The Act requires the chief constable to submit a report on any policing matter to the policing board at its request.
However, the chief constable can refer a request for a report to the secretary of state if it concerns a matter of national security, of sensitive personal nature, ongoing court cases or investigations or matters "which would prejudice the detection of crime of the administration of justice".
Following the submission of a report, the policing board will have the power to order an inquiry if it considers the matter to be grave or there are what it considers to be "exceptional circumstances".
Twelve of the 19 board members must support the establishment of an inquiry.
However, a crucial departure from the Patten report is that the secretary of state will have the power to prevent or halt an inquiry if he or she concludes that it would not be in the interests of "the efficiency or effectiveness of the police service".
Critics of this element say that it completely undermines the Patten report's aim of creating a police board firmly embedded in the community whch can hold the police to account and play a key role in its functions and working relationship with other agencies.
The Act goes on to say that the board cannot conduct inquiries into events prior to its establishment.
The Act provides for a new policing ombudsman to report on matters of concern to the policing board and chief constable.
Back to top
The secretary of state will set broad strategic objectives for the police service after consultation with the policing board and chief constable.
Once these are outlined, the board will set more detailed objectives.
Every year the chief constable will be expected to draft a policing plan. This will be submitted to the board which will be able to amend it, subject to consultation with the chief constable and the secretary of state.
Back to top