| You are in: UK | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]()
| Thursday, 25 May, 2000, 01:09 GMT 02:09 UK Police speeding policy challenged ![]() Campaigners want police to get tough on speeders Police forces in the UK are facing a legal challenge over the way speed limits are enforced. Campaigners say the decision by police not to prosecute drivers caught speeding in 30mph zones unless they are doing more than 35mph is costing lives. Pressure group Transport 2000 has been given leave to take court action to try to get the UK's chief police officers to enforce speed limits more vigorously. The 5mph "buffer" was established under rules drawn up by the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). Those rules also include imposing fixed penalties of �60, and three licence penalty points, on drivers caught doing speeds up to 50mph.
The group says the guidelines are illegal, and it is to challenge Norfolk chief constable, and head of ACPO's traffic committee, Ken Williams, in the High Court. Assistant director Lynn Sloman said government research showed someone hit by a car at 35mph was more than twice as likely to be killed as someone hit at 30mph. "We believe this edging up of the speed limit set by parliament will mean more people killed and seriously hurt on the roads," she said. "We are particularly concerned about child safety - nearly 100 children are killed or badly injured every week." Their action has won the backing of relatives of some of those killed in traffic accidents, including Brigitte Chaudhry, whose son Mansoor died after being hit by a car doing 35mph. She said police had told her the driver involved was "careless" rather than reckless. She said: "We know that at 20mph only 5% of people will die, while at 40mph 85% will die. Action defended "We know that practicalities have probably dictated this policy but we want the message that speeding is costing lives to be clear to the driving public." Mr Williams said ACPO would talk to campaigners about their concerns but would be defending the guidelines in court. "My association is committed to a strategy of contributing to the reduction of deaths and injury on the road through partnership with all those who share a common goal," he said. "We will therefore be defending this action but in the meantime I will continue to maintain a constructive dialogue with Transport 2000 with a view to resolving the differences between our two organisations." The High Court granted permission for a judicial review of the Speed Enforcement Policy, issued by ACPO in February, on Wednesday. Transport 2000 must signify their intention to take further legal action within two weeks of the ruling but campaigners say they will also be talking to ACPO officials in a bid to amend the policy. |
See also: Internet links: The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top UK stories now: Links to more UK stories are at the foot of the page. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more UK stories |
| ^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII|News Sources|Privacy | ||