Skip to main contentAccess keys help

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
BBC News
watch One-Minute World News
News image
Last Updated: Wednesday, 14 September 2005, 09:31 GMT 10:31 UK
Truckers face cut-throat contest
By Roger Harrabin
BBC News Correspondent

Tanker at an Essex fuel terminal
Tax is not the only issue for truckers
As the country's truckers ride through the fuel protests, BBC News Correspondent Roger Harrabin finds it is cut-throat competition in haulage that is more damaging than high fuel taxes.

For the haulage industry, the real problem with rising fuel prices is that hauliers cannot pass it on to consumers, according to the Road Haulage Association.

The RHA does want Chancellor Gordon Brown to cut fuel duty.

But its spokesman said a cut in duty would probably benefit consumers, not truckers, because retailers would demand a reduction in haulage bills.

Many small hauliers would cave in because they are prepared to work for little or no profit just to stay in business.

Often small hauliers have invested a redundancy cheque from a previous job into a truck and a life on the open road, and are willing just to cover costs to stay in business.

'Never improve'

The public affairs manager of the RHA , Steve Williams, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "We almost cut our own throats because while we have got people there who are prepared to do it for a very low rate we are never going to improve, I am afraid."

He said the industry should consider measures to raise the bar for small hauliers, perhaps by demanding a bigger cash reserve for truckers wanting to take to the road.

The problem, he said, was too many small firms with between one and five trucks.

While big hauliers could negotiate fuel price supplements with their clients, small firms often did not have the time or expertise to strike deals with multiple clients.

Even when small truckers did bid for a compensation payment, the client would usually simply turn to another operator prepared to absorb the fuel price rise himself.

Increases absorbed

A new survey from one of Europe's top experts on haulage, Professor Alan Mackinnon from Heriot Watt University, showed 59% of those replying had been forced to absorb 90% or more of the recent fuel price increase.

The sample in the survey was small but the RHA said it believes its reflections to be accurate.

Professor Mackinnon said if the price rises had been passed on, the effect on consumers would have been minuscule.

Since January 2004, the diesel fuel price in the UK has risen by about 25%.

European picture

Professor Mackinnon agreed that if the Chancellor cut fuel duty, any benefits would be likely to be absorbed by retailers, not truckers.

He said trucking costs in Europe had evened out considerably since the fuel crisis in 2000.

At that time British hauliers faced 50% higher fuel bills than their Continental counterparts.

The Chancellor's decision to freeze fuel duty rises had narrowed this to 25-30%.

But when total costs to hauliers were taken into account, fuel was a less important factor to British truckers than to most others in Europe.

Aborted plan

Other factors were labour costs, vehicle Excise Duty (which was radically cut by the Chancellor) and other taxes which are higher in many countries of Europe.

The UK's haulage costs, though, are still higher than those in neighbouring countries.

The government had been planning a truckers road pricing scheme to force visiting hauliers to pay the same prices.

But the scheme has run into problems after warnings from critics that the costs of running it would outweigh the benefits.





SEE ALSO:
'Don't panic' appeal to motorists
13 Sep 05 |  Scotland
Brown blames fuel costs on Opec
11 Sep 05 |  Business
EU ministers urge oil output rise
10 Sep 05 |  Business


RELATED INTERNET LINKS:
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites


PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

AmericasAfricaEuropeMiddle EastSouth AsiaAsia Pacific