BBC HomepageWorld ServiceEducation
BBC Homepagelow graphics version | feedback | help
BBC News Online
 You are in: UK
News image
Front Page 
World 
UK 
England 
Northern Ireland 
Scotland 
Wales 
UK Politics 
Business 
Sci/Tech 
Health 
Education 
Entertainment 
Talking Point 
In Depth 
AudioVideo 
News image

Thursday, 14 June, 2001, 13:19 GMT 14:19 UK
Blair II - The Sequel: What now for transport?

Tony Blair's success or failure is likely to be judged on three key public services. So what are the benchmarks? In the first of a three-part series, Jonathan Duffy looks at the future for transport.

Transport was the dog that didn't bite during the election campaign, but if Labour is to succeed in its second term it has to get Britain moving again.

To do so would mean cutting road congestion, revamping the railways and encouraging more motorists to switch to public transport.


Tony Blair might call it "radical", but to commuters in Zurich, in Switzerland, there's nothing new about leaving the car at home.

With a population of about 300,000, the city is similar in size to Coventry, where more than 75% of journeys are made by car. In Zurich, the figure is more like 30%.

Zurich's streets are criss-crossed by a network of routes for:

  • buses
  • trams, and
  • railways (of the commuter, inter-city and funicular varieties)

    Work has also started on building a �5bn national high-speed railway - Bahn 2000 - which will link the city with Basel, Berne and Geneva.


    Count the lines: A tram map of downtown Zurich
    Wherever possible in Zurich, public transport gets priority, says Hans Kaspar Schiesser, of the Swiss transport pressure group Verkehrsclub Der Schweiz.

    Trams have an automatic right of way while buses run in dedicated lanes and have dedicated traffic signals that give them priority at junctions.

    "The system is fully integrated so buses meet trams, trams meet trains. This is very important because people want to get from A to B quickly, without waiting," says Mr Schiesser.

    Price is also a key factor. For �50 a year, anyone can buy a half-price national rail card while in Zurich, as in most big towns, there is a common ticketing system for all types of local public transport.

    Further efforts to cut car dependence include a new city-wide cycle route network, a 20mph speed limit on residential streets and a scheme to rent cars cheaply to non-car owners for out of town trips.


    In Britain it's a very different story. Last year's Hatfield crash had a devastating effect on the already sagging rail network and droves of commuters, faced with dire delays, deserted rail for road. Recent fare increases mean Britain's railways are among the most expensive in the world.


    Another derailment, this time at Virginia Water, Surrey
    Bus use has been in decline for 50 years, although recently it has begun to grow at around 1%, and the UK has some of the highest car mileage per head, per year, in Europe, even though car ownership is lower than countries such as Switzerland.

    The government has forecast in 20 years' time motor traffic levels on Britain's already congested roads will have increased by between 36% and 57%. However, it has announced money for 25 new tram lines in regional centres around England.

    Meanwhile, a pilot scheme in Edinburgh similar to Zurich's, which rented cars cheaply to non-car owners for non-local trips, collapsed this year because of lack of interest.


    It depends on which side of the fence you sit. Motoring organisations and hauliers back government plans to spend �60bn on building new roads and widening old ones to help free-up traffic.

    Critics say new roads will only bring more traffic and leave highways as congested as before. The pressure group Transport 2000 wants Labour to put more emphasis on integrated rail and bus services.

    The government wants to keep both sides happy and believes it can, by combining its road plans with promoting integrated transport solutions. To achieve this in his second term, Transport 2000 believes Mr Blair must take the following steps:

  • Cut public transport fares and issue tax-free vouchers to commuters. Also introduce travelcards for urban centres and a national discount railcard (similar to that used in Switzerland)
  • Make railways the centre of an integrated network, by improving taxi, bus and cycle links with stations
  • Establish high-frequency turn-up-and-go bus and tram services in all main centres, and give buses and trams priority over cars.


    Some of your comments on transport:

    What isn't covered in the report above is how Zurich's integrated transport system is funded. Public transport in continental Europe is generally heavily subsidised, where as in the UK it is pathetically underfunded. Meanwhile, people still moan about paying too much tax. Ultimately we get what we pay for!
    Lisa, UK

    If the government wants to sort our chronic transport system, it must focus immediately on investing heavily in our dilapidated rail and bus services. Once these are improved, and become cheap, efficient and easy to use, then road traffic congestion should begin to ease as commuters switch from their cars to public services. This in turn would save the government from having to spend millions on projects such as widening roads or building new bypasses.
    Tim Dams, UK

    As a UK citizen living in Munich I have realised the tremendous asset of a good public transport network. This is the third biggest city in Germany, yet not once in the past year have I felt the desire or need to use a car. Tram, undergrounds and buses mean that no location is isolated and for around 20 pounds per month I have unlimited use of the services. This is what we need in the UK!
    David Amini, Germany

    Having recently returned from Australia on holiday I was amazed by how few cars there were on the streets of Perth. The reason was simple, free public transport in Perth and all the sorounding areas. If the goverment has the guts to subsidise such measures here in the UK I'm sure we would see the same numbers of people leave the car at home.
    Frazer Auld, Scotland

    I have said for years that the Young Persons Railcard should not be subject to restrictions preventing the purchase of tickets at peak times. To halt the increase in car use people must be able to use public transport cheaply and easily as soon as they enter the world of work (if not before). Once people start commuting in their cars, it is hard to break the habit when in reality travelling by train (strikes and disasters permitting) is faster, less stressful in the rush hour, and more convenient.
    A. Davey, UK

    A scheme like that illustrated in Zurich seems sensible, but the Government have little interest in public transport. The railways have been privatised and the buses deregulated, why should it get involved with public transport?
    Richard Crossley, UK

  • News imageSearch BBC News Online
    News image
    News image
    News imageNews image
    Advanced search options
    News image
    Launch console
    News image
    News image
    News imageBBC RADIO NEWS
    News image
    News image
    News imageBBC ONE TV NEWS
    News image
    News image
    News imageWORLD NEWS SUMMARY
    News image
    News image
    News image
    News image
    News imageNews imageNews imageNews imagePROGRAMMES GUIDE
    See also:

    20 Jul 00 | UK Politics
    Transport 2010 at a glance
    Internet links:


    The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

    Links to more UK stories are at the foot of the page.


    E-mail this story to a friend

    Links to more UK stories



    News imageNews image