ScotlandWalesNorthern Ireland
BBC Homepagefeedback | low graphics version
BBCiCATEGORIES  TV  RADIO  COMMUNICATE  WHERE I LIVE  INDEX   SEARCH 

BBC SPORT
You are in: You are in: In Depth: Corruption in Cricket  
Front Page 
Football 
Cricket 
Rugby Union 
Rugby League 
Tennis 
Golf 
Motorsport 
Boxing 
Athletics 
Other Sports 
Sports Talk 
In Depth 
Photo Galleries 
Audio/Video 
TV & Radio 
BBC Pundits 
Question of Sport 
Funny Old Game 

Around The Uk

BBC News

BBC Weather

SERVICES 
Monday, 18 June, 2001, 14:42 GMT 15:42 UK
The waiting goes on
Malcolm Gray and Sir Paul Condon
The acceptance of the report did little to appease fans
BBC Sport Online assesses the impact of the International Cricket Council decision to back Sir Paul Condon's anti-corruption proposals.

Any cricket fans expecting some flesh to be added to the bones of Sir Paul Condon's report into match-fixing must be disappointed.

The importance of putting measures in place to reform the ICC and protect cricketers from falling into the the clutches of bookmakers and betting rings cannot be denied.

But the minutiae of the Condon report is of little interest to the average cricket fan.

What they want to know is who was involved in match-fixing, where, when and how much money changed hands.

They want suspected offenders laid bare, in black and white.

But doing so is fraught with legal implications.

Sir Paul says there has been a "false expectation to have a compendium of names" of those who allegedly involved in cricket corruption.

Hansie Cronje
Cronje is one of the few players censured
There were ongoing inquiries into players not named in the Indian Central Bureau of Investigation published last year.

And some of those players are still involved in international cricket.

He is, however, not at liberty to name names.

Standing behind the shield of defamation and the threat of hindering any possible legal action down the line may be the responsible course to take but it did nothing to stop the cloud hanging over players.

Sir Paul confirmed that he was still concerned that the outcome of matches had been fixed in the last year since his unit was set up.

But again, he refused to name the matches under investigation for fear of jeopardising inquiries.

Sir Paul and the ICC both want to concentrate on the future and ensure outside forces cannot influence the outcome of cricket matches.

But without a resolution to the current inquiries, one eye will always be looking to the past.

Mohammad Azharuddin
Azharuddin was banned for his alleged part
An ultimatum to bookmaker MK Gupta to present his claims to the anti-corruption unit by 1 July appears a desperate attempt to garner information so some action can be taken against players.

Individual cricket authorities in India, Pakistan and South Africa have staged investigations and punished those it has found guilty of wrong doings.

Pakistan are now into their second probe into suggestions that matches were fixed in the 1999 World Cup.

Hansie Cronje was banned for life, Salim Malik likewise and India's Mohammad Azharuddhin had the same punishment while others were also censured.

Various other inquiries in New Zealand, Sri Lanka and West Indies have yet to announce their findings.

"There is still much to do, but the implementation of the ACU Report begins from today and we will be judged by the progress we make on it over the next 12 months," ICC president Malcolm Gray said.

The ICC appears powerless, however, to actually do anything other than back a report that gives recommendations on the way forward, but fails to put a seal on the match-fixing saga.

Until that is done, and the guilty parties punished and the innocent cleared, can cricket ever recover the faith of its fans?

Internet links:


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Links to more Corruption in Cricket stories are at the foot of the page.

 

E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Corruption in Cricket stories

News image
News image
^^ Back to top