





| SERVICES |  |
|  | Thursday, 21 March, 2002, 09:28 GMT English devolution: Part two
Part two: Perceptions of regional assemblies It has been proposed that there should be an elected assembly for your region. Do you agree or disagree with the following comments: |
A regional assembly would give your region a stronger voice in Westminster and at Brussels: |  |
A regional assembly would improve the economic development of the region: |  |
Regional assemblies would simply result in more bureaucracy and red tape: |  |
Regional assemblies would bring government closer to the people: |  |
A regional assembly would just become a talking shop for politicians and be a waste of money: |  |
This question, which excludes those surveyed in London, raised a variety of issues. While almost three-quarters of those surveyed thought that an assembly would strengthen representation in Westminster and the European Union, there were a significant number of people who also thought that the bodies would either be simply a talking shop or result in more red tape. One of the most interesting results was that a majority thought that it would bring government closer to their region. Almost 60% of those surveyed also said that an assembly would lead to greater pride in an area. |
The BBC's English Regional Devolution Survey involved 2646 nationally representative telephone interviews in England, conducted between1 and 10 March 2002. For some questions, specific responses are given for the north-east, north-west and Yorkshire and Humber areas. |
|  | Top UK Politics stories now:  Links to more UK Politics stories are at the foot of the page.  |