| You are in: UK: Politics | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tuesday, 6 August, 2002, 08:18 GMT 09:18 UK The battle against a mobile mast ![]() It was not the local council - or a representative from the mobile phone company - but a neighbour who had stumbled across the planning application by chance.
"It was on a piece of A4 paper, tied to a lamp-post," Julie, a 42-year-old auxiliary nurse from Gatley, recalls. "Luckily someone noticed it, because it would have been very easy to miss. "Someone knocked on my door and basically a few of us got together and said, right what can we do about it?" Eighteen months this group of friends and fellow campaigners had wrung an agreement out of mobile phone giant One2One not to build a mast near their homes.
"We were not just opposing masts for the sake of it. We are not anti-mobile phone. "The bottom line is that nobody really knows if masts are safe - and if they ever do find out it will be far too late. "I have a young daughter and I just wasn't happy with that." Early setbacks The campaigners - around 12 activists in total - organised themselves into an action group and began lobbying Stockport Council. They also got the local media involved and made sure everybody in Gatley knew what was going on - and where to write to complain about it. But their efforts failed to prevent Stockport Council throwing out a request to revoke planning permission for the mast. The ruling Liberal Democrat group said they were sympathetic to the campaigners' concerns, but advice from lawyers and council officers was that the government, which ultimately sanctions planning decisions, would have thrown the request out. The leader of the Lib Dem group said it would be a "reckless waste" of taxpayers' money to revoke the consents. Angry At this point many people would have given up. But the Gatley campaigners had the bit between their teeth. "I was genuinely angry and so was Lisa (Oldham, a friend and fellow campaigner). We couldn't believe what had happened.
"We were so angry and so determined." By this time the stress of the campaign had started to tell - Julie was having nightmares that the mast had already been erected. The group was also discovering the power of the vested interests they were taking on. Conflict of interest "Ordinary people are just not listened to. That's the problem. "The government take the money off the mobile phone companies so their hands are tied. There is a terrible conflict of interest there. "The local council just says there is nothing they can do about it.
"But I doubt MPs or local councillors would allow a 45 mast to be put up a few yards from their back gardens." The mountain of documents associated with the case was also taking up an increasing amount of time. "I am an educated person. I have a degree. But the complexity of the language used in the planning documents seems deliberately designed to put ordinary people off," Julie said. High court action The Gatley group decided to seek a judicial review of the council's decision in the High Court, in Julie's name. "I lived closest to where the mast was going to be erected and I have a daughter. "But the main reason the action was taken in my name was that I could get legal aid. We could not really go ahead without that." Backed by the national Campaign for Planning Sanity, a high court action was launched against Stockport Council, in an effort to reverse their decision on the mast. But they were to be denied their day in court. One2One, perhaps nervous of legal precedents being established, offered an out-of-court agreement not to erect a mast or allow other mobile companies to take over the site. Fantastic feeling This was enough to satisfy the legal aid board and the High Court action had to dropped. The campaigners had won their own, small battle. But hopes that the Gatley case would be a landmark ruling that would pave the way for other campaigners around the country were dashed. "To get the judicial review was a fantastic feeling. We were jubilant.
"So in that respect, we felt a bit deflated. We haven't changed anything, really. " Nevertheless, Julie has no regrets about taking on the authorities. "It is amazing how many people just sit back and think they can't do anything. "You can make a difference. You can stop people getting away with things." But, she stresses, "it wouldn't have worked if we hadn't pulled together as a group. I couldn't have done it on my own". Disclaimer: The BBC will put up as many of your comments as possible but we cannot guarantee that all e-mails will be published. The BBC reserves the right to edit comments that are published. |
See also: 07 May 02 | UK 04 Mar 02 | Education 03 Apr 01 | Politics 11 Apr 02 | N Ireland Internet links: The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ||
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> | To BBC World Service>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |