| You are in: UK-Only | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Saturday, 18 May, 2002, 10:03 GMT 11:03 UK Hoon rejects Afghan 'hype' claim ![]() Hoon said there is still a 'real risk' of British casualties Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon has denied claims that the involvement of British troops in Afghanistan has been "hyped up". On Saturday an ex-Labour defence minister became the latest person to claim the Royal Marines' success had been exaggerated, and that little had been achieved.
Mr Hoon insisted the operation had gone according to the plan outlined in the House of Commons. "I think it is very, very important to stress that this is not ... some sort of war by safari. This is specifically a reaction to particular information," he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. "The Australian forces knew they were engaging the enemy. They were attacked by elements of al-Qaeda and the Taleban. There was a prolonged fire-fight. "I have very good reasons for knowing these forces were in that particular position for a number of days for that particular purpose. "They were attacked. They then called in support for coalition forces." Casualty risk The defence secretary said he was "very proud" of the Royal Marines' performance. "Certainly there has been combat and certainly our forces have been engaged in assisting other coalition forces in that effort," he said. Mr Hoon has come under fire for warning of possible casualties when he announced that the Marines would be sent in to track down al-Qaeda and Taleban forces.
"When I warned the House of Commons of the risk of casualties arising from combat I was warning the country quite properly of the need to recognise the real risk to our forces and that remains absolutely the case," he said. 'Task unclear' Ex-Labour Defence Secretary Doug Henderson's "hype" accusation came as the Royal Marines' latest mission, alongside Australian special forces, appeared to fall short of the major assault on al-Qaeda described by commanders. "There certainly is a suspicion that because the task is unclear, because perhaps the motivation may have been more political than military, there is a need to hype up the success of the operation when probably not a lot has been achieved," he told Today. "If the purpose is to rid Afghanistan of al-Qaeda forces and forces sympathetic to al-Qaeda they won't do that in three months. "That could only be done virtually on a permanent basis until such a time as Afghan forces are able to police their own territory." |
See also: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII|News Sources|Privacy | ||