BBC NEWSAmericasAfricaEuropeMiddle EastSouth AsiaAsia PacificArabicSpanishRussianChineseWelsh
BBCiCATEGORIES  TV  RADIO  COMMUNICATE  WHERE I LIVE  INDEX   SEARCH 

BBC NEWS
 You are in: Education
News image
Front Page 
World 
UK 
UK Politics 
Business 
Sci/Tech 
Health 
Education 
Hot Topics 
UK Systems 
League Tables 
Features 
Entertainment 
Talking Point 
In Depth 
AudioVideo 
News image


Commonwealth Games 2002

BBC Sport

BBC Weather

SERVICES 
Thursday, 7 December, 2000, 11:09 GMT
Row over better school test results
boy at desk
Tories say test results were rising faster pre-Labour
The government has ridiculed Conservative claims that standards in England's primary schools would have risen faster but for Labour "interference" in schools.

The school-by-school results, published on Thursday, show that 148 primaries managed to get the best possible score in the national curriculum tests for 11 year olds, up from 102 last year.

david blunkett
David Blunkett: "Strategies working"
The Education Secretary, David Blunkett, said the "excellent" results showed how well the government's literacy and numeracy strategies were working.

His Tory shadow, Theresa May, produced figures suggesting that the rate of improvement had slowed under Labour - but the government says that is a "ridiculous" assertion.

News imageClick here for this year's tables

"Standards in literacy and numeracy are rising, even though the Department for Education and Employment themselves admit that had Labour not meddled in our education system, standards would have risen even further," Mrs May said.

Trend plotted

Her argument is based on projecting forward the average improvement in English and maths results during the last couple of years of the last Conservative government.

In 1995, for example, 49% of 11 year olds reached the standard expected of their age in English.

Theresa May
Theresa May: "Labour meddling"
This year it was 75% - but Mrs May says it could have been 84%.

Similarly in maths, the improvement from 45% to 72% could have been to 88%.

"We welcome the fact that schools are being encouraged to share good practice, but David Blunkett's strategies to improve standards are too prescriptive," Mrs May said.

'Appalling legacy'

But her suggestion was dismissed by a senior government source who pointed out that the maths test had been toughened when Labour came in, to include mental arithmetic.

"Theresa May now seems to think that the answer to the appalling state of reading, writing and maths which we inherited would have been to leave schools to sink," he said.

"The fact is that when we were elected, fewer than 2% of primary schools were using what we now know to be the most effective teaching methods."

The most important change had been in raising achievement in the most challenging inner-city schools.

Successful action

David Blunkett said he was particularly pleased to see that the results for 11 year olds in the first 25 education action zones (EAZs) had improved even more than the national average.

mis-spelled story title
Writing standards trouble school inspectors
"This reflects the excellent work that is happening in EAZ schools to improve primary standards given the disadvantages that these schools face," he said.

"The performance tables, as two new Ofsted reports confirmed last week, show that we are on course to meet our targets for 2002 of 80% of 11 year old pupils reaching the expected standard for their age in English and 75% in maths.

"We are announcing today that we are allocating �192m in the next financial year to be spent on literacy and numeracy with a particular focus on writing, where we still have more to do."

Ofsted raised concerns, not for the first time, that standards in writing were lagging behind the general improvement in English.

  • The news release sent out by Conservative Central Office said numeracy and literacy standards would have been even higher had Labour not "medalled in our education system".

    An apology and correction followed within the hour - accusing the government of having "meddled".

    The table below shows the 150 local education authorities in England ranked on the basis of their primary schools' performance in the national curriculum tests.

    The columns show the percentage reaching the level expected of their age in English, maths and science, and the sum of those results.

    LEAENGMATSCIAgg.
    Richmond-upon-Thames83.9081.2092.00257.1
    Rutland83.3083.1089.80256.2
    Kensington and Chelsea83.8080.7091.00255.5
    Wokingham84.1081.0090.30255.4
    Isles of Scilly83.3083.3086.70253.3
    Surrey83.1078.4091.00252.5
    Barnet81.6078.6089.30249.5
    Trafford82.1078.2088.00248.3
    Solihull81.6077.3088.80247.8
    Bury79.6079.5088.50247.7
    North Yorkshire80.6078.1088.80247.5
    Cheshire79.8078.4088.70246.9
    Harrow81.6076.5088.60246.7
    City of London78.6075.0092.90246.4
    Sefton80.2077.0088.30245.4
    Hertfordshire80.3076.2088.80245.3
    Kingston-upon-Thames81.0076.9087.30245.1
    Shropshire78.9076.8088.70244.4
    Buckinghamshire80.4076.3087.10243.8
    Bromley80.2075.6087.90243.7
    Hampshire78.2075.4089.20242.9
    East Riding of Yorkshire79.3075.1088.40242.8
    Westminster78.3076.7087.80242.8
    Stockport79.3076.2087.20242.7
    Bracknell Forest78.4075.8088.20242.4
    South Gloucestershire78.4076.0088.00242.4
    Bath and NE Somerset76.5078.2086.80241.5
    North Somerset78.0075.6088.00241.5
    West Berkshire78.6075.6087.20241.5
    St Helens77.6076.4087.40241.4
    Dorset78.5073.0089.80241.2
    Havering78.5075.6086.90241
    Sutton79.2074.1087.70241
    Cumbria78.2075.4087.10240.6
    Hillingdon77.9074.4087.80240.1
    Warrington78.8074.2086.80239.8
    Windsor and Maidenhead78.3073.2088.20239.7
    Leicestershire77.6073.7088.00239.4
    Herefordshire76.8075.7086.80239.2
    York City78.0073.9086.30238.3
    Warwickshire77.1073.2087.40237.7
    Gloucestershire76.8072.9087.20237
    North Tyneside77.0074.2085.80236.9
    Gateshead75.6073.5087.60236.7
    Cambridgeshire76.1073.3086.50235.9
    West Sussex76.1071.7088.00235.8
    Lancashire76.0074.0085.40235.5
    Staffordshire76.1072.2086.80235.1
    Durham74.6074.2086.20235
    Redbridge76.9073.3084.60234.8
    Leeds75.7072.9086.00234.6
    North Lincolnshire75.6071.8087.20234.5
    Stockton-on-Tees75.8072.8085.70234.4
    Wirral77.0072.2085.20234.3
    Bexley77.1072.0085.10234.2
    Bournemouth76.1072.4085.20233.7
    Darlington74.2074.7084.30233.3
    Oxfordshire75.9071.4086.00233.3
    Brent75.2073.5084.40233.1
    Cornwall76.0071.8085.20233
    Wigan74.4073.4085.00232.9
    Essex75.8072.6084.40232.7
    Derbyshire75.7072.1084.60232.4
    Devon74.8072.0085.60232.4
    Northumberland75.6070.8086.00232.4
    Bolton75.1073.6083.60232.3
    Lincolnshire75.6072.9083.80232.3
    Wiltshire75.4070.9084.90231.2
    Torbay74.6071.9084.60231.1
    national averages757285231
    Northamptonshire75.2070.3085.50231
    Bedfordshire76.3068.8085.50230.6
    Redcar and Cleveland74.4070.9085.30230.6
    Halton74.3070.8085.20230.4
    Somerset75.2070.2084.80230.2
    Barking and Dagenham71.5070.6088.00230.1
    East Sussex74.4070.6084.60229.6
    Merton75.2069.0085.20229.4
    Suffolk75.0069.2085.10229.4
    Hammersmith and Fulham73.4071.2084.60229.2
    Slough74.1070.8084.30229.2
    Wakefield73.7071.5084.10229.2
    South Tyneside72.3073.8083.00229.1
    Hounslow73.4069.9085.80229
    Salford74.0071.9083.10229
    Ealing73.3070.9084.60228.8
    Croydon73.6070.8084.20228.5
    Norfolk73.8069.9084.50228.1
    Poole75.4067.0085.10227.5
    Calderdale72.8072.1082.30227.2
    Tameside73.2070.5083.20226.9
    Sunderland72.1070.5083.90226.6
    Isle of Wight74.9066.2085.30226.4
    Nottinghamshire72.7070.6083.20226.4
    Plymouth, City of72.9070.0083.30226.2
    Swindon71.8069.8084.40226
    Southend71.6071.2082.70225.6
    Kent74.0069.5082.00225.5
    Camden71.9070.6082.80225.4
    Brighton and Hove72.1069.8083.30225.3
    Hartlepool72.1070.0082.70224.8
    Oldham72.8070.2081.80224.8
    Worcestershire73.5068.1083.20224.8
    Telford and Wrekin72.4069.1083.00224.5
    Peterborough City73.0067.4083.90224.3
    Coventry72.6068.3082.40223.4
    Blackburn with Darwen73.5068.0081.70223.2
    Dudley72.2068.5082.10222.8
    Rotherham70.5069.9082.30222.8
    Enfield72.2068.5081.20221.8
    Kirklees71.7068.0081.90221.6
    Knowsley69.7068.0083.90221.6
    Wandsworth72.2068.7080.60221.5
    Stoke-on-Trent69.4067.7084.00221.1
    Rochdale70.0068.5081.30219.7
    North East Lincolnshire71.1068.1080.40219.6
    Luton72.0065.0081.90218.9
    Medway71.3067.4080.20218.8
    Liverpool70.2065.9082.30218.4
    Birmingham69.5067.2081.30218
    Doncaster68.7066.6082.30217.7
    Blackpool71.6066.3079.30217.2
    Islington69.4066.6080.90216.9
    Middlesbrough69.0066.9079.90215.9
    Southampton67.4065.5082.90215.8
    Tower Hamlets67.7068.5079.00215.3
    Wolverhampton70.2064.8079.90214.9
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne68.3065.3081.20214.8
    Lewisham68.6065.3080.70214.7
    Sheffield68.5065.9080.30214.7
    Barnsley67.8067.1079.60214.5
    Milton Keynes68.5064.0081.90214.4
    Derby City68.3067.0078.70214
    Portsmouth67.4066.3079.50213.3
    Kingston upon Hull City65.4066.6081.00212.9
    Reading68.6063.8079.70212.1
    Lambeth68.0065.1078.90212
    Walsall69.4063.7077.50210.6
    Waltham Forest66.4065.1078.20209.7
    Thurrock64.6063.9080.20208.8
    Leicester City64.0064.8079.30208.1
    Newham64.8064.1078.70207.6
    Manchester65.3064.4077.60207.3
    Bristol City65.7063.0078.40207.1
    Greenwich64.2062.4078.80205.4
    Haringey64.7062.8075.50202.9
    Sandwell65.0060.4077.10202.5
    Southwark65.9061.4074.90202.2
    Bradford65.9058.9073.90198.6
    Hackney62.5061.0073.70197.1
    Nottingham City60.2059.7072.70192.6

    News imageMain text

  •  WATCH/LISTEN
     ON THIS STORY
    News image The BBC's James Westhead
    reports from the school at the bottom of the league table
    News image The BBC's Mike Baker in Barking and Dagenham
    "The most improved education authority of any in England"
    See also:

    14 Dec 99 | Education
    Poor writing worries inspectors
    Internet links:


    The BBC is not responsible for the content of e