![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Monday, June 14, 1999 Published at 11:02 GMT 12:02 UK Education Woodhead: 'I am paid to challenge mediocrity' ![]() Chris Woodhead says he will not shirk from identifying failure Chris Woodhead, the Chief Inspector of Schools in England, should adopt a less confrontational style, says a committee of MPs.
But Mr Woodhead rejected the criticism, saying "I am paid to challenge mediocrity, failure and complacency" whenever and wherever his inspectors come across it in schools.
The report recommends that in future the chief inspector should be "concerned to improve morale" and "promote confidence" among teachers. The committee's chairman, Malcolm Wicks, says that while Mr Woodhead's comments should be clear, they should not be "intemperate".
But Mr Woodhead said that if inspections found weaknesses it was Ofsted's duty to make this known. "There's no point at all in having a school inspection system if it gives praise where it isn't due."
Although backing Mr Woodhead's right to speak out on education issues, the report makes clear that any opinions should be substantiated with facts.
The report was welcomed by Nigel de Gruchy, General Secretary of the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers, who said the message to Mr Woodhead was "reform or resign. And when you make public statements make sure you do so on the basis of evidence and not just personal prejudice". However the allegations and counter-claims about Mr Woodhead's private life and his relationship with a former pupil are not addressed in the report. Other recommendations include the reduction of the period of notice of inspections to the "shortest period that is practical", with the possibility of unannounced inspections. The report also suggests that the Office for Standards in Education needs to have greater accountability and proposes a 'board of commissioners' to which Mr Woodhead would be answerable. While the report makes suggestions for improvements in the style and structure of Ofsted, it concludes that the schools watchdog is successfully carrying out its task in assessing standards in schools. The committee concludes that "no case can be made for radically changing the inspection system. Pupils and their parents can benefit from Ofsted's inspection of schools". But there is no immediate likelihood of ministers backing the report's calls for a new supervisory board. In her submission to the all-party committee's report, the School Standards Minister, Estelle Morris, expressed her satisfaction with the existing arrangements and gave little encouragement to calls for changes to Ofsted's structure. In an initial response to the report, the Education Secretary, David Blunkett, said that the report endorsed the achievements of the chief inspector and Ofsted in supporting the government's efforts to raise standards in schools. Chris Woodhead has also shown little enthusiasm for a supervisory body, arguing that he was already answerable to parliament through the Education Select Committee and the prime minister. | Education Contents
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||