with Sky as your ISP, and the BBC refuses to pay extra to Sky to have IPlayer accessible for Sky ISP customers, then Sky can refuse to allow its paying customers access to the BBC IPlayer.
so Sky would get paid both by the customer (you), paying for internet access, but it then can turn around and demand payment from content providers as well! To put this another way, if YOU are running a web-site, then you would have to pay your ISP extra to have that web-site accessible to others! This is in complete opposition to the spirit of the Net, and allows ISPs to control what you are able to look at, and what you are able to broadcast.
so you might end up paying Sky, or BT etc for Broadband access, only to find you are restricted to surfing only upon their own sites!! You might find your ISP refuses to allow youtube, or facebook - unless those services cough up to the ISP.
to put this yet another way, in China, Iran etc, the Internet is policed by the State, who controls what you are allowed to access and read. In these proposals, it is the ISP corporations who will get that power over the citizens.
now, [shudders], in a nightmare situation and a rogue Govt allows Murdoch to purchase Sky, that would allow *him* to decide what media *you* the user can access on the internet....
exactly. Fairly important stuff, even if it seems a bit dry.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 58)
Comment number 59.
At 16:18 19th Mar 2011, Mindys_Housemate wrote:#57: aww, a fan, how sweet!
[pats little kev on the head]
Complain about this comment (Comment number 59)
Comment number 60.
At 16:42 19th Mar 2011, brossen99 wrote:https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00zvf33/Dateline_London_19_03_2011/
Complain about this comment (Comment number 60)
Comment number 61.
At 16:52 19th Mar 2011, kevseywevsey wrote:windymiller at 59.
So your not taking the bait today.
You'll have to stand on a chair if you want to give me a pat on the head.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 61)
Comment number 62.
At 17:10 19th Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:ONE DAY EVERYONE WILL BE PERMITTED TO TELL GADDAFI TO GO FOR 15 MINUTES.
Politicians really do not live in this world. I have now seen the long and the short and the tall - rigid with state sponsorship - intoning 'GO'.
Obama, Hillary, Limited Ed, Billy the Spud. Dave, Nick (last as usual).
Do they not realise they are acting like playground bullies, who have found a victim, and are taking it in turns to taunt and hit - escalating with each 'go'? This is not mature, adult behaviour. If this were Gilbert and Sullivan or Dickens (why have I used 'if'?) there would be one character whose job was to bully on behalf of all the leaders of this Coalition of the Self-Aggrandising. Let's call him 'Pinchpunch Lunchmoney'.
But the top men (and even Hillary - more a man than Bill) HAVE NO IDEA HOW RIDICULOUS THEY LOOK. I just hope the Space Aliens are not watching.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 62)
Comment number 63.
At 17:18 19th Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:PSSST - WHAT'S THE ISRAELI TALLY OF FLOUTED UN RESOLUTIONS NOW?
Dutch bloke adamant that one just doesn't flout UN resolutions.
Er - racism?
Nuff sed.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 63)
Comment number 64.
At 18:15 19th Mar 2011, jauntycyclist wrote:for Libya to become another iraq there would have to be no plan for the aftermath with no funding in place to pay civilians to keep services going and no single minister responsible.
iraq was a mess not because of the military campaign but the political one. So the mere presence of troops is not the problem in these cases. its the lack of planning and funding going forward.
it seems people still don't get what made iraq a mess and confuse troops with the political incompetence of having no plan and no funding.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 64)
Comment number 65.
At 19:41 19th Mar 2011, Mindys_Housemate wrote:#62: annoying Ghaddafi enough to push him to do something stupid? Most probable. And if he doesn't, well, something can be done and blamed on him anyway. Like Lockerbie.
its hardly surprising Ghaddafi doesn't want a no-fly zone, considering the Western Powers hard-on for assassinations. One tent, one drone, one bomb, new dictator. Simple. Pity we can't gene-tailor a virus for psychopathology. A lot of the world would have to have sudden elections.
no doubt Libya will keep the other, more favoured dictators off the news. GOO GOO, LOOK AT THOSE SHINY JETS BOMBING OUR ENEMIES!!! GOO GOO GOOO!!!!!
#63: you don't imagine that we are all "equal before the law", do you?
#65: iraq was planned that way. There were enough experienced US generals warning about what WOULD happen, and the immense profits for Halliburton from exactly what DID happen, to make it unlikely there was much surprise when it actually happened. Having said that, the ability of the Human Race to convince itself of the most ludicrous ideas truly knows no bounds...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 65)
Comment number 66.
At 20:07 19th Mar 2011, Mindys_Housemate wrote:#34: curiously, both Emily and Kirsty seem to get younger and more adorable every week, love to know how they manage it!! ;)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 66)
Comment number 67.
At 20:21 19th Mar 2011, Mindys_Housemate wrote:brossen, earlier link:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8378522/For-every-new-green-job-nearly-four-are-lost.html?sms_ss=facebook&at_xt=4d7c94818b027e6f%2C0
as opposed to how much the banks take out? The deregulation of Banking, allowing the uniting of high-street and 'investment' banking, effectively allows the banks to drain the UK of money - all apparently legally. This is a very real drain upon the rest of the economy. What would YOU prefer, investment in proper jobs manufacturing energy sources, or allowing unregulated financier-gamblers to blow all the Nation's money? And i would be interested to look at the figures this claim is based upon.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 67)
Comment number 68.
At 20:42 19th Mar 2011, brossen99 wrote:It would appear that the Yanks have bombed Libya with cruise missiles but perhaps the No-Fly zone is just an excuse for the Corporate Nazi's to wreck the infrastructure. The whole object of the exercise being to force whoever eventually takes over Libya to borrow from the Banks to fix it all. Then the people of Libya ( who its supposed to be in the interest of ) will get nothing from future oil revenue because it will all go on interest and paying back the loans ?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 68)
Comment number 69.
At 20:43 19th Mar 2011, flicks3 wrote:https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/rembrandt-portrait-of-hendrickje-stoffels
Rembrandt worked out how edges are transformed by stopped time and a canvas - rectangle visual concentration - extremely well mid to late in his life. As Vermeer the brilliance is in the very delicate modification so one reality can be conveyed by another. Others didn't understand so well if at all.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 69)
Comment number 70.
At 21:00 19th Mar 2011, Mindys_Housemate wrote:#68: yes. Horrible being smart, isn't it?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 70)
Comment number 71.
At 21:12 19th Mar 2011, flicks3 wrote:Very worthwhile listening to Webster Tarpley's take on our latest war venture:-
https://tarpley.net/world-crisis-radio/
click under this on Webster's site :-
'Subscribe to the GCN RSS Feed'
Complain about this comment (Comment number 71)
Comment number 72.
At 22:06 19th Mar 2011, brossen99 wrote:Corporate Nazi shadows of World War Two ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJ3JiZBP5Vs
Complain about this comment (Comment number 72)
Comment number 73.
At 22:36 19th Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:"NECESSARY LEGAL AND RIGHT" - HAS A 'FINAL SOLUTION' RING TO IT . . .
I feel sure a certain megalomaniac German leader saw his industrial killing as necessary, legal and right. He (too) had a vision of a better world, and saw killing people as a way of achieving it. And our Tony - how he loved the verbal triplet, on his way to the destruction of untold Iraqis. Remember 'extensive, detailed and authoritative'.
Recently, Dave employed the word 'feeble' to swat Limited Ed; well Dave, to me, 'necessary legal and right' comes across as illusory, venal and trite. In a word: 'feeble'.
That Dave has seen fit to tell us the killing is legal, is significant. That he feels the need to qualify 'legal' with 'right' is worrying. That the action is deemed necessary is a matter of opinion - nothing more.
Overall, is Dave saying this is NOT like Tony's adventure: unnecessary, illegal and wrong? Perhaps he doth protest too much.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 73)
Comment number 74.
At 22:52 19th Mar 2011, flicks3 wrote:# 73
Absolutely
Complain about this comment (Comment number 74)
Comment number 75.
At 22:58 19th Mar 2011, Mindys_Housemate wrote:the Meedja jeered at the US and Britain for "allowing" Ghaddafi to fight a civil war, and now we will see the consequences of that as possibly hundreds of thousands eventually dead, and millions of refugees. Assassinating Ghaddafi wouldn't now make the blindest bit of difference - it would be a maniac who believes now the West has started bombing Libya, that anyone else who takes charge could make the Ghaddafi loyalists change course. It is very hard now to see any other result than escalation.
and indeed, we shall see little of Bahrain and the other pro-Western fascist dictators on the news from now on.
war, blood and slaughter, no doubt the Americans and Murdoch's slavish followers, are already glued to their TVs to watch the latest 'barbarians slaughtered' gladiatorial games. Whilst mouthing platitudes of Peace and Democracy, naturally.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 75)
Comment number 76.
At 05:07 20th Mar 2011, Mindys_Housemate wrote:Hill dreams of having the Barabbas role,
already having a corrupt and malignant soul.
But understandeth not the Catholic rewriting,
upon HIS flesh the whips eventually toll.
do malignancy, deliberate lies and evil win,
on the Planet with its love of sin,
or do those who now lie wake up and enjoy
throwing the plans and schemes into the bin.
turning to the Light and telling the truth
a balm for every soul, and that is forsooth
one only, is all it takes,
leaving the liar's cabal, as misanthropes uncouth.
honesty is this World's Redemption,
hatred and Love, not even exemptions
in every Human's hand the future lies,
every deliberate untruth, Evil infliction.
without Honesty, the evil ones win,
not explaining reality, also destroys kin.
no future for Mankind on this planet
when all hearts are manufactured from tin.
https://www.emergingtruths.com/jesus_and_barabbas/jesus_and_barabbas.html
i am no Jesus, but some stories go beyond time. And some stories recreate themselves, even if originally largely allegorical. Would *YOU* trust someone who's favourite 'hero' was Sylar, from 'Heroes'? I didn't.
without liars, there would have been no invasion of Iraq, the Middle East would not be in flames, we would already have in place sustainable energy, and trustable politicians. Without liars, there would have been no WW1 or WW2, no Vietnam, not even any colonial Empires. Without liars, this would be a paradise world, and we would be exploring others. Such a little thing, lying, yet with such enormous consequences for us all.
its a shame so few can destroy everything for everyone else. Its a shame some think that lying is acceptable "for the greater good". I guess its a shame it looks like Mankind is about to wipe itself out. The souls of liars, and the souls of truth-speakers could not be more different. I wonder if this has something to do with 2012/2016?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 76)
Comment number 77.
At 05:50 20th Mar 2011, Mindys_Housemate wrote:i wonder how long you will sit on #76, mods? :)
here is wonderful clarity from the same website:
https://www.emergingtruths.com/the_sodomites/the_sodomites.html
Complain about this comment (Comment number 77)
Comment number 78.
At 07:25 20th Mar 2011, Mistress76uk wrote:Sense by Peter Hitchens :o)
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1367993/PETER-HITCHENS-Why-just-let-Libyans-fight---make-friends-winners.html
Complain about this comment (Comment number 78)
Comment number 79.
At 08:28 20th Mar 2011, Mindys_Housemate wrote:@#76, still not posted: mods, how can anyone trust someone who deliberately takes part in a mind-game to prevent someone from knowing and therefore understanding, and therefore being able to change their situation? Who would trust someone who gets others to deliberately lie, or avoid telling essential truths to someone else - how could it be possible to trust such a person, how would you ever know whether they are telling YOU the truth? Indeed, such people are surely to be trusted even LESS than most people? Common sense would indicate so?
if 3 people come to you to try to convince you to lie to a 4th, is it not most likely the reason they give *you* is also based upon lies? Even if 1 or two of the 3 are actually honest in their belief, it only indicates there is an originator of the lie in the 3rd. NEVER trust people who try to get you to lie to others, and if you have any sense never trust their words again afterwards once they have tried. It took me 16 years to learn that valuable lesson, and i learned it the extremely painful way.
these people are nothing except pure poison, on every level. It might take a while to realise what they are, but never again trust them afterwards.
if we applied to same rule to politicians, we might even end up with decent ones. Politicians you would actually like to have as friends, friends you could trust as politicians. This seems far too rare an event, for a species that has invented and stockpiled vast numbers of WMD.
Mankind will survive or fall by its own morality.
------------
STN shall weep if Mankind DOES destroy itself. God would be unhappy. Which element of Mankind therefore, is seeking our own destruction?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 79)
Comment number 80.
At 08:35 20th Mar 2011, Mindys_Housemate wrote:#78: damn, i agree with hitchens. (or could it have been the other way around? I will undoubtedly never know). Last week i agreed with much of Kelvin McKensie's rants!
Now i *know* WE ARE ALL DOOMED!! :'(
Complain about this comment (Comment number 80)
Comment number 81.
At 10:23 20th Mar 2011, flicks3 wrote:Yesterday I went on one of my little art trips, this one was Lichfield cathedral with my friend Jo. She has placed a 50p fine on me for every time I mention the word 'bank' yesterday cost me 20 quid and she decided it wasn't worth the money and so produced gaffer tape and threatened to tape up my gob on the way back. Yep we're doomed totally doomed.
Anyways what Ive found is that many art places are now scrambling for funds and you get 'approached' usually by a smiling middle aged vestal virgin who is totally intend on mugging you. I just walked straight past this women on the entrance to the cathedral, of course I could explain why bankers had done this to them but then Jo produces 'the tape' little did I know Ms Vestal Virgin had a sonic organ weapon waiting to attack when we got it far enough in. Absolutely thunderous organ music started up , no kidding we ran to get out past Ms Vestal Virgin gently smiling/laughing at us .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sleepingchildren.jpg
Complain about this comment (Comment number 81)
Comment number 82.
At 11:33 20th Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:'ODYSSEY DAWN' - A LITTLE HELP HERE?
Would some classics scholar care to unpick 'Odyssey Dawn' for me?
I wonder just WHO came up with it, and what it might tell us (if anything) of the true attitude behind the Libyan adventure.
I remember my horror when the import of 'Shock and Awe' hit me; viz: TERROR. Never did hear who came up with that, but I'll bet Dubya LOVED IT.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 82)
Comment number 83.
At 11:47 20th Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:TWO CAN PLAY AT WONDERFUL CLARITY MORK (#77 link)
I don't know how you got into this area, but there is one clear anomaly where 'man made in god's image' is concerned. Had God intended male-male COUPLING, He would have fitted the male with a designer 'organ of reception'.
This morning, The Big Questions (BBC 1) discussed homosexual marriage as an adjunct to defection from C of E to Rome. Right in the middle of the studio, were two bull elephants AND NO ONE NOTICED!
As the sea shanty goes: "I never seen de like since I bin born, a big buck 'ethnik' with his sea-boots on . . ." Elephants abound!
We are such a cowardly lot.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 83)
Comment number 84.
At 12:03 20th Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:CHOOSING THE MANAGEMENT (#79)
What are you doing Mork! Your post requires focused thought . . .
Westminster's ethos is akin to:
(1) A beauty contest judged by the visually impaired.
(2) Great Tit choosing strategy (a big chest-stilpe is all).
(3) Divide and fail.
(4) A good liar is better than a bad liar.
(5) A club for those whom no other club would have as a member.
Yeah - doom it is Mork.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 84)
Comment number 85.
At 13:18 20th Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 85)
Comment number 86.
At 13:31 20th Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:"NO QUALIFIED SUPPORT WILL BE ACCEPTED" - NOTE THE FUTURE TENSE!
Liam Fox said the above to Anne Leslie, when challenged over judicious non-intervention in Bahrain.
BUT THE DEAL IS CLEARLY - DONE (past tense). As Fox (note the name) spoke, there was a smile (smirk) in the corners of his eyes.
POLITICS: 'The art of self deception, wrapped in the craft of deceiving others - for their own good.'
MILITARY INTERVENTION: The application of death and destruction to avoid death and destruction. (Only allowed by ethical states, if dispensed upon Johnnie Foreigner in his own land.)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 86)
Comment number 87.
At 13:43 20th Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 87)
Comment number 88.
At 14:05 20th Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:THE STRANGENESS OF BLOGKIND (#85 - #87)
Utterly bemused of Newbury.
TOPIC: Libya intervention and reporting of same.
COMMENT: New use of 'assets' to mean weapons of destruction.
EXPANSION: Usual Singleton idiosyncrasy.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 88)
Comment number 89.
At 14:34 20th Mar 2011, kevseywevsey wrote:I see we have ourselves another warmongerer Primeminister.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 89)
Comment number 90.
At 15:59 20th Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:CUT AND PASTE PRIME MINISTERS (#89)
Indded yo do Kev. AND THE MACHINERY THAT 'MAKES' THEM STILL STANDS.
Who is next? Balls? Alexander? Miliband D?
We CAN stop this. Worth a try, just to prove it is not just Gaddafi who will kill his own . . .
Complain about this comment (Comment number 90)
Comment number 91.
At 17:44 20th Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:You Won't Post This .. Whoever YOU Are
The Young Man who Died of His Wounds on Friday, Pte Daniel Prior
Was The Nephew of Cpl Stevie Prior, A Great Pal of ours Who Died of His Wounds at The Battle of DarWin Hill and Goose Green, Falkland Islands 1982
Men such as these, Give You A Day of Rest .. Enjoy Your Day of Rest
Complain about this comment (Comment number 91)
Comment number 92.
At 23:10 20th Mar 2011, brossen99 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1IK-Q9quqk
Complain about this comment (Comment number 92)
Comment number 93.
At 23:31 20th Mar 2011, ecolizzy wrote:Comic Relief - raised around a pound a head of our population.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 93)
Comment number 94.
At 07:40 21st Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:92 I dont buy that You Tube Peace. 93 76 Million? in this Tiny Place No Wonder we're in Trouble
I do hope some of The Record Amount raised goes to Japan
Complain about this comment (Comment number 94)
Comment number 95.
At 08:09 21st Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:Enjoyed my day of Rest yesterday Auntie
did part of The Fleet Half Marathon .. on my Motoring Bike
Excellent Country File, do Ewe have A twin auntie I do, The Welsh Farmer with his Pregnant Ewe's and the tender care, now that is a good farmer, This country is begging to go for Hydro Power.
Watched Top Gear repeat Watched Top Gear repeat
My Fathers middle Name is Clark I am A Clarkson
My Mothers middle Name is May I am A Mason
Bought my Girls 2 Hamsters wrong Guinea Pigs I Love Pigs I Love Hamsters
Do I like Top Gear No I Love Top Gear
The Wonders of The Universe, I could have told you there is No Darkside of The Moon, went up there last week with Wallace and Gromit for some more Cheese, No Complaints about The Music it adds to the mood
Am I turning into a Sad old Spud Coach .. I Dont Think So
Complain about this comment (Comment number 95)
Comment number 96.
At 08:20 21st Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:D. N. A.
Only Incestious Paedo's would have Cause 2 Flap over The Old Bill's Collecting of Fingerprints & D.N.A.
Over the Years British Bobbies have collected loads of my stuff
They could Never in A Billion Years Fit Me Up for A Paedo Charge.
I was Very Pleased about the Smashing of A Paedo Ring, however what will they get, They Deserve More Than A Slap on the Wrist.
Same for Idiots who Tea Leaf from Farmers
Complain about this comment (Comment number 96)
Comment number 97.
At 08:38 21st Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:AH .. Lest I Forget .. The Old Firms Game
Did I See an Plonker in Blue trip over A Blade of Grass
Disgrace look yourself in the face
Complain about this comment (Comment number 97)