| You are in: UK: England | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tuesday, 27 November, 2001, 00:51 GMT Green fears over new port ![]() The Dibden Bay area is said to be "wild and tranquil" By the BBC's environment correspondent Tim Hirsch A major environmental battle gets under way on Tuesday with the start of a public inquiry into plans for a big new container port near Southampton. The proposed development on a 202-hectare site at Dibden Bay is being seen as an important test of how much protection our wildlife has when pitted against the plans of big business. Associated British Ports (ABP) want to build the new terminal in the last stretch of Southampton Water to remain undeveloped. The tidal foreshore is not much to look at, but provides valuable feeding grounds for a range of wading birds. Opponents of the scheme, who include the government's wildlife advisers English Nature, say that it will threaten lapwings, Brent Geese, oystercatchers and curlew which have fewer and fewer places to feed as the coastline is developed. The site includes no fewer than eight sites of scientific interest, and is also among sites designated as being of international importance to wetland birds under the Ramsar Convention. Expanding international trade On the other side, ABP say it will create much-needed local employment. They also believe it will help Britain to cope with a big projected increase in the amount of container traffic expected to enter and leave the country as international trade expands in the next few years. They say they are building new habitats to compensate for the areas of foreshore which will be lost, but the environmental groups say this will in no way make up for the damage caused by the development. Local opinion is split, with some welcoming the extra employment opportunities, others dreading the extra traffic the terminal will generate on local roads at the edge of the New Forest.
All the arguments will be played out in great detail over a period of about a year in the public inquiry starting on Tuesday. It may well be the last of its kind, as the government will shortly launch new rules to speed up decision-making on big controversial projects like this. Tony Juniper of Friends of the Earth said: "If the government fast-track planning proposals are introduced, even the modest safety net we now have would be removed. "It would be a disaster for environmental protection and local democracy." |
See also: Internet links: The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top England stories now: Links to more England stories are at the foot of the page. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more England stories |
| ^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII|News Sources|Privacy | ||