BBC HomeExplore the BBC
This page has been archived and is no longer updated. Find out more about page archiving.

24 September 2014

BBC Homepage

Local BBC Sites

Neighbouring Sites

Related BBC Sites


Contact Us

Places features

You are in: Somerset > Places > Places features > Should nuclear energy stay in Somerset?

Nuclear control room

Hinkley Point B makes power for 1m homes

Should nuclear energy stay in Somerset?

As the government has given the green light for Hinkley Point B to extend its life by three years and given the go-ahead for a potential Point C, is nuclear energy the way forward and should it stay in Somerset?

Early in 2008, the government gave the go-ahead for Hinkley Point B, the nuclear power station in Somerset, to be extended for an extra three years.

It also gave the green light for a new generation of nuclear power stations, of which Hinkley was believed to be a favoured site.

The construction of a Point C would cost around £3bn to build which would be funded by the private sector and could be up-and-running by 2018. It would generate around £30m to the local economy.

Nigel Cann, station director at Hinkley Point, said: "Hinkley has got the site, the people and the skills to be involved in building a new nuclear power plant.

"It is really good news for the people of Somerset."

However the Stop Hinkley campaign group said the new power station would be expensive and not safe.

It claims there are various health risks associated with the plant. A study commissioned by the campaign group found breast cancer mortality was 70% higher than the national average in Burnham, however Somerset Primary Care Trust said the figures were a 'statistical anomaly'.

Environmental choice?

Most environmentalists are against nuclear power stations. Greenpeace said if Britain built ten new reactors, nuclear power can only deliver a 4 per cent cut in carbon emissions some time after 2025. 

No nuclear

Stop Hinkley say it is unsafe

They also argue that most of the gas we use is for heating and hot water and for industrial purposes. Nuclear power cannot replace that energy. The answer to Brtain's energy needs are renewable, cleaner fossil fuels and energy efficiency, they argue.

Campaigners for nuclear claim it is a viable 'green' energy as it releases less harmful carbon dioxide emissions than other greener forms of electricity like wind power.

Environmentalists for Nuclear Energy said nuclear energy was "clean, safe, reliable and economically competitve" and that it emits no greenhouse gas and uranium resources are "inexhaustable".

last updated: 05/05/2008 at 18:12
created: 18/02/2008

Have Your Say

Do you think Hinkley should be extended? Read the different viewpoints by clicking on the links to the right of the page and then have you say here.

The BBC reserves the right to edit comments submitted.

Sam Beard and Olivia m
Let's go for it - although it is expensive it doesn't emit harmful greenhouse gases and safety has improved dramatically in the last 20 years since Chernobyl

luke vincent
this is good stuff

andrew
there should be no nuclear power stations at all.thay are being built to make massive amounts of cash whith no thought for the enviroment or our welfare at all.the sensible way to go would be to encourage micro generation introduce feed in tarriffs so we can look after ourselvse.

Bob Marley
Hinkley Should be extended because it woud help with the oil crisis and it will provide jobs.

You are in: Somerset > Places > Places features > Should nuclear energy stay in Somerset?



About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy