England qualified for the World Cup quarter-finals with a 1-0 win over Ecuador, but their performance again left some nagging questions. Can they prosper by playing the 4-5-1 formation that was deployed by Sven-Goran Eriksson in Stuttgart?
Does the lone striker's role suit the myriad talents of Wayne Rooney and is Michael Carrick the right man for the holding position in midfield?
BBC pundits Graham Taylor, Alan Hansen and Alan Shearer give their verdicts.
It's very difficult to know what to say after that match.
Yes, England are through to the quarter-finals of the World Cup. But you could argue this has been the most disappointing display of their four games so far.
Did Michael Carrick really come in and do the job we expected him to? I think the answer is no.
Wayne Rooney on his own up front - did that look like it would work? Again, no.
And I looked at the 4-5-1 system and wondered if the players really knew what was expected of them.
When you change a system it has to be fully explained. I'm not saying Sven-Goran Eriksson hasn't done that, but I'm not certain you have enough time in a tournament like this for that understanding to come through to all the players.
It's not been a good game from England's point of view, but we've had a free kick and David Beckham's converted it.
There's not a lot more you can say than that.
Except for the result, the one big positive is that Rooney had 90 minutes of competitive football and that can't do him anything but good.
But my view is that he needs somebody closer to him in attack because the lone striker's role doesn't bring the best out of him.
My man of the match was Michael Carrick, who gave a cracking display of the holding midfielder's role.
 Carrick: Should have cemented his place in the side |
I don't know why he hasn't played before at this World Cup. I saw him play in the pre-tournament friendly against Uruguay and he was terrific. Whatever the reason for his omission from the side after that, I think he's in for keeps now.
The energy levels of Wayne Rooney also amazed me in this game - he seemed to get stronger as the game went on.
But there were some slightly less impressive performances from a couple of other players in the England side.
John Terry has made as many mistakes in the last couple of games as he has for the last year-and-a-half.
And although Beckham's goal was absolutely brilliant, he didn't give England a lot else.
Can you have someone in the team purely because of their set pieces? I don't think so.
Wayne Rooney and Ashley Cole ran Michael Carrick very close as my man of the match.
Wayne never stopped running and setting chances up - I thought he was brilliant.
The lone striker's role was something slightly different for him. He had to get hold of the ball and wait to bring people in, which is not what he usually does for Manchester United or England.
But he did it great and his energy and involvement seemed to increase as the game went on.
Ashley Cole was sharp throughout and his block to thwart Carlos Tenorio in the first half was as good as Beckham's goal.
He made up 15 or 20 yards to get in the last-ditch tackle and deflect the ball onto the crossbar - it was absolutely fantastic.