BBC NEWSAmericasAfricaEuropeMiddle EastSouth AsiaAsia PacificArabicSpanishRussianChineseWelsh
BBCiCATEGORIES  TV  RADIO  COMMUNICATE  WHERE I LIVE  INDEX   SEARCH 

BBC NEWS
 You are in:  UK: Wales
News image
Front Page 
World 
UK 
England 
Northern Ireland 
Scotland 
Wales 
UK Politics 
Business 
Sci/Tech 
Health 
Education 
Entertainment 
Talking Point 
In Depth 
AudioVideo 
News image


Commonwealth Games 2002

BBC Sport

BBC Weather

SERVICES 
Monday, 18 February, 2002, 20:38 GMT
Assembly recall urged over HQ row
Site of new Assembly building
The site is currently a fenced-off hole in the ground
Opposition parties in Wales are calling for the Welsh Assembly to be recalled in order to debate the legal dispute with architect Richard Rogers.

It comes as pressure mounts on Finance Minister Edwina Hart to consider her position, after her interpretation of an independent adjudicator's report was apparently contradicted in the full statement released to AMs.

Edwina Hart told AMs the adjudication was "embarrassing"

Ms Hart told AMs last week that Lord Rogers had in effect "got it wrong" over estimated costs of the new debating chamber in Cardiff Bay.

But Nick Bourne, leader of the Conservative Assembly group, stepped up the pressure on the minister, describing Ms Hart's statement as "deeply misleading" and a "total distortion".

An assembly spokesperson said Ms Hart's conclusion was factually correct.

The full judgement - released following pressure from within her own party as well as from the opposition - showed that while the architect did underestimate the costs, no substance was found to support Ms Hart's claim of negligence.

Despite the minister's insistence that she was vindicated, the opposition parties are now calling for the assembly to be reconvened during the half-term break to discuss the issue.

Ms Hart has admitted the matter is embarrassing, but insists the decision to sack him was right.

Richard Rogers
Lord Rogers complained over unpaid fees

The adjudicator's ruling shows that the assembly was criticised for suggesting that the architects had got their figures wrong.

The assembly administration had argued that the original estimates for the new chamber, made back in 1998, were too low and on this count the Richard Rogers Partnership was found guilty.

But this was not found to be in any way deliberate or negligent, and the architects did not mislead the assembly to win the contract.

Indeed, at various stages, increases in costs were brought to the assembly's attention and were accepted.

It has emerged that the adjudicator was concerned about the use of such a blunt accusation against the Richard Rogers Partnership.

He also criticised the way the assembly had compared the original estimates with the actual costs - which could only have been known much later.

He concluded that the architects did show reasonable skill, care and diligence.

Lord Rogers had accused Ms Hart of being unfair and inaccurate when speaking about his involvement in the proposed new debating chamber.

 WATCH/LISTEN
 ON THIS STORY
News image BBC Wales's Geraint Vincent
"There are still just fancy computer graphics, a big hole in the ground, and an endless row"
Welsh Assembly Chamber Row

Key stories

Viewpoints

News imageBBC WALES ANALYSIS

News imageAUDIO/VIDEO

News imageLINKS
Internet links:


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Links to more Wales stories are at the foot of the page.


E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Wales stories



News imageNews image