| You are in: Talking Point | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Friday, 19 July, 2002, 16:19 GMT 17:19 UK IRA apology: Is it acceptable? ![]() The IRA has apologised to the families of "non-combatants" for killings it has carried out over the last 30 years. In an unprecedented statement issued on Tuesday to mark the 30th anniversary of Bloody Friday, the IRA offered its "sincere apologies and condolences" to the families of civilian victims of its violence. "It is appropriate on the anniversary of this tragic event that we address all of the deaths and injuries of non-combatants caused by us", the statement said. What is your reaction to the IRA statement? Do you think the apology is acceptable? This Talking Point is now closed. Read a selection of your comments below. Your comments: As one who has lost a family member, who was murdered by the IRA for the simple reason of being a Protestant, no words from a prepared statement from a hidden spokesperson for a Terrorist organisation will compensate me or my family for our loss. We all will carry it to our graves. If they were the least bit sincere, the person or persons who carried out this deed would stand up and ask for forgiveness from the people to whom they ensured would be scarred for life. The one saving grace is the knowledge that they will one day be made accountable for their actions to a far higher authority.
Peter, Belfast, Northern Ireland The people who have commented on the lack of apologies by the loyalists seem to have forgotten that at the start of the ceasefire period the CLMC issued a statement outlining their "true and abject remorse" to the relatives of their victims for the suffering caused by them. The IRA apology is a cynical stunt to get them off the hook over Colombia and recent shootings of 5 Protestant Civilians is east Belfast Perhaps with this genuine step taken by the IRA the Loyalist Paramilitary groups will step up to the plate and apologize for the random killing of innocent Catholics. Have we forgotten about Quinn boys and so many others that have been killed because of the area that they live in or because they are working in an area that they don't live in. It's not only the IRA that needs to issue apologies. Good on them though to get the ball rolling. A step in the right direction.
Susan, USA/UK Whether the apology is acceptable is up to each surviving victim and all the families and friends of victims. I do think it's an important step for NI as a whole since we have all been affected in a general way by the political consequences of the campaign. The real test of the IRA is, if it doesn't intend to return to violence, why does it still exist? I think that the IRA statement is "acceptable" because it is a step forward by the IRA to publicly state some change in their mindset away from violence toward resolving problems through political structures. This is acceptable only if the IRA has indeed quit its violent operations. This statement needs to be followed by the IRA putting more weapons "beyond use" and a further demilitarization in Northern Ireland, then it would become unquestionably "acceptable".
Brian, UK (NI) This is a start, but only a start. Sorry is what sorry does. Republican terrorism must control the dissidents and stop its own on going threatening activities if this apology is to mean any thing. Northern Ireland has to move on and accepting guilt is one more step in the process. It doesn't matter if they apologise or not. What needs to be done now is for the Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland to realize that they aren't all that different, that it doesn't really matter if they are part of Britain or Ireland and that it is ridiculous to hate your neighbour because of some minor difference in the way mass/service is celebrated and a few prayers to Mary and for the dead. Ridiculous, childish and utterly stupid in today's modern world. Who cares about the IRA? It's what the people of Northern Ireland are doing to themselves everyday that's the problem. Both sides need to grow up and act like people and not animals
Alan Bates, Springfield, Oregon, USA (ex-England) I applaud the IRA for adopting a forward-looking stance. Blair should show some generosity here. It's a great shift towards reconciliation. While it in no way justifies what the IRA has done in the past, it shows the world that some terrorists actually do have a conscience. It's too bad groups like al-Qaeda don't have the heart to do something like this. The UK is a different place from 30 years ago. Just look at the decline of the monarchy and imperialistic policies. If the cycle of hate can stop now, then a united Ireland will happen all by itself by 2020. The apology should be accepted. The only way towards peace is forgiveness.
Morgan, N. Ireland Is the IRA apologising because certain groups in the US have had their funding seized or stopped following 11 September? Are they showing remorse or have they lost their main funding? Having grown up in Northern Ireland during the Troubles, I think this single gesture has shocked me more than anything else that has happened. It seems like a straightforward apology and I can see no 'angle' on it. I pray that it is meant and I pray that the spectre of the paramilitaries which still loom large in the background will now sink into oblivion. It is completely disingenuous, and political in nature. It is an obvious "spin" and only done to placate the North American audience who will no longer tolerate murderers who hide behind the name of "freedom fighters". They are not a legitimate military but the same as other terrorists who have no moral standing in the free world.
A, USA What kind of "combatants" were the IRA looking to kill by bombing Harrods? Some soldiers who were shopping, perhaps? The apology is a sham. The apology has to be enough. There's certainly no way to change history. What I find curious, if not highly hypocritical, is the fact that there has yet to be an apology issued by the British Government for its crimes. An apology from a paramilitary group is so readily scrutinised, yet no one questions why a supposed responsible government isn't equally liable to offer the same in the quest for reconciliation. M�ire of USA asks when the British Government will make an apology. When will the Americans apologise for their support of the IRA terrorists? The IRA are not terrorists! Their apology should be welcomed and accepted. It's enlightening that most of those respondents who agree the apology is acceptable come from outside the British Isles. They obviously haven't lived with the spectre of the IRA for the whole of their lives. Chris from Switzerland - you are so naive to be breathtaking. If they aren't terrorists what on earth are they? Kindly old uncles who bring semtex instead of sweets?!
And to answer M�ire from the US, the British forces were ordered into Northern Ireland by the government to protect the Catholics in the late 60s. I take the apology with a large pinch of salt and treat it with the contempt that it deserves. If they back up their apology with handing over arms, then it will have some meaning. But I don't suppose their feelings of remorse go that far. Maybe I'm too cynical but I can't forget the mother of that baby as she was helped by two people to the plane to take her husband and baby girl home in coffins. I look at the blighted landscape of Belfast and have to wonder just what was so valuable that it was worth killing for. The apology is certainly a step in the right direction. Could you imagine Hamas apologising for suicide bombings in restaurants and school buses? Or al-Qaeda for crashing civilian airliners into skyscrapers? If events of the last year have shown anything, it's that the troubles in Ulster appear quite gentlemanly by comparison. So just shake hands, forgive and forget, and go home. The IRA's apology marks a hopeful beginning. I am not holding my breath, however, waiting for the Loyalist paramilitaries to issue their apologies, nor for British governments past and present to issue theirs. Maybe I'm wrong. Let's hope so!
Paul, New Jersey The rebuilding of communities and the building of long-term peace can only really start when people are ready to say sorry. I believe that the IRA statement is sincere and it shows that, despite a lack of official statement, the IRA's war is over. Unfortunately, no action or statements by the IRA in pledging itself to the peace process is ever welcomed warmly by Unionists as they always feel it is just a publicity stunt by the IRA. It is a welcome statement, and one that few would have expected only a few years ago. A reminder of how absolute values can become less absolute in the face of peace and compromise.
Tim, Ireland We have seen previous statements before and look what happened in the aftermath of such verbose rhetoric. If the IRA is truly sincere in its apology then the decommissioning process has to move forward apace. Apologies are well and good but many will never forget or forgive, and for good reason. Hindsight is always 20:20. To apologise after detonating bombs and killing people is just an insult to people's intelligence. Bombs are designed to kill - you don't go around planting them if you intend to apologise for it later on. An apology, from anyone, is an admission of wrongdoing and a show of remorse, and so should be accepted by all those affected by the tragedy of terrorism. It does not excuse past wrong doings, nor does it pretend to, but I hope this can be seen as a step toward some form of resolution.
J Andrews, England I'm glad to see the IRA take the honourable step and accept its responsibility in the slaughter of the innocent during the Troubles. This apology to its victims can only be seen as a breath of fresh air into the normally entrenched social and political climate of Northern Ireland. I hope that the main loyalist groups follow suit and apologise to the many victims of their equally brutal campaigns of violence. Expressing remorse is one thing. Feeling remorse is entirely different. My feeling is that if the sentiments expressed by the IRA had any substance, their ingrained habit of killing people would have stopped 29 years ago.
Paul Sims, UK The IRA meant to kill almost every one of the thousands it has killed, military and civilian alike. It still retains the capacity to do so again, as soon as the present flood of appeasing steps shows any sign of drying up, which is why it is still arming itself with newer and more deadly weaponry. To call this apology cynical is to give cynicism a bad name. While obviously they did intend to harm civilians at the time - an apology is a step towards recognising the terrible damage that has been done. When can we expect the other paramilitary organisations and the UK government to do the same for their civilian killings? The question isn't if 'sorry' is acceptable, it's if 'sorry' is enough. I don't think it is, or will ever be when it comes from an organisation with so much blood on its hands. Would we welcome such an apology from al-Qaeda?
Kelly, England I welcome this apology. No doubt Paisley and his ilk will find fault with it, but the undeniable truth is that it is a step in the right direction. Let peace reign! The Bible advises us not to despise the day of small beginnings. Let us rejoice at one small step for the IRA, one giant leap in the peace process.
John G, London, UK 'Sorry' has to be suffixed by either 'I didn't mean to' or 'I was wrong'. Can the IRA honestly say they feel either? If it's sincere, then it's surely most welcome. Admitting that such actions were wrong is the first step to repentance. No doubt we'll get a row when people start disbelieving the statement.
Wendy, UK This is a humble and sincere apology. It doesn't change the great loss of life causes by many groups in Ireland over the last 30 years, including the British Army. It does, however, point to importance of communication in bringing peace to Ireland. This is a rare and unexpected gesture and it should be acknowledged. The IRA claim that "it was not our intention to injure or kill non-combatants". This simply doesn't square with leaving no-warning bombs all over a busy shopping centre. The IRA are international terrorists, their business is killing civilians. They are still involved in murder, daily.
Patrick, Netherlands I remember, as a child, seeing the grim images of Bloody Friday. It must be positive, though, that the IRA has got to a point where reflection and apology are even possibilities. Language and words matter. Hopefully this is another constructive step, by one of the parties in the conflict, towards being able to live with each other. The IRA's apology means nothing unless the organisation means never to commit such atrocities again. Who can believe that while they retain their arms? When they give up the arms, then perhaps the apology will have some meaning and acceptability.
James, UK An unequivocal apology is always acceptable. But one of the prerequisites for earning absolution in the Catholic Church is restitution - trying to make up for the bad effects of sin. I do hope that the IRA backs up its good words with positive, conciliatory actions and that the people it has offended will accept that a psychologically significant step has been taken. I was born in NI and I lived there until I was 20. I think it is a significant move, even though it will not bring the victims back. I only wish that here in the Middle East we would hear the same from Islamic Jihad, Hamas, Al Aqsa martyrs brigade and all the rest of them. Then perhaps there would be some light at the end of a very long tunnel. I'm not a republican sympathiser, but I can't see this apology being accepted by many on the Unionist side. It is a welcome statement but it will never take away the hurt and grief of those maimed and murdered. The IRA will never bomb Northern Ireland into a united Ireland. A united Ireland will only come about by the majority of people in NI voting to enter a reunification process of some kind. It appears that the IRA is trying to avoid being classified as terrorists. War over religion is terrorism, period. |
See also: 16 Jul 02 | N Ireland Top Talking Point stories now: Links to more Talking Point stories are at the foot of the page. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more Talking Point stories |
![]() | ||
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> | To BBC World Service>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |