BBC HomepageWorld ServiceEducation
BBC Homepagelow graphics version | feedback | help
BBC News Online
 You are in: UK
News image
Front Page 
World 
UK 
England 
Northern Ireland 
Scotland 
Wales 
UK Politics 
Business 
Sci/Tech 
Health 
Education 
Entertainment 
Talking Point 
In Depth 
AudioVideo 
News image



The BBC's Tom Symonds
"Inspectors believe the 10 operators have more to do"
 real 56k

ATOC Director Steve Bence
"We take every incident very, very seriously"
 real 56k

Dep chief inspector of the railways Dr Bob Smallwood
"There needs to be action taken now"
 real 28k

Thames Trains' Communications Mgr Jonathan Radleigh
"Everybody in the industry is working very hard to reduce the number of Spads"
 real 28k

Friday, 29 June, 2001, 01:08 GMT 02:08 UK
Rail firms warned over signal danger
Signal gantry and track
Trains passed red signals 56 times in May
Britain's rail safety watchdog has warned 10 train companies they are not doing enough to prevent drivers passing red signals.

A letter has been sent out coinciding with the publication of figures showing the number of signals passed at danger (Spads) last month was higher than the same month last year.

Firms warned
Thames Trains
Great Western
Anglia
Arriva Trains
Merseyside
Cardiff Railway
Great Eastern
GNER
Wales & West
ScotRail
Connex South Central
The operators have been told by the Railway Inspectorate they face enforcement action, and potential prosecutions, if safety records are not improved.

The inspectorate, part of the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), has also written to all Britain's train companies about their "unacceptable" approach to dealing with signals particularly prone to Spad incidents.

The moves come despite last year's Ladbroke Grove train crash, which killed 31 people and involved a signal passed at danger, and last week's highly critical Cullen Report into the tragedy.

Worsening records

Eight of the companies received letters because their 2000-01 Spads record was worse than the previous 12 months.

Two others - ScotRail and Connex South Central - were warned because their record had only improved slightly.

All the companies have been given until 13 July to explain how they plan to improve.

Spads in May
56 in total
22 rated serious compared to 18 a year ago
4 led to derailment
3 led to track damage
29 at location with Spad history
8 overran signal by over 200 yards
The HSE said that there were 56 instances of trains passing signals at danger in May 2001 - 21 more than in May 2000 and seven more than the average figure for this month over the last six years.

Although overall the figures have dropped over the past year, this is the first time that a monthly average over the last six years has been exceeded since June 1999.

Transport minister John Spellar said: "Naturally I am concerned at these latest figures.

"The problem is not new and the industry's response to the problem has been far too patchy.

John Spellar
John Spellar: 'Working practices must improve'
"The industry must get a firm grip on the problem and deal with it."

And he said Wednesday's near-miss, when two Connex South Eastern trains came within a coach-length of a head-on crash, "only serves to underline the vital importance of tackling this immediately".

Connex South Eastern has announced plans for a "zero tolerance" policy on Spads as a result of the incident.

Action ordered

The HSE letter sent out to the companies refers to action ordered in September 1999 to improve the 22 signals most passed at danger.

They included signal 109, passed at danger in the Ladbroke Grove rail crash.

The companies were given until March 2001 to complete the improvements.

In the HSE's letter the companies are warned that:

  • Asking for an extension of the new deadline of September 2001 is unacceptable.

  • In some cases, action on multi-Spads is "not receiving sufficient attention and commitment from management".

  • There is also a lack of management attention and commitment in Spad management audit process.

  • Some trains have fitted, but are not using, a driver reminder appliance to prevent trains leaving stations when the signal is against them.

  • In the case of repeat-incident drivers - those who had been through a signal before - "there may be a deeper problem than needs to be addressed".

    Further attention has been focused on Spads by the HSE with the publication of an independent report into the way the incidents are investigated.

    Rail consultancy WS Atkins says it is "not convinced" measures to improve signals already passed at danger are properly transferred to signals with a potential problem.

    As a result of the report, the HSE is changing the criteria for looking at Spads to include the likelihood of severe consequences and not just the distance that trains pass a danger signal

  • News imageSearch BBC News Online
    News image
    News image
    News imageNews image
    Advanced search options
    News image
    Launch console
    News image
    News image
    News imageBBC RADIO NEWS
    News image
    News image
    News imageBBC ONE TV NEWS
    News image
    News image
    News imageWORLD NEWS SUMMARY
    News image
    News image
    News image
    News image
    News imageNews imageNews imageNews imagePROGRAMMES GUIDE
    Internet links:


    The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

    Links to more UK stories are at the foot of the page.


    E-mail this story to a friend

    Links to more UK stories



    News imageNews image