| You are in: UK | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Thursday, 12 July, 2001, 19:10 GMT 20:10 UK Head to Head: The road-building debate ![]() The government's decision to reject plans for the controversial Hastings bypass has delighted conservationists but angered many residents and businesses. Gillian Bargery, co-ordinator for the "Hastings Alliance - Better than the Bypasses" movement, and Graham How, of the 1066 Enterprise which fought for the Hastings bypass, give their reaction to the decision. Gillian Bargery, Hastings Alliance
However, it is important that this decision is not seen as a concession to environmentalists, so that another road can be slipped through elsewhere. The decision was taken, and quite rightly, because none of the arguments in favour of the road held water.
Nonetheless, campaigners will remain vigilant. The South Coast Corridor Multi-modal Study is now underway - a study looking at the transport infrastructure along the whole South Coast from Southampton to Thanet. We must be clear that a road-based solution will not be acceptable, because road building is entirely discredited. The immediate priorities in Hastings now are to expedite the public transport improvements recommended by the consultants and endorsed by the government.
It is now a priority that all influential people in the town come together to look at ways of bringing regeneration to the centre of Hastings where it is needed, and of keeping the prosperity in Hastings rather than having it based outside the town as the bypasses would have done. In broader terms, anti-road campaigners will continue to fight against any proposed road schemes nationally - evidence and precedence have shown us for many years now that road schemes neither solve congestion, nor bring guaranteed prosperity to poor areas. Graham How, 1066 Enterprise
As the owner of a business operating from Hastings town centre, I find it quite stunning that the secretary of state finds no "convincing case" for the Hastings and Bexhill bypasses. We are not just talking about the regeneration of Hastings, we are talking about the saving of Hastings.
A road that runs along the seafront of a seaside resort and cuts a beautiful old town in half. They will still have to suffer the endless, crawling traffic jam that makes the five miles between Hastings and Bexhill a 30 minute trial whatever the time of day. In 2001, it takes longer to drive to Brighton, Tunbridge Wells and Maidstone than it did a decade ago. The train to London (when it's running and not a health risk) takes 10 minutes longer than in the last days of steam. The government's arguments are, I'm afraid, naive. They appear to have totally missed the point. The whole "Access to Hastings" argument seems to have been completely disregarded in favour of "future proposals" to regenerate just five wards within the town. |
See also: Internet links: The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top UK stories now: Links to more UK stories are at the foot of the page. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more UK stories |
| ^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII|News Sources|Privacy | ||