The Audit Commission has released its ratings on council performances in England for 2007. Here is the full listing: In its Comprehensive Performance Assessment the commission gives an overall star rating to each specific council, one being the lowest, four being the highest.
To arrive at the overall rating, the commission looks at a council's use of resources (including value for money), work with children and young people, adult social care arrangements, cultural services, environmental services, payment and collection of benefits, housing services and corporate capacity to improve.
COUNCIL PERFORMANCE RATINGS
| Council | Type | Direction of travel | Star rating | Value for money |
| Barking & Dagenham + | LBC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Barnet + | LBC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Barnsley + | MDC | Subject to review | *** | 3 |
| Bath & N E Somerset | UA | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Bedfordshire + | CC | Improving strongly | *** | 2 |
| Bexley # | LBC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Birmingham + | MDC | Improving well | *** | 2 |
| Blackburn with Darwen | UA | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Blackpool + | UA | Improving strongly | *** | 3 |
| Bolton + | MDC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Bournemouth + | UA | Improving adequately | ** | 2 |
| Bracknell Forest | UA | Improving strongly | **** | 3 |
| Bradford | MDC | Improving adequately | *** | 2 |
| Brent + | LBC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Brighton & Hove + | UA | Improving well | *** | 2 |
| Bristol + | UA | Improving well | ** | 2 |
| Bromley + | LBC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Buckinghamshire + | CC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Bury | MDC | Improving adequately | ** | 3 |
| Calderdale + | MDC | Improving adequately | **** | 3 |
| Cambridgeshire # | CC | Improving adequately | *** | 3 |
| Camden | LBC | Improving strongly | **** | 4 |
| Cheshire # | CC | Improving well | **** | 2 |
| Cornwall | CC | Improving adequately | *** | 2 |
| Corporation of London + | LBC | Improving strongly | **** | 3 |
| Coventry + | MDC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Croydon | LBC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Cumbria + | CC | Improving adequately | ** | 2 |
| Darlington | UA | Improving well | **** | 4 |
| Derby | UA | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Derbyshire # | CC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Devon + | CC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Doncaster # | MDC | Subject to review | *** | 2 |
| Dorset + | CC | Improving adequately | *** | 3 |
| Dudley + | MDC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Durham | CC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Ealing + | LBC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| East Riding of Yorkshire | UA | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| East Sussex + | CC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Enfield + | LBC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Essex | CC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Gateshead # | MDC | Improving strongly | **** | 3 |
| Gloucestershire | CC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Greenwich + | LBC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Hackney + | LBC | Improving strongly | *** | 2 |
| Halton | UA | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Hammersmith & Fulham | LBC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Hampshire + | CC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Haringey + | LBC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Harrow + | LBC | Improving adequately | ** | 2 |
| Hartlepool # | UA | Subject to review | **** | 3 |
| Havering + | LBC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Herefordshire # | UA | Improving adequately | ** | 2 |
| Hertfordshire # | CC | Subject to review | *** | 3 |
| Hillingdon + | LBC | Improving well | ** | 3 |
| Hounslow + | LBC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Isle of Wight + | UA | Improving well | ** | 2 |
| Isles of Scilly # | UA | Improving adequately | | 2 |
| Islington + | LBC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Kensington & Chelsea + | LBC | Improving strongly | **** | 3 |
| Kent | CC | Improving strongly | **** | 4 |
| Kingston-upon-Hull + | UA | Improving well | ** | 2 |
| Kingston-upon-Thames + | LBC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Kirklees + | MDC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Knowsley | MDC | Improving well | Subject to review | 3 |
| Lambeth | LBC | Improving strongly | *** | 3 |
| Lancashire | CC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Leeds | MDC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Leicester | UA | Improving adequately | *** | 2 |
| Leicestershire | CC | Improving strongly | **** | 4 |
| Lewisham + | LBC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Lincolnshire + | CC | Improving well | ** | 2 |
| Liverpool | MDC | Improving adequately | * | 2 |
| Luton | UA | Improving adequately | *** | 2 |
| Manchester + | MDC | Improving adequately | *** | 2 |
| Medway + | UA | Improving adequately | *** | 3 |
| Merton + | LBC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Middlesbrough | UA | Subject to review | **** | 3 |
| Milton Keynes + | UA | Improving adequately | *** | 3 |
| Newcastle-upon-Tyne # | MDC | Improving well | *** | 2 |
| Newham + | LBC | Subject to review | *** | 3 |
| Norfolk | CC | Improving adequately | *** | 3 |
| North East Lincolnshire + | UA | Improving well | ** | 2 |
| North Lincolnshire | UA | Subject to review | **** | 3 |
| North Somerset + | UA | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| North Tyneside + | MDC | Improving strongly | *** | 2 |
| North Yorkshire + | CC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Northamptonshire + | CC | Improving adequately | ** | 2 |
| Northumberland | CC | Improving well | **** | 2 |
| Nottingham + | UA | Improving adequately | ** | 2 |
| Nottinghamshire | CC | Improving adequately | *** | 3 |
| Oldham | MDC | Improving adequately | ** | 2 |
| Oxfordshire | CC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Peterborough + | UA | Improving adequately | *** | 2 |
| Plymouth + | UA | Improving well | ** | 2 |
| Poole | UA | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Portsmouth | UA | Improving adequately | *** | 2 |
| Reading | UA | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Redbridge + | LBC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Redcar & Cleveland | UA | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Richmond-upon-Thames + | LBC | Improving well | *** | 4 |
| Rochdale + | MDC | Improving adequately | ** | 2 |
| Rotherham + | MDC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Rutland + | UA | Improving well | * | 3 |
| Salford + | MDC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Sandwell + | MDC | Improving strongly | ** | 2 |
| Sefton + | MDC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Sheffield + | MDC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Shropshire | CC | Improving strongly | **** | 4 |
| Slough + | UA | Improving adequately | ** | 3 |
| Solihull | MDC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Somerset + | CC | Improving strongly | **** | 3 |
| South Gloucestershire | UA | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| South Tyneside | MDC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Southampton + | UA | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Southend-on-sea | UA | Improving well | *** | 2 |
| Southwark | LBC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| St Helens | MDC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Staffordshire + | CC | Improving well | ** | 2 |
| Stockport + | MDC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Stockton-on-Tees | UA | Subject to review | **** | 4 |
| Stoke-on-Trent # | UA | Improving well | *** | 2 |
| Suffolk # | CC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Sunderland # | MDC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Surrey | CC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Sutton | LBC | Improving strongly | **** | 3 |
| Swindon + | UA | Improving strongly | ** | 2 |
| Tameside | MDC | Improving strongly | **** | 4 |
| Telford & Wrekin | UA | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Thurrock + | UA | Improving adequately | ** | 2 |
| Torbay + | UA | Improving well | ** | 2 |
| Tower Hamlets | LBC | Improving strongly | *** | 3 |
| Trafford + | MDC | Improving strongly | *** | 3 |
| Wakefield | MDC | Improving well | *** | 2 |
| Walsall | MDC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Waltham Forest | LBC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| Wandsworth | LBC | Improving strongly | **** | 4 |
| Warrington + | UA | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Warwickshire | CC | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| West Berkshire + | UA | Improving well | *** | 3 |
| West Sussex + | CC | Subject to review | **** | 3 |
| Westminster + | LBC | Improving strongly | **** | 4 |
| Wigan + | MDC | Improving well | **** | 3 |
| Wiltshire | CC | Improving adequately | *** | 3 |
| Windsor & Maidenhead # | UA | Improving adequately | *** | 3 |
| Wirral + | MDC | Subject to review | ** | 2 |
| Wokingham | UA | Improving adequately | *** | 3 |
| Wolverhampton + | MDC | Improving well | *** | 2 |
| Worcestershire | CC | Improving well | **** | 4 |
| York | UA | Improving well | *** | 3 |
|
Key
Council type: CC: County Council, LBC: London Borough Council, MBC: Metropolitan Borough Council, UA: Unitary Authority
+: Councils that have received a new-style corporate assessment and the score has been used to inform the overall CPA (Comprehensive Performance Assessment) star category.
#: Councils that have received a new-style corporate assessment and the score has been protected. In these cases the previous corporate assessment score has been used to inform the overall category.
Note : The Isles of Scilly are exempt from a star rating in 2007. The Audit Commission has agreed this with the Department for Communities and Local Government based on the applicability of the methodology to the islands' circumstances. An environment, culture or fire and rescue service assessment score for the Isles of Scilly in 2007 has not been published.
The star rating for Knowsley is subject to review at the time of publication [7 February 2008]
Bookmark with:
What are these?