BBC HomepageWorld ServiceEducation
BBC Homepagelow graphics version | feedback | help
BBC News Online
 You are in: UK
News image
Front Page 
World 
UK 
England 
Northern Ireland 
Scotland 
Wales 
UK Politics 
Business 
Sci/Tech 
Health 
Education 
Entertainment 
Talking Point 
In Depth 
AudioVideo 
News image

Wednesday, 20 June, 2001, 15:04 GMT 16:04 UK
Al-Fayed loses legal costs fight
Mohamed al-Fayed
Mohamed al-Fayed was asking for �1.3m
Harrods boss Mohamed al-Fayed has lost his court battle to recover �1.3m in legal costs arising from Neil Hamilton's failed libel action against him.

Eight people who had given the former MP financial backing were cleared of any liability to pay at the High Court on Wednesday.

The judge also said he would make Mr al-Fayed pay the legal costs incurred by the backers in opposing his application. They are estimated to be around �100,000.

Christine and Neil Hamilton
Neil Hamilton has been declared bankrupt
The Harrods boss is still owed most of the legal fees from the trial, in which Mr Hamilton tried to sue him for libel after he said he had paid the former MP for Tatton to ask questions in parliament.

Summing up on Wednesday, Mr Justice Morland said he had come to the conclusion that it would be "unjust and unreasonable" to make any orders for costs in favour of Mr al-Fayed.

The judge said he would give full reasons for his decision at a later date.

Each backer was separately represented by leading and junior counsel and solicitors.

The judge said separate representation was "eminently reasonable and necessary" because of their different interests and circumstances.

Bankrupt

The eight were named in court as: The Duke of Devonshire, Richard Clay, Christopher Sharples, David Wills, Sir Robert McAlpine Ltd, the Earl of Portsmouth, Lord Hanson, and Taki Theodoracopulus.

Mr al-Fayed's claim against seven other individuals has been settled.

James Price QC, for Mr al-Fayed, had told the judge that Mr al-Fayed had incurred costs of nearly �1.5m plus interest defending the action.

He was still owed just over �1.2m plus �144,000 interest.

Mr Price had also told the judge that a fighting fund, and Lord Portsmouth - who effectively "underwrote" it - contributed �466,321 to Mr Hamilton's costs.

Mr Hamilton did not pay anything towards the costs, although he pledged his house when it appeared likely that there would be a shortfall.

It was clear that, but for the fund, the libel action would never have been brought or continued, said Mr Price.

In May this year, Mr Hamilton was declared bankrupt in the aftermath of the 1999 trial.

He is reported to have debts in the region of �3 million.

He had claimed that the bankruptcy petition was issued by Mr al-Fayed as "an act of revenge knowing he would get nothing out of it".

News imageSearch BBC News Online
News image
News image
News imageNews image
Advanced search options
News image
Launch console
News image
News image
News imageBBC RADIO NEWS
News image
News image
News imageBBC ONE TV NEWS
News image
News image
News imageWORLD NEWS SUMMARY
News image
News image
News image
News image
News imageNews imageNews imageNews imagePROGRAMMES GUIDE
Internet links:


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Links to more UK stories are at the foot of the page.


E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more UK stories



News imageNews image