| You are in: UK: Politics | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Wednesday, 11 December, 2002, 12:55 GMT Politics takes another blow ![]() Mrs Blair's role may have changed forever
I just can't imagine it had them as gripped as the pages and pages of coverage seemed to suggest.
The government's huge U-turn over road building plans, executed with relative ease on Tuesday, perhaps? But in a small corner of London, little else has been talked about over the last few days. One observer called it "institutional hysteria" in the Westminster village. It's hard to find a better description. Important That said, "frenzy" - the word which Downing Street had clearly told ministers to use as they tried to head off the row - is pretty good too. Not that there wasn't a story in the Cherie Blair affair. Yes, important questions arose - namely why the prime minister's wife misled her husband's spokesman. Other important questions remain, and it's right that they are asked. But it's not Watergate, is it? Judging by the reaction to the story, you'd think the government was teetering on the brink. There is a state of "near panic" in Whitehall, apparently. It's hogwash. Worse still, it does no favours to those outside Westminster simply wanting an objective appraisal of the political climate. Sophisticated Labour itself is partly to blame. There is still deep mistrust - and in some cases loathing - of the media within the party, going back to the way Neil Kinnock was portrayed during the 1992 general election. As a result, the party has developed a highly sophisticated media machine in an attempt to stop the same thing ever happening again. Sometimes - and the Jo Moore saga over "burying bad news" highlighted the mentality - they go way over the top. Some within Labour have turned being petty and unnecessarily obstructive towards journalists simply trying to do their job, into a fine art. And resentment over spin and the way the media is sometimes manipulated has boiled over for some journalists. Make no mistake, private battles play a part to some degree. There are political journalists who barely disguise their distaste for Tony Blair's communications chief, Alastair Campbell. Wrong No doubt the feeling is mutual in some cases. That's fair enough. But such feelings shouldn't creep into reporting of parliament and government. Cherie Blair was wrong to get mixed up with Peter Foster. She was wrong to mislead Downing Street's press office. Other questions remain - but none suggest some great misdeed of mind-blowing proportions. So who suffers from it all? Cherie Blair will regret that getting mixed up with Peter Foster forced her to make an unprecedented public statement. That may have changed forever her role as the prime minister's wife. The government has clearly been damaged too. Relations between the media and the government have reached an all time low. The image of politics and public life has again been tarnished. And if it did raise questions up and down the country, I can't help thinking that one will have been: "So what was all that about, then?" What do you think? |
Internet links: The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ||
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> | To BBC World Service>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |