| You are in: UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Friday, 13 April, 2001, 10:45 GMT 11:45 UK Tank nears end of the road ![]() The Challenger II is heavy and difficult to transport Just 100 years after Colonel Ernest Swinton had a kernel of an idea, military chiefs have accepted that the traditional heavy battletank has had its day. An enduring image of dozens of wars since its debut on the Somme in World War I, the mighty tank will eventually be replaced by a smaller combat vehicle. Major General Peter Gilchrist, master general of the ordnance, has indicated in a speech that the relatively new Challenger II will be the last of its kind.
Military designers are already looking at sophisticated lightweight armour and stealth capabilities, while March 2000 saw the development of a plastic tank. Modern tanks have played a crucial role in numerous wars, but with their large weight and size can be cumbersome and an easy target for planes. Not obsolete The new breed of armoured vehicle would need the same firepower and protection but would be easier to transport on planes and quicker on the field of battle. But a spokesman for the MoD told BBC News Online that the Army's 350 Challenger II tanks are not obsolete and will continue to play a vital role until they are phased out around 2025. "Technological development in the tank is moving towards lighter materials - by 2025, the next generation will probably take account of lighter equipment, using a lighter vehicle. "There will be no change in the capability requirement but current technology cannot deliver it except by heavy armour. "It is still probably one of the best tanks in the world." Symbolic dimension Patrick Wright, author of a cultural history of the tank, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme the heavy battletank was of symbolic importance. "People talk about it as a rational instrument of warfare but it has always had a symbolic dimension - it is a monstrous object that crawls towards you and scares you half to death. "Its symbolic force is very well attuned to the requirements of peacekeeping where you don't want to kill people - what is better for establishing your presence than a tank on a bridge."
"From one point of view the tank is dead - the 70-ton monster that crawled around the battlefield in a Cold War context will be replaced, but by something that brings to the battlefield the exact same characteristics. "I don't think it is anything to do with virility symbols ... it is about capability - a mobile, agile, well-protected land platform with overwhelming firepower. "It will probably take about 20-25 years to get there but the industry like Vickers working with Dera [Defence Evaluation and Research Agency] are starting to develop this technology. "It will be fielded in a much smaller package so it can react to the strategic context of deployment over much greater areas than in the Cold War era. "Like the cavalry moved from the horse to the tank, the tank crew moved from the first hulks that crossed the battlefield at Cambrai to what we have now - we all move on." |
See also: Internet links: The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top UK stories now: Links to more UK stories are at the foot of the page. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more UK stories |
| ^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII|News Sources|Privacy | ||