By Jonathan Agnew BBC cricket correspondent

There are bound to be questions about the value of Vaughan's central contract Jonathan Agnew

Michael Vaughan will be disappointed to miss out on England's Test squad for their tour to the West Indies as, realistically, it moves him one step closer to retirement.

The fact is, however, that he simply has not had any opportunity to press for selection since the end of last summer.

It is acceptable to take a punt on a promising youngster on a tour - as is the case with Adil Rashid - but not on a 34-year-old whose form, on last inspection, had deserted him.

There are bound to be questions about the value of Vaughan's central contract as well.

There is the feeling in some quarters that he would be a better option at number three against Australia than either Ian Bell or Owais Shah. But that depends on how he starts the new season with Yorkshire, as well as the performances of the other two, of course.

Rashid is a good choice. Young and very talented, he has been picked over Ravi Bopara, who remains something of an enigma, and principally as a batsman.

606: DEBATE Common sense has prevailed! Vaughan has not been able to buy a run for four years in any form or level of cricket chesterfieldtim

For me, the biggest debate centres on the selection of the one-day squad.

After England's hammering in India there surely was good reason to introduce fresh faces. But Bell remains, leaving the top order still looking inadequate.

Luke Wright had no opportunity at all, so I am not convinced that the return of Dimitri Mascarenhas will have any impact whatsoever.

But at least the selectors have looked at the reserve wicketkeeper. Tim Ambrose was a passenger in India where his style of batting made him a bewildering choice.

Steve Davies had a tremendous Pro 40 season for Worcestershire, hitting two centuries and three fifties in seven innings, and will certainly push Matt Prior, whose place in the one-day team is not guaranteed

E-mail this to a friend

Printable version