BBC HomeExplore the BBC
This page has been archived and is no longer updated. Find out more about page archiving.



BBC Homepage
BBC Radio
BBC Radio 4 - 92 to 94 FM and 198 Long WaveListen to Digital Radio, Digital TV and OnlineListen on Digital Radio, Digital TV and Online

PROGRAMME FINDER:
Programmes
Podcasts
Schedule
Presenters
PROGRAMME GENRES:
News
Drama
Comedy
Science
Religion|Ethics
History
Factual
Messageboards
Radio 4 Tickets
Radio 4 Help

Contact Us


science
INSIDE THE ETHICS COMMITTEE
MISSED A PROGRAMME?
Go to the Listen Again page
Inside the Ethics Committee
Wednesdays 11, 18 May & 1 June 2005 8.00-8.45pm
Saturdays 14, 21 & 28 May 10.15-11.00pm
Contact us
Send us your comments about this programme.
Wed 18 May (rpt. Sat 21 May)
Programme 2 - Your Comments

In the second programme, the panel discusses the ethics behind giving patients temporary organ transplants.

Baby A was born with a bowel disorder and needs a combined liver and bowel transplant to survive in the long term. Bowels are in short supply, but without a new liver Baby A will die within weeks. Should Baby A be given this temporary liver? This same organ could bring years of life to one of 15 suitable children on the UK transplant waiting list.

"I am a third year pharmacy student and in this instance, I believe that Baby A should not receive the bridging liver as the stats are overwhelmingly against the baby. Thus other prospective individuals should benefit from the organ.

It seems quite heartless, but sometimes, ethics needs to be assessed from a distance and from a disjointed perspective. Then you observe the ultimate objectives and assess at a logical level.

Emotions do have a tendency to cloud the issues, but I guess it's why we have ethical debates such as these, to test our understanding and ultimately our race's objectives."
Paul

"I found it hard to entirely agree that Baby A should be prioritised for a temporary transplant above another patient who would only need a single transplant.

This was not just because it would deny another a child that chance, but also because it could have left Baby A still recovering from that operation when both liver and bowel became available. So could have been too sick to receive or benefit from them."
Cathryn

"Given the premise that all life is equally precious and the fact that organs are scarce, I would only put the baby on a liver/bowel waiting list. Giving the baby only a liver, a temporary solution, is tantamount to sacrificing the life of another child who could benefit from that liver.

Furthermore, in 6 months time, the same decision will have to be made. How many livers would this child receive, each one equating to another's life? It's a luxury we cannot afford at this point in medical technology.

Again, only if both a liver and bowel became available would the operation be worth considering, along with all the other factors such as the child's welfare, parents' wishes etc."
Richard

"The lack of donations bothers me. Could we not have a voluntary donations scheme - you have to opt out instead of opt in - this would surely help the lack of donations."
Anonymous.

Programme 1 - Treating a Jehovah's Witness
Programme 2 - Temporary Transplants
Programme 3 - End of Life

More Information:

Uk Clinical Ethics Network
UK Transplant - transplant information
The British Liver Trust - research
Cruse Bereavement Care - helpline
BBC Health
BBC Religion & Ethics
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites
Send us your comments about this programme.
Listen Live
Audio Help

Current Programmes

Archived programmes



About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy