Skip to main contentAccess keys help

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
BBC News
watch One-Minute World News
News imageNews image
Last Updated: Saturday, 23 September 2006, 14:47 GMT 15:47 UK
Decision over pathologist's cases
Dr Michael Heath
Dr Heath resigned after his conduct was called into question
The government could review all cases involving a Home Office pathologist who resigned from the register after criticism at a disciplinary hearing.

The forensic pathology watchdog ruled Dr Michael Heath's inadequate post-mortem examinations on two women led to their partners' murder trials.

The attorney general will now decide if all his cases should be reviewed.

He has conducted examinations in the murders of Lin and Megan Russell and the death of Stuart Lubbock.

Mr Lubbock's body was found in the swimming pool at entertainer Michael Barrymore's home in Harlow, Essex, in March 2001.

An open verdict was recorded at an inquest and no-one has been charged in connection with the death.

It will be a matter for the attorney general's office to now decide whether all his cases should be reviewed
Home Office

Dr Heath has conducted hundreds of examinations since being appointed to his role in 1991.

A Home Office spokeswomen said the Advisory Board for Forensic Pathology had been due to reconvene on Monday.

"But Dr Heath informed the members that he was resigning from the register," she added.

"The hearing has now been cancelled.

"It will be a matter for the attorney general's office to now decide whether all his cases should be reviewed."

Dr Heath was unavailable for comment on Saturday.

Questions raised

The six-week hearing in London was told that Dr Heath refused to back down on his view that the two women had been murdered despite mounting evidence to the contrary.

In one case, Steven Puaca, of Lowestoft, was jailed at Norwich Crown Court in 2002 for killing Jacqueline Tindsley, 55. Mr Puaca was later cleared by the Appeal Court.

The second involved Kenneth Fraser, who faced an Old Bailey trial, also in 2002, for murdering Mary Anne Moore, 56, but was cleared by a jury.

Charles Miskin QC, for the Home Office, told the hearing that in neither case was there any substantial evidence of unlawful killing, except Dr Heath's testimony.

Following the trial of Mr Fraser, the Home Office received a letter from three leading pathologists who disagreed with Dr Heath's assertion that Miss Moore had been battered to death.

All three agreed Ms Moore's injuries were consistent with falling down the stairs.

The board had found that, in both cases, Dr Heath's professional performance fell short of the standards required of forensic pathologists.

It also upheld 20 disciplinary charges against him.

Dr Heath had been suspended from the register pending the panel's decision.


SEE ALSO
Pathologist criticised by judges
24 Nov 05 |  Suffolk
Judges clear boyfriend of murder
10 Nov 05 |  Suffolk

RELATED INTERNET LINKS
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites



FEATURES, VIEWS, ANALYSIS
Has China's housing bubble burst?
How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire
Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit

PRODUCTS & SERVICES

AmericasAfricaEuropeMiddle EastSouth AsiaAsia Pacific