![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Monday, March 22, 1999 Published at 16:15 GMT Education Blunkett targets urban comprehensives ![]() David Blunkett has promised to modernise the comprehensive system The Education Secretary, David Blunkett, says he wants to tackle a "culture of low expectation" in England's inner-city comprehensive schools. In a statement to the House of Commons, Mr Blunkett announced a �350m package of measures designed to "modernise the comprehensive principle", which he said would address the particular problems facing inner-city schools.
The use of "setting", in which pupils are divided into ability groups for some subjects, is also to be encouraged, said Mr Blunkett, in another attempt to stretch the more able pupils in the comprehensive system. The Excellence in Cities initiative announced by Mr Blunkett will target resources at 445 schools in London, Manchester, Birmingham, Liverpool, Leeds, Bradford, Sheffield and Rotherham, with the aim of ensuring that social deprivation will not stop educational achievement.
There will be extra assistance for disaffected pupils, with all the targeted inner-city schools having access to specialist units for disruptive youngsters. Mentoring, in which an adult offers individual pupils advice and guidance, will be used more extensively to encourage young people to stay in education: �17m will be provided to ensure that all secondary pupils who need a mentor will have one. Mr Blunkett told the House of Commons that the number of specialist schools, which provide centres of excellence in areas such as information technology, languages or the arts, would now be increased to 800 by the year 2002. There is also to be a five-fold expansion in 'beacon schools', which provide an example of excellence for neighbouring schools. There will now be 1,000 of them by 2002. Mr Blunkett also announced that there would be 40 more Education Action Zones, in which groups of schools are encouraged to work with business and the local community on innovative ways to raise standards.
There will be extra checks on the worst-performing schools, with the lowest 5% in performance tables being subjected to monitoring every six months. The problem of a high turnover of teaching staff is also to be tackled, with plans for "enhanced retention packages" to encourage teachers to stay in inner-city schools. University summer schools In another expansion of an existing policy, Mr Blunkett announced there would be pre-university summer schools, to prepare 16 and 17-year-olds to apply for places in higher education. This follows the setting up of summer schools for pupils between primary and secondary level. However the Shadow Education Secretary, David Willetts, was critical of what he claimed were the contradictions in the goverment's policy. While schools have been stopped from selecting by ability and "grammar schools are under threat ... they suddenly come up with this scheme for selecting more able pupils in inner-city comprehensives", said Mr Willetts. "Why is this form of selection by ability being imposed while all existing forms are being banned?"
"Nothing can hide the fact that the scheme is ill-conceived and totally misdirected. If its aim is to reassure middle-class parents and to halt the flight from the inner-city comprehensives, it is 30 years too late," he said. Grammar schools by the back door Mr de Gruchy also accused the government of seeking to re-introduce grammar schools. "Modernisation is a euphemism for the back-door re-introduction of grammar school selection," he said.
"We have supported specialist schools, provided they were open to all pupils, not simply pupils who happened to get a place in them," he said. There was a mixed response from the National Association of Head Teachers, who said the announcement "falls short of the really coherent strategy which is desperately needed". The Association of Teachers and Lecturers said the scheme should not be dismissed out of hand, but added: ""It is a shame that the prime minister fails to recognise the already considerable efforts that teachers make - many, for example, already work unpaid, outside school hours to hold subject surgeries for pupils." The Liberal Democrats welcomed the support for gifted pupils, but argued that the extra help should be extended to all such pupils and not only those in the inner-city. "It is wrong to assume that gifted pupils living in deprived rural areas or even in leafy suburbs need no extra help at school," said Liberal Democrat education spokesman, Phil Willis. | Education Contents
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||