| You are in: UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Wednesday, 24 July, 2002, 17:34 GMT 18:34 UK Who are casino losers? ![]() MPs have urged the government to relax the laws on gambling, saying they don't think it will create social problems. But a similar plan on the other side of the world didn't have such a happy result. The image of a casino is one of glitz, where you might stumble on James Bond casually playing blackjack. The reality in Auckland, New Zealand, has not proved to be quite so glamorous.
Most weekdays busloads of senior citizens arrive at Sky City to play what are known as "the pokies" - row upon row of flashing-light, coin devouring slot machines. While the dire predictions of many casino opponents - gangland takeovers, pawn shops, extortion, money lenders and more prostitution - have proved largely unfounded, the pokies have spread. They could soon be seen in pubs and bars across Auckland and are now throughout the whole country. Countrywide spread Last year New Zealanders gambled NZ$8.4bn (�2.5bn) - more than the NZ$7.3bn the country spends on all health services.
The total spent on gambling in 1984 - before liberalisation - was just $890 million (�264m). It is the spread of these pokie machines, that Ralph Gerdelan, executive director of New Zealand's Problem Gambling Foundation, says is the result of allowing a government-endorsed casino to set up shop. "Once you normalise accessibility to large casinos then the rest of the industry says: 'We've got to have it too - if they can have it in that building then why can't we have it down the road in our building?' It makes it very difficult for a regulator to maintain some kind of distinction." The best intentions of confining electronic gambling to venues where they are strictly controlled, are quickly watered down when they come under commercial pressure from commercial interest groups, he says. Addiction An impact study on the Auckland casino conducted by Gerdelan's foundation found the number of problem gamblers asking for help accelerated by more 50% in six months following its opening, a rate which later levelled off to 30%, where it has since stayed.
A security guard found her baby - severely dehydrated, but thankfully alive - screaming in the car, before alerting authorities. In two years of spending most of her social welfare benefits at the casino, Faumuina's biggest win had been just NZ$1,000 (�300). Most of the time she lost. She has since been ordered by a court to undergo parenting and anti-gambling courses. Sky City, which happily accepted her money, has since banned her from the premises for two years. Advertising allure She said she had found it difficult to explain why she kept returning to the casino, but says she was attracted by advertising campaigns promoting regular winners and a desire to escape the stresses of single motherhood.
Sky City is one of New Zealand's most successful businesses and is now regarded as a blue chip sharemarket investment. The casino has 1400 pokie machines and more than 90 gambling tables and has since applied for permission to install another 230 machines and 12 tables. Help programmes Numbers of machines outside casinos have almost quadrupled in the past 12 years, from 4,600 in March 1989 to 17,700 at the end of 2001 - the equivalent of two big casinos opening every year.
It had introduced self- barring, which encouraged customers to voluntarily bar themselves from gaming areas. Clocks had recently been installed and alcohol programmes started. There is currently a moratorium on applications for casino licences in New Zealand, which expires next year. No-one knows what decision the Wellington parliament may make when the moratorium expires, but one thing is clear - the casino owners, and the government through its taxes, will be collecting the winnings. Do you think the government is right to relax the laws on gambling? Add your views using the form below. This country has no need of these establishments or the problems they bring, mainly to the less well off in our society trying to improve their lot. We have enough slot-machines as it is, please don't bring in more! I frequently visit Las Vegas, and the casinos provide many other forms of entertainment aside from the gambling. They also incorporate some of the biggest and best hotels in the world at very reasonable prices. It is by far the fastest growing city in the US, providing an ever increasing number of jobs. It would be one of the most cynical method of increasing taxes I could imagine. A lot of people (myself included) are mugs. We expect games to be fair and it can take a long time to realise that gambling is fundamentally an unfair game. Yes, we should relax the laws. When I was in Australia I visited similar Casinos to the one in NZ, and I believe they are a great social venue, and a further asset to the local community in terms of jobs and tax revenue. The benefits far outweigh the possible small minority who may become addicted to gambling. Despite dire predictions, Ontario has not experienced a huge increase in crime or problem gambling since three large casinos were opened. The first, in Windsor, although managed by a private company, is owned by the provincial government, and in addition to providing a large number of jobs, it puts hundreds of millions of dollars into the provincial coffers each year. Alan T. Relaxing gambling laws is fine, it would bring a new buoyant industry to the UK creating thousands of jobs and an additional revenue for the Government, HOWEVER, potentially allowing gamblers to use Credit cards is a disaster waiting to happen, no one should be allowed to gamble with money that isn't in their pockets or bank accounts. We already have slot machines in every pub and club in the UK. So that type of addiction cannot increase. Disclaimer: The BBC will put up as many of your comments as possible but we cannot guarantee that all e-mails will be published. The BBC reserves the right to edit comments that are published. | See also: 26 Mar 02 | UK 24 Jul 02 | Politics 26 Mar 02 | Politics Internet links: The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top UK stories now: Links to more UK stories are at the foot of the page. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more UK stories |
![]() | ||
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> | To BBC World Service>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |