| You are in: UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Thursday, 14 June, 2001, 13:19 GMT 14:19 UK Blair II - The Sequel: What now for transport? ![]() Tony Blair's success or failure is likely to be judged on three key public services. So what are the benchmarks? In the first of a three-part series, Jonathan Duffy looks at the future for transport. Transport was the dog that didn't bite during the election campaign, but if Labour is to succeed in its second term it has to get Britain moving again. To do so would mean cutting road congestion, revamping the railways and encouraging more motorists to switch to public transport. Tony Blair might call it "radical", but to commuters in Zurich, in Switzerland, there's nothing new about leaving the car at home. With a population of about 300,000, the city is similar in size to Coventry, where more than 75% of journeys are made by car. In Zurich, the figure is more like 30%. Zurich's streets are criss-crossed by a network of routes for: Work has also started on building a �5bn national high-speed railway - Bahn 2000 - which will link the city with Basel, Berne and Geneva.
Trams have an automatic right of way while buses run in dedicated lanes and have dedicated traffic signals that give them priority at junctions. "The system is fully integrated so buses meet trams, trams meet trains. This is very important because people want to get from A to B quickly, without waiting," says Mr Schiesser. Price is also a key factor. For �50 a year, anyone can buy a half-price national rail card while in Zurich, as in most big towns, there is a common ticketing system for all types of local public transport. Further efforts to cut car dependence include a new city-wide cycle route network, a 20mph speed limit on residential streets and a scheme to rent cars cheaply to non-car owners for out of town trips. In Britain it's a very different story. Last year's Hatfield crash had a devastating effect on the already sagging rail network and droves of commuters, faced with dire delays, deserted rail for road. Recent fare increases mean Britain's railways are among the most expensive in the world.
The government has forecast in 20 years' time motor traffic levels on Britain's already congested roads will have increased by between 36% and 57%. However, it has announced money for 25 new tram lines in regional centres around England. Meanwhile, a pilot scheme in Edinburgh similar to Zurich's, which rented cars cheaply to non-car owners for non-local trips, collapsed this year because of lack of interest. It depends on which side of the fence you sit. Motoring organisations and hauliers back government plans to spend �60bn on building new roads and widening old ones to help free-up traffic. Critics say new roads will only bring more traffic and leave highways as congested as before. The pressure group Transport 2000 wants Labour to put more emphasis on integrated rail and bus services. The government wants to keep both sides happy and believes it can, by combining its road plans with promoting integrated transport solutions. To achieve this in his second term, Transport 2000 believes Mr Blair must take the following steps: Some of your comments on transport: What isn't covered in the report above is how Zurich's integrated transport system is funded. Public transport in continental Europe is generally heavily subsidised, where as in the UK it is pathetically underfunded. Meanwhile, people still moan about paying too much tax. Ultimately we get what we pay for! If the government wants to sort our chronic transport system, it must focus immediately on investing heavily in our dilapidated rail and bus services. Once these are improved, and become cheap, efficient and easy to use, then road traffic congestion should begin to ease as commuters switch from their cars to public services. This in turn would save the government from having to spend millions on projects such as widening roads or building new bypasses. As a UK citizen living in Munich I have realised the tremendous asset of a good public transport network. This is the third biggest city in Germany, yet not once in the past year have I felt the desire or need to use a car. Tram, undergrounds and buses mean that no location is isolated and for around 20 pounds per month I have unlimited use of the services. This is what we need in the UK! Having recently returned from Australia on holiday I was amazed by how few cars there were on the streets of Perth. The reason was simple, free public transport in Perth and all the sorounding areas. If the goverment has the guts to subsidise such measures here in the UK I'm sure we would see the same numbers of people leave the car at home. I have said for years that the Young Persons Railcard should not be subject to restrictions preventing the purchase of tickets at peak times. To halt the increase in car use people must be able to use public transport cheaply and easily as soon as they enter the world of work (if not before). Once people start commuting in their cars, it is hard to break the habit when in reality travelling by train (strikes and disasters permitting) is faster, less stressful in the rush hour, and more convenient. A scheme like that illustrated in Zurich seems sensible, but the Government have little interest in public transport. The railways have been privatised and the buses deregulated, why should it get involved with public transport? |
Internet links: The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top UK stories now: Links to more UK stories are at the foot of the page. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more UK stories |
| ^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII|News Sources|Privacy | ||