 | | 06 November 2002 - Published at 17h31 GMT | | NATO breaking in new troops |  Nato Secretary General Lord Robertson; the alliance is preparing to take in new members
|
Three years ago, America's President Bill Clinton welcomed the accession of the three Central European states to NATO as the righting of an historical injustice:
"Today we are joined by the leaders of Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic, whose descent into darkness helped to spark NATO's creation. So we say, welcome to NATO, welcome home to the community of freedom"
 Today we are joined by the leaders of Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic, whose descent into darkness helped to spark NATO's creation.
 | | Bill Clinton | Arguments in favour of NATO enlargement had been weighed against vigorous protests from Russia. The new entrants pledged they would not be burden - but would fulfil all the obligations of membership.
Much to do
Restoring pre-war regimental traditions and sending a few younger officers on English-language courses are not enough to create a Western army. Jonathan Eyal of the Royal United Services Institute in London explains.
"The Polish army continued to be a repository of national identity in an almost unique way in Central Europe. But the Czech military remained an utter joke," he says.
"Because of Hungary's very rapid economic strides, the Hungarian military found itself unable to recruit anyone of quality... and ended up in a terrible downward spiral".
At best, he thinks, NATO could make use of 20,000 troops from the three countries combines - 3 to 5 per cent of their total force.
Resentments
 The inability to take decisions or to take responsibility is a feature of the former Communist military and is duplicated throughout civilian life. | | Jonathan Eyal, defence analyst | Restructuring has meant the departure of large numbers of military personnel. Many of them couldn't adapt to NATO thinking, which emphasises flexibility and initiative. Major Bogdan Jurczyk used to fly Soviet-built planes in the Polish airforce:
"A pilot does what he is told. Pilots are pilots and politics are politics. For the proverbial "bottle of vodka" we could have got our hands on entire aircraft. But because we treated our old friends like dirt, they vandalised the airfields and took away their planes. I'll never live it down".
Eager but inexperienced
Jonathan Eyal says younger officers from Central Europe are often less jaded than their Western counterparts, but they lack experience:
"Knowledge of coalition warfare is often very poor. Ability to execute military manoeuvres is rather limited. The level of education, formally very high, is in practice rather inferior," he says.
"The inability to take decisions or to take responsibility is a feature of the former Communist military and is duplicated throughout civilian life."
Nevertheless, Poles, Czechs and Hungarians have given crucial help to NATO's operations in the Balkans - not just in providing military units and medical facilities for peacekeeping operations
In Hungary's case, it's also given access to intelligence sources in Yugoslavia.
Nato's unanswered questions
On matters of immediate concern to the United States, like last year's terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, the Americans have preferred to act alone. NATO has been sidelined.
 We want to be a member of the European Security architecture - and not just a child under it | | Janos Szabo, military expert | This makes it difficult for new members to know precisely what to plan for. David Betz of the Department of War Studies at King's College, London:
"What is NATO supposed to do? If you could answer that, then perhaps, as a Czech military planner, you could plug yourself into the bigger picture."
Jonathan Eyal suggests just being in NATO is important enough:
"The military of Central Europe are in the game not because they know what they want, but because they want to be sure they are involved in whatever ultimately emerges."
Or as Janos Szabo, head of Hungary's Strategy and Defence Studies Institute puts it:
"We want to be a member of the European security architecture - and not just a child under it". |  |
|  | |