This is a second page of your comments about President Bush's State visit to Britain.
The following comments reflect the balance of views we have received:
I think Mr Bush should not be welcome in Britain, He has a polarising effect on all the peoples of the world he gets in contact with. He will rubbish Blair' image to the British and the rest of the world.
Daniel Njolomba, Kitwe, Zambia
I am sure many in Britain would be happy to have President Bush stop by for a little pomp and ceremony, and I think it would be good for him to do a little tour of the 'free' world to finally learn the opinions of those he "respectfully disagree[d]" with.
Eric Hovius, Ancaster, Canada
 |  People should turn out in their thousands on the streets of London  |
People should turn out in their thousands on the streets of London and wherever Bush is scheduled to go. However, instead of vocal protestations and banner waving, how about complete silence and a mass turning of backs to the cavalcade?
Heike Bley, Glasgow There are some that constantly seek out the dark and negative side and there are those whose only concern is the bright and positive. To the begrudging protesters, may they continue to wallow in their dark and dingy existence. To the rest may they reflect the joy of the occasion. God Bless the United Kingdom and its greatest ally, the USA.
Jack, London, UK
Of course! And UK citizens who oppose the US war should be allowed to voice their disagreement. Hopefully he will respond, although it is unlikely.
Dominick Antonucci, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
1) I hope the protest groups watch the security procedure very carefully, and seek judicial review if any British rights are even slightly infringed by this invasion of foreign security agencies,
2) to all the people who think the Iraqis can't protest - who do you think is shooting at "the coalition" then?
Simon Richardson, London, UK
Bush should visit the UK and the protestors should be given free flights to visit Saddam's mass graves in Iraq, particularly the active ones where sobbing relatives are desperately trying to recover the bones. When did the left lose its moral compass?
John Kerr, New York USA
| If the peaceful protests are successful in delivering their popular democratic message maybe Bush and Blair might learn something |
It is sad that in the 21st century two major democracies still have to resort to war in the name of peace. Bush should be welcome in Britain and if the peaceful protests are successful in delivering their popular democratic message maybe Bush and Blair might learn something i.e. you don't have to drop bombs to make a point. Crushing the enemy often just makes them stronger.
Niall, Ireland As free citizens in a free country it is your right and duty to protest those people or policies with which you disagree. As for whether President Bush visiting the UK 'officially' is a good idea, if he wants to build support for his international policies, be they misguided or not, he needs to speak to those people who disagree with him the most, namely Europeans. This also is his right and duty. God bless the UK!
Ken, Phoenix, USA
If I remember correctly we do in fact live in a democracy with the right to free speech, one of the things both Bush and Blair want to provide the Iraqi people with. So why is it then that the British people are once again having our democratic right taken away. The United States may have gone to war via a democracy as a majority of their people wanted the war, but the majority of British people didn't, yet Blair disregarded our democracy. I do not agree with Bush's policies but we must not forget that we should be just as disappointed in Blair.
Joe, UK
Whatever happens, Bush & Co. will have the "spin" people working overtime so that the "correct" version of what happened gets shown on our nightly TV propaganda shows. I don't know if he is the worst president we ever had, but he sure is fighting hard for that bottom spot. Lies, no matter how oft and steadfastly repeated, are still lies.
Nan Hamlton, Chicago, USA
If I were in UK I would certainly protest. George W Bush shouldn't be welcome ANYWHERE.
Alasdair MacLean, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
Why not? This provides a good opportunity for people in the UK to demonstrate against his policy. Also, this is a good opportunity to remember what Tony Blair did. Media in the UK should re-broadcast their announcement of the invasion to Iraq and should ask 'where is the WMD you were talking about?'.
Aki, California
I see nothing wrong with President Bush going to the UK on a State visit - we are allies. For those who are angry over the amount of money spent for security-well that's the price you pay for being a country. Do you think we in the US like that we have to pay for every Head of State (including Tony Blair) coming to the UN and disrupting traffic in New York City. Or the fact that every country represented in the UN doesn't pay there parking tickets or speeding tickets because of diplomatic immunity. Hey England-lighten up, what are you France.
Mike Daly, Hackettstown, NJ I'm not a supporter of Bush, but as this is an official state visit the capacity in which arrives, not the man himself should be what the British public receive. Therefore they should welcome an ally. Now if Bush was over to appear on Newsnight then by all means go at him with bugles sounding. Unfortunately, there is also a good point that many people who protest in England turn up to cause trouble not to protest and the last thing the Brits needs is for the world to see more riots in its capital.
Gareth, US
I think Bush should come to the UK with a minimal amount of security. He should be forced to recognize the protesters and face the disapproval of his behaviour throughout the world.
Anon, New York
A question to all Blair and Bush bashers- how would you have dealt with Saddam?
Jon, USA
JON, USA asks how we would deal with Saddam. The way we dealt with him since 1992 would be sufficient Jon. As you now know as well as the rest of the herd of sheep you belong to know, HE POSED NO THREAT TO OUR SECURITY NOR ANY OTHER COUNTRY. Bush LIED and the resulting deaths of innocent people in and out of the military are reason enough to protest.
Bob, Chicago, USA
BOB, USA says: HE POSED NO THREAT TO OUR SECURITY NOR ANY OTHER COUNTRY. In fact Saddam did pose a threat, he attacked Kuwait (90s), how can one forget that? Saddam unleashed weapons, during the Iraq war, missiles that travelled way over what was allowed and reached....Kuwait. Saddam was a threat to ALL those around him. What makes you so special believing he was no threat to you?
Trevor, The Netherlands
| The right to protest is often cited in the US but rarely encouraged |
Living outside the United States the people of Britain and Europe have a much broader perspective on World affairs. The right to protest is often cited in the US but rarely encouraged and it does not help when millions of Americans take to the streets to protest the invasion of Iraq and George Bush refers to them as a "focus group". This administration says they want to bring Democracy to Iraq maybe they should take a good hard look at themselves first. (Vis-�-vis the "Patriot" Act) The British would do us all proud by showing the people of the United States what the rest of the world thinks about George W Bush's administration.
Lloyd Cox, Seattle US Why should the British people spend 5 million pounds for Bush to visit, when the US president will be doing all he can to avoid meeting his generous hosts?
Ian Henderson, UK
Bush is exerting his democratic right to visit another country. If his presence is a threat to security then he may be refused entry, just like anyone else would be.
Jonathan Hauxwell, England
I have to say it is nice to wake up everyday knowing what a great ally we have. It makes it even better knowing that our ally is a democratic nation so why not protest? At least that is one of the reasons that our beloved soldiers are giving their lives every day.
Saffar, Cincinnati, Ohio
You know....all I can say is THANK GOD we did have two men like Bush and Blair to finally combat terrorism and Iraq...and whoever else wants to kill innocent people. The bashers from England make me sick. I pray that a 9/11 doesn't happen to you, but if it does, you will all be singing a different tune.
Eric, Hamlin
So Jack Straw is upset that those of us protesting against Bush didn't protest against Saddam. It's true that I never protested against Saddam, but I suspect I would have done if he had been invited here as an honoured guest of Her Majesty.
Adam, UK
I am not anti-American or anti-war, but find Bush abhorrent. He dishes our huge favours to the companies that paid for his election campaign. In the Bush world you are free to do what your government tells you.
Julian, UK
Mr. Bush is as entitled to visit Britain as the people of Britain should be as entitled to voice their opinion to him. The real question is not whether Bush is made welcome - but when did it become acceptable for democratic governments to designate Free Speech Areas (conveniently located for Government purposes far away from Bush)? What's next - they will designate what we can and cannot say and when it's okay to say what we are told we should say? [Note: Unfortunately Bush has already acknowledged that he doesn't read newspapers or watch news shows - so he'll never hear about the protests anyway.]
Kathleen Carroll, New York, USA
| Do the people who express so much hatred and dislike towards Mr Bush have an opinion on Saddam? |
Do the people who express so much hatred and dislike towards Mr Bush have an opinion on Saddam? They must all think that Saddam was a good leader/ruler. I didn't see them out protesting in the streets about the murder and oppression in Iraq before the war. If the "do-gooder's" of the world had shown half as much hatred towards Saddam prior to the war, it may all have been different!
Richard D, England Isn't it ironic that the people protesting the war in both Britain and the US (still the vast minority) actually have the right to protest, whereas only a few months ago the Iraqi's didn't? Please, before you bash the fight against terrorism and talk about all of the blood on Bush/Blair's hands, think of the blood on Saddam's hands, and how many would be dead if he were still in power.
Anthony Gallegos, USA
For those who are unaware of how they keep dissent invisible in the US you should know that the US secret service is removing people with protesting signs from the path of Mr. Bush and placing them in remote areas called "free speech areas". In case of refusal to comply (as in the case of Bill Neel and his sister) you get arrested. Now the Bush administration will try to keep dissent invisible in the UK also.
Annia Papadimou, Athens Greece
Jack Straw said "Many more people I guess will be demonstrating about the United States and the action which the United States has had to take since Sept 11, than ever demonstrated against the brutal vicious regime of Saddam Hussein"...again an important politician misses the point. The American and British people were lied to about the reasons for war (WMD never found) and as we are supposed to live in free speaking democracies, then one could say that a lie to the people is as bad as it could get. Of course Saddam was brutal and vicious, but his was a dictatorship and as such that is how dictators rule. That does not excuse the lies we have been told by the US and UK governments over the last year.
Mark Darlington, London
We in America always consider the UK as our closest ally in every aspect. Yes , there have been few disagreements in past year, but it will be foolish to throw away all the history we created together in the past. I hope English welcome Mr. Bush as a friend rather than an enemy. Remember we, the Americans, are your friends. So what if you disagree with us on a few occasions?
Sam, USA
| Years from now this visit will be remembered with pride by Londoners |
One of the many grievances (most of which are irrational) that my European friends have is that Bush never visits the great cities of Europe. After reading the balance of views I can see why he does not. In the eyes of most of the anti-war/anti-bush/anti-America types, whatever the president does and says will be regarded with suspicion and scorn. Despite the protests Bush should visit because there apparently are some UK citizens who welcome the visit and Britain is the best ally of the US. Years from now when Iraq and most of the Middle East are free this visit will be remembered with pride by Londoners, many of whom will be protesting at the time.
Colin Keesee, USA I didn't have any particular urge to protest - I'm not that bothered about Bush and while I didn't care for the war its now a done deal, BUT I do care about anyone who threatens to take away my right to protest which is a cornerstone of our democracy. Someone pass me a placard and a whistle please.
Tom, England
I will be attending the protests when George comes over, I just really hope we can get close enough to let him know what an informed democracy makes of him as opposed to he regular, media-controlled one. I hope he gets the scare of his life.
John Keegans, Nottingham, UK
| Of course the leader of an ally should be welcomed to our country |
Of course the leader of an ally should be welcomed to our country. But if that leader is a proponent of democracy, which he claims to be, then he should not deny our citizens the most fundamental of democratic rights, i.e. to protest, peacefully, at his visit.
Julian, Salisbury UK Maybe Bush's visit to the UK will allow British people to help him realise that their way of thinking is correct, if indeed a difference in opinion exists and if the British people have the confidence to coherently form and argue a case. There are more options than just apathy or confrontation. Maybe a figurehead is needed to vehiculate opinions, but if one can't be found that people are prepared to follow en masse then it may mean that Bush should be followed, n'est pas?
Jeremy, Vientiane, Lao PDR
Let us not confuse the United States, which as a country and a people is a friend and an ally indeed. Most people, however, object to Bush, not to the US. What keeps on baffling me though is why Tony Blair for whom I had a lot of respect, ever teamed up with such a guy! As for Bush's visit to Britain, I think it is clear that Bush is unwelcome in practically every country in the world.
Alain Hernu, Andresy, France
Surely this is just a publicity stunt to get Mr. Bush some nice footage for his re-election campaign next year. This man is being given the keys to the city of London, a city where its citizens won't be allowed to express their displeasure at his arrival and will be swept away from the eyes of Mr. Bush and his media bandwagon. I'm sorry, considering the nations general feelings regarding the war, this visit seems in incredibly bad taste...
Nik Hewitt, UK
| A state visit is one thing, a massive insult to the host nation is quite another |
If George Bush wishes to accept Blair's invitation and come to the UK for a state visit, I personally have no problem with that. However we are a free, democratic society and therefore there should be no 'no go areas' in London, other than those recognised and acknowledged by all as such. Peaceful demonstration is a right. I see no need for a massive American security presence. Scotland Yard and our other agencies should be more than capable of handling the task. A state visit is one thing, a massive insult to the host nation is quite another.
Terry, England I fervently hope that all this sudden interest in demonstration is the beginnings of a re-interest in democracy, but please don't let it be the end of it. Currently only 50% of people eligible to vote actually do so. Take this new found voice and vote, harass your MP, push out all the political dinosaurs who have been sat in office contributing nothing for all these years. Get involved at the local level, get control back. Unfortunately this will require a little more thought that chanting a simple slogan like "Stop Bush" but will have to be more effective as the politicians will have to listen to you before they make the decisions not after, when to be fair it's too late. We can't leave Iraq now, we have to finish what was started, so this demonstration really is nothing more that crying over spilt milk - not really any point to that is there?
Paul, UK
The US is one of our greatest allies but Bush can hardly be described as one of the greatest US presidents. Why is this man being accorded a state reception and at this time?
John M, UK
And what would be the purpose of this visit, exactly? To celebrate the greatest blunders in recent history! If that's the case, than by all means he should visit London. Poor George, there is no country in the world where he is welcomed. When your nearest friend doesn't like you, we can guess what everyone else thinks.
Ferik Ferizaj, USA
If George Bush doesn't come here, how will he ever have any appreciation of how people in other countries really feel about him - I'm sure US TV doesn't say much about it. Having said that it won't change anything will it? It's not as if he can make an about-face on anything now is it? Protest all you want - it's your right, just don't expect George W to take much notice.
Ian Thurston, UK
I don't understand why so many comments always have to be either "black" or "white". A little perspective would be welcome here. Whether you agree with Bush or not (I don't) he is still a leader of a friendly country, and in that regard has the fullest right to come to the UK for a state visit (or anywhere else). On the other hand, if there are protests, they should not be banned. This is the way freedom works... the right to disagree, even if you in general have no problems with that person/country.
Ruud, Netherlands
Peaceful protests often turn ugly here, so I am unsurprised at the wish to quash it. Both these guys are doing their best - if their best isn't good enough we get to vote them out (roll on next election!), but until then we have made out beds and will have to lie in it.
Jesse, UK
Jesse, UK - What peaceful protest (especially against the illegal war) here in the UK has 'turned ugly'? I have been on two and the crowd was vocal, sure, but there was virtually no trouble. As for your comforting suggestion to wait for an election to get rid of Bush/Blair, remember Bush wasn't elected fairly in the first place - we'd better hope Blair will not copy his big friend's techniques in this respect. Meanwhile I prefer to exercise ALL my democratic rights, including that of public protest.
Diana, London, UK
I think perhaps the same respect the Brits showed for David Blane's recent antics should and will be shown to Mr Bush. I suggest we put him in a glass box and hang him off a crane for a month. That would bring a smile to the face of the world.
Simon, UK
Absolutely NO!- And being invited to stay at Buckingham Palace during his stay ABSOLUTE OUTRAGEOUS! - Bush should stay at home and try and use that little brain he might have to think about the damage his actions are doing to the world right now.
Fritz Hartz., Denmark.
| Mr Bush is more than welcome to visit the UK |
Mr Bush is more than welcome to visit the UK and deserves a lot more respect than he is going to receive. Welcome to the UK Mr President.
Terry, UK This is just another publicity stunt in attempt to mislead the American masses that he hasn't completely ruined communications with our allies and that they will help us to rebuild countries that we (our politicians) have destroyed. I just hope that the American news will at least acknowledge the protests.
Tamie, USA
Mr Bush is to be our guest, so if he wants to come then it should be our security services making the arrangements. I have no problem with Mr Bush visiting the UK, but we mustn't let the authorities get away with 'hiding' the protesters. After all, isn't the war on terror concerned with preserving democracy and free speech that the US administration apparently cherishes?
Paul, UK
I will not be protesting, but I am against him coming to Britain this week because he will be preaching his religious propaganda about how it was right that Britain went to war with the USA against Iraq, when no weapons of mass destruction have not been found yet.
Joanne Edwards, Brighton, UK
Of course George Bush should be entitled to a State visit. Those who protest are entitled to do so, but should do so with dignity and should still respect the fact that a foreign Head of State will be present within the country.
Bradley Thomas, UK
| We need to retain some perspective here |
This visit was probably put in the diary years ago - long before the war in Iraq. We need to retain some perspective here, and remember that just because some of us disagree with the war, there is still a huge amount that binds the UK and USA together. We should remember this when Dubya (who I personally hold no brief for) arrives here.
John, England I will be attending a protest in Edinburgh. I would recommend a general strike if protests are suppressed in London. No more blood for oil.
Max Oakes, UK
Surely the 'freedom' to gather to express one's political views is one of the 'freedoms' 'loved' by Mr Bush's much-vaunted 'freedom -loving people'?
Thomas Vaughan, UK
As an American who lived in England for 2 years, I can advise President Bush not to waste his time coming to the UK. The Brits are whinging, ungrateful, hypercritical, and usually drunk. While Tony Blair is a man of great courage and honour, his unpopularity at home only underscores the fact that the modern Brits have no understanding of those qualities. We in the US thank Mr Blair and the members of the UK military forces for standing with us in Iraq. However, if President Bush wants to see a crumbling, dysfunctional country he can stay closer to home and visit Mexico.
Keith, USA
If Keith from the USA doesn't like our "crumbling, dysfunctional" country he can always go back and join the debate on whether US high school teachers need to carry guns. At least we count votes in our country Keith.
Andy S, UK
To Keith in the US: If Bush wants to see a "crumbling dysfunctional country" he needn't go as far as Mexico - he could just stay in the USA. After all, with his suspension of civil liberties at home and his cowboy antics on the world stage, he seems to be leading the once great republic into a phase of imperial decadence and decline.
Tom, Canadian in Mexico
The level to which Blair and Bush believe in "free speech" will be indirectly proportional to the distance between them and the protestors. I predict this distance to be enormous.
JS, UK
| Of course protest - but not just because of Iraq |
Of course protest - but not just because of Iraq. His family fixed the presidential vote; he has turned his back on the UN, the environment and human rights. There are so many reasons why he should have been fully investigated and impeached by now I've lost count. The protest should be about a corrupt republican administration and manipulation of the global economy through the World Bank, IMF and World Trade Organisation.
Dave Iliffe, UK If I will be protesting it will be against the protesters. I'm sick of the do gooding left, welcome Mr President we are glad to be your allies and well done in this fight against terrorism.
Mike, England
I can't believe that we are prepared to waste �4m, disrupt a large part of London (which will surely cost us a lot more), take a lot of police away from their general duties, and all so Bush can visit? Can't they use videoconferencing?
Dan F, UK
Why don't we ask this question to the entire British public and therefore practice democracy for once! After all, it's what we're trying setup in other countries, we may as well perfect it here first!!
Andrew, Sheffield
| Personally I hope there are massive demonstrations and his visit ends in farce |
The damage that Bush and Blair have done is unforgivable. It seems the only reason why he is coming to the UK is as an ego massage for himself and an attempt to show the American people that he is a 'popular' president. Personally I hope there are massive demonstrations and his visit ends in farce.
Nev, UK I want to know if there's a 'pro-Bush' demonstration - I for one would be front of the line!
Jo, UK
I'll be protesting from afar. He'll quickly learn that the British public aren't quite as gullible as our American cousins. I won't support the US war in Iraq, and no amount of his own specific brand of poetic 'gobbledegook' is going to change that. There. Saved him a wasted journey.
Dave, UK
I think that all of these anti American comments are embarrassing. Hey if you do not like the man - protest by all means. Just remember that you have the right to that in this country and in the US. Countries like Iraq and Afghanistan did not have that until a few months ago!
James, London, UK
How depressingly ironic. The self-proclaimed champion of world freedom comes to the capital city of his "greatest allies" and closes off the centre of town in order to deny people who are not even his own citizens the right to peaceful protest. What next? A Republican Guard-style intelligence agency? Rigged elections? Hereditary succession? Wait a second - this has all already happened...
Tom, UK
Why shouldn't Mr Bush be entitled to a state visit? We allow Gerry Adams with his links to the IRA in our houses of parliament and there is no protest by the 'anti war' lobby over that is there!? No, as always it comes down to plain old anti-Americanism and even if it had been Al Gore coming to London, there'd still be protests, he represents America, Globalisation, etc etc. So yes, he should be allowed to visit, as America is a close ally of ours unlike certain countries just over the British channel!
Alex, UK
| The supporters of a total anti-Americanism are as narrow-minded as their ridiculous "Freedom Fries" US counter-parts |
The problem seems to be that some people assume that if you are anti-Bush, you are anti-American in general, and pro-Saddam. I'm sure there are many Americans who despise Bush as much as many of us here do. The supporters of a total anti-Americanism are as narrow-minded as their ridiculous "Freedom Fries" US counter-parts. It's perfectly possible to be anti-Bush, and against the cruel dictatorship in Iraq at the same time. What we wanted was not to be fed lies from both governments about their real motives. If their reasons for war had been genuine, and if they were rebuilding Iraq (and Afghanistan) properly, then there would not be so many protests and anti-war feeling.
Isabelle, UK Although I feel that it was the right thing to do to topple Saddam Hussein I do not believe a war was necessary to do this, I also refuse to rally around Bush and Blair when their armies are responsible for a lot of the mess in Iraq, for example not guarding the hospitals in the aftermath.
A A C Hunter (Liberal Left-Wing Do-Gooder), UK
"Metropolitan Police are planning a �4m security operation for bush..." pardon my French, but is he not a millionaire? I, as a teacher, earn a pittance compared to him, yet I am expected (without my permission) to have my taxes pay for his luxury stay! Great democracy him and Blair are fighting for!!!
Bob, Manchester
| What is wrong with President Bush visiting here for goodness sake? |
What is wrong with President Bush visiting here for goodness sake? Bush and Blair did what they felt was right over the Iraq war. Sept 11th made me, and all my family, realise that these fanatical terrorists could eventually kill us all. We pay our taxes to help the armed forces protect us. Come over Mr Bush and have a jolly good time while you are here I say!
Zoe, England Mr. Bush and his administration are really doing a great deal of damage to world peace and stability. The �4m to be spent on Bush's security should be spent on Iraq or on eliminating poverty instead. I'm sure the British taxpayers would have preferred this instead.
Rakesh, India
Does he know how to find your country on the map?
Jules, Switzerland
Thanks Bush/Blair for seeing evil and doing something against it. The thousands of British lining the streets to demonstrate are the ones with bloods on their hands. We are glad the Americans are here. Please stop demonstrating in our name. WE DO NOT WANT IT!!!. God bless America.
Hammid Laziz, Iraq
Hammid Laziz, Iraq: Please stop thinking you represent millions of people of Iraq.
Sudra, India
Hammid Laziz, Iraq - Not everything that happens in the world has to do with Iraq. The protests are about other things too like the environment, civil rights abuse, hypocrisy, damage to religious harmony, and election rigging amongst a list that could fill this web page!
Paul, UK
Looks like the average IQ in the UK is going to decrease temporarily next week.
Nick, UK
Yes, let's applaud Bush for all the work he has done for the environment like......oh wait, he's the one helping to destroy it and bring the threat of the ice caps melting ever closer. Of course, I expect him to drive around in a motorcade spewing many fumes into the atmosphere because "we all should do our bit for the environment!"
Mark Roberts, Cambridge, England
| I do not agree with the Americans demanding that we close London for him |
I think President Bush has every right to visit the UK if he so wishes, but I do not agree with the Americans demanding that we close London for him. Surely the President can cope with a little bit of public exposure, and not waste our money for no good reason. If he is that worried that he will be attacked he wouldn't be coming over in the first place.
Joy, UK Why protest, who in the government cares anyway?
Joe, UK
There's only one person in this country who wants "President" Bush here, and that's Tony Blair. I'm not listening to any exclusion zones, in fact I'm going to make a point of disregarding them. "President" Bush is not interrupting my life, considering how much damage he's done to the world.
Thomas Yasin, UK
Yes the USA is a close friend and ally. It is meant to be only your closest friend who can tell you that you smell. Maybe Blair will be a close enough friend to tell him that some of his policies stink.
Keith Walker, UK
Please protest peacefully in great numbers. We in the US are kept so far away from the president that all he sees are hand picked cheering insiders at $5000 per plate dinners. Please speak for US.
Susan, US
| We are not anti American - just anti Bush! |
I hope and pray that the million or so who turned out to oppose the war will turn out to show Bush & Blair exactly what we think of them - we are not anti American - just anti Bush!
Dave Elliot, UK Inviting bush to the UK is also an invitation for terrorism. It is just a matter of time before London blood will be spilt. When will Tony Blair stop risking British lives both in and out of the UK, and realise that his priorities belong to the British, not to George Bush, Iraq, or his ego ?
James, UK
What a complete waste of a very large sum of taxpayers money, surely this could be put to better use in rebuilding Iraq or Afghanistan or indeed for many other needs within Britain rather than security for a so-called "President"?
Pam, Belgium
He most certainly should be allowed to visit, I think he is a fine President. You will not find me protesting. I applaud Mr Bush and Mr Blair for standing up against evil and I also wish President Bush victory in 2004 election.
Nikii, UK
I think George Bush should go to UK and stay there. I hope the protests are strong and loud.
Roberta Stabel, USA
He has the same right as any law abiding person to visit this country.
Ernest Harrison, England
Ernest Harrison: Of course any law-abiding citizen should be allowed to visit the country. It's just a shame that Mr Bush has chosen to ignore so many US and international laws over the course of his presidency.
Matt, England
He's as welcome as the plague. The damage he's doing to world will take generations to fix. The damage he and his government's actions are doing to Anglo-American relations is unforgivable.
Steve, UK
| Personally I support Blair and Bush but if I didn't, I could think of better things to do that walk around London protesting |
I have no problem with Bush visiting us. I also have no problem with demonstrations. All I hope is that these protestors get their message across in a civilised manner and don't embarrass the country. Personally I support Blair and Bush but if I didn't, I could think of better things to do that walk around London protesting. Don't tell me you think these demonstrations are actually going to change anything.
Rob, England To all Britons: Do not let what has happened here in the USA happen on the streets of London. Demand your rights to assemble and speak out without being vilified by a power hungry right wing agenda. And know that many, many Americans are opposed to this war and are angry. PS I wish I could be there to march with you all!
Bob, Washington DC, USA
It would have been better for both Blair and Bush if Bush had visited countries like Somalia, Burma, Iran, Belarus or simply stayed home in Texas but neither him or his advisors have a clue where he is welcome outside US or where he could contribute positively.
Istvan Hunanui, Moldova
When are the liberal, left wing do-gooders going to stop moaning about President Bush? They only hate him because he is right-wing and treats criminals harshly and topples very dangerous tyrants like Saddam Hussein. We should be cheering him when he arrives not protesting.
Iain Jamieson, Scotland
Bush is an embarrassment to human kind and an insult to human intelligence, so no I don't want him here. There isn't more to say about the war in Iraq - anyone with a bit of common sense knows that it wasn't justified and that the USA acting as liberators is nothing but a smokescreen intending to pathetically disguise a government's incompetence to deal with key home and foreign issues. The only outcome I've witnessed so far is more hatred and chaos. For those in doubts, please switch on your TV.
Lana, UK
Yes, but unlike the Chinese state visit his state visit should not stop people being able to stage peaceful protests even if it is embarrassing to the "establishment". After all Mr Blair keeps reminding the world how democratic GB is.
Paul, England
Rather than protesting about a visit from the president of our closest ally, why don't these people go and help dig up some of the mass graves that Saddam left in Iraq?
Anthony Jones, UK
| If the police are forced to stop demonstrators we will know that we are living in a police state and that democracy is dead |
We are entitled to invite Bush, as President of the USA, on a state visit. However, by the same token, UK citizens are entitled to protest and they are entitled to protest outside Parliament, the democratic seat of government. If the police are forced to stop demonstrators from doing this, then we will know that we are living in a police state and that democracy is dead.
Val, UK If the UK could give Robert Mugabe a state visit then surely George Bush qualifies.
Martin, Zimbabwe
Yes, Mr Bush should be invited to a state visit to the UK. This way both Bush and Blair will see how much they are disliked because of their illegal war on Iraq and the continuing illegal occupation of Iraq. I will be there to protest along with many, many tens of thousands.
Lee, London, UK
Yes of course he should be welcomed. America is our ally and probably always will be. Those that did not agree with the Iraq war should look at public opinion in that country. 70% feel they have been liberated from a tyrant. I speak probably for the silent majority of people who are not on the extreme fringes of politics.
Peter Stanford, Scotland
To call this visit insensitive would be putting it mildly! For Blair to foist such a charade as a full state visit on the people of this country, given the events of the last few months, is repulsive.
Anne F, UK
Doesn't he have anything better to do? His visit only increases the likelihood of a terrorist attack in London. Thanks Dubya!
Jack, UK
America is this countries greatest ally and those protesting should perhaps remember that is it were not for America they would not have the opportunity to protest at all. But as we do then yes they are quite correct to air their viewpoint on Iraq. It should though be remembered that this visit is also about international trade, security and healing the wounds between Europe and the US. I am sure though that one of the no brigade will be able to produce a list of PC leaders who can come to this country.
Stephen Thomson, UK
NO WAY! At least David Blaine was vaguely interesting!
Amanda, England
The first official state visit for fifty years...Why couldn't they wait a further fifty, then I would not have to witness such an unwelcome president. No I will not protest in person but I admire and support those who will. Stay away Dubya!
Tim Mcmahon, Pennar / Wales As a Brit living in the States I am ashamed and annoyed at the people back home being so anti American and anti Bush. Our closest allies and they are treated with such disrespect.
Paul Campion, USA
To Paul Campion, as one Brit in America to another - I'm proud, especially on November 11th, that people in my homeland still have the courage to exercise the freedoms that so many fought for and that Bush and his cronies merely pay lip service to. I welcome Bush's trip to London and hope that the protests are long and loud and that he begins to appreciate just how much he has damaged the image of country he represents. In America protest is now suppressed to the degree that even a TV drama about a Republican president cannot be tolerated by the Right Wing extremists.
Rob, USA
I am tired of hearing that we should stop protesting about the war and now concentrate on building the peace. Where is the justice in that? International law has been broken and innocent people have been killed. If we follow this line of thought, we should release all murderers from our jails since that's 'in the past' and concentrate on making honest citizens out of them!
Shilen Morjaria, London, UK
I am very upset that this person is to have a state visit to UK. I cannot believe that my taxes are going to pay for this, or that Mr Blair feels that this 'person' will be welcome! I hope to be at the demonstration and I hope that as many people are there as were in the demonstrations against the war.
Lynda Randall, England
This is political suicide on Blair's part and I therefore support the visit wholeheartedly.
Lorraine, UK
I understand that George W Bush had never been abroad before he was elected to the most powerful political position on Earth: therefore I think he should visit as many countries in the world asap. I shall be protesting - my only problem is exactly how to express what I feel on one placard.
Kate Martinson, UK
| You certainly can disagree with President Bush, but remember the honour accorded your Prime Minister Blair when he visited the US |
You certainly can disagree with President Bush, but remember the honour accorded your Prime Minister Blair when he visited the US: he addressed a Joint Session of Congress. Few foreign leaders ever get to do that. The US President typically only does that once a year. So, presiding over our entire Congress is a rare event. Perhaps, merely out of politeness, you should remember that. Bush has always given Mr. Blair great courtesy, and as I pointed out above, a place of honour, when he has visited America. Therefore, accord President Bush the respect he deserves if he visits your country.
Jeff, Texas, USA Why shouldn't the president of the United States visit the 51st state?
Pascal Jacquemain, UK (French)
We should postpone the visit until Arnold Schwarzenegger is made president of the USA and then have the state visit. The British public will be able to look on with glee as Arnie is interviewed by the queen rather than Denise Van Outen on the Big Breakfast bed. Oh I can't wait......
Bob, UK
I am sick and tired of all these protesters, whinging about Bush & Blair and how unfair the war was. How fair was it the Saddam ruled Iraq through fear, how fair was it that if you spoke against Saddam you could be killed. I applaud Bush & Blair for finally not putting up for this kind of dictatorship any more.
Tony, UK
It's pretty rich of Bush and Blair to call for us to rally round and rebuild Iraq, forget our differences for the sake of the Iraqi people, etc. when the US continues to refuse the allow the international community (in the form of the UN) any real say in the future of the country.
Oliver, UK
Of course President Bush should come and visit his newest state. It will give Governor Blair an opportunity to show President Bush how progressively American this former sovereign state is becoming. He can take him to McDonalds, Wal-Mart, and then up north to see a few US Ghost ships.
Chris, Canadian in the UK We should welcome Bush here as the close UK-USA relationship is essential in the international arena today.
Doug, UK
Absolutely I will be protesting! Blair should have rejected Bush from the very beginning and told him "please don't come, now or ever" because Bush is making things even more difficult for Blair. We (Labour) are going to pay a very big price for this "affair" between Blair and Bush. But I will definitely protest because I am against everything Bush is for.
Ralph, London, UK
Bush should be allowed to visit the UK, but not hide behind the so-called shroud of security and be hidden from protestors. Reminiscent of the Chinese Premier's visit a few years ago, when Blair's government prevented protestors from exercising their democratic right (much as they do in Communist China!)Ironic how Bush, allegedly at the opposite end of the political spectrum & representing freedom, democracy etc will enjoy the same treatment as his Communist dictator counterpart.
Nick, UK
| Mr Bush should visit the UK and he should, of course, expect vocal demonstrations |
Of course Mr Bush should visit the UK and he should, of course, expect vocal demonstrations for the duration of his stay. I believe this is something to do with social and political freedom? Practice what you preach.
Jamie Tweddell, England I was particularly impressed to hear Ken Livingstone emphasising people's right to protest freely. Unlike last week, when he was condemning the "spiderman" protest. Does he only want protests in agreement with him?
Sven, UK
As an American, I feel compelled to say that he shouldn't visit. One of the things I was looking forward to during my lengthy stay here was avoiding Bush and his horrible handling of his presidency. I almost feel like he's following me.
To the British: Whatever you do, don't listen to him!
Brandon J. Ray, from USA
Doesn't it seem a little ironic that after fighting a war to prevent Saddam from assisting Al Queda, no sorry, removing weapons of mass destruction, oops, returning democracy to Iraq, we are preparing to prevent a march that embodies the whole point of democracy?
Chris, UK
I'm more concerned with the way the Americans are being allowed to take control of security procedures here. I think it's vital we keep a sense of perspective and show the US that while in our country, they are guests and our own security forces are just as (if not more) efficient.
Russ, Wales
Everywhere American presidents go they bring trouble to the streets with their heavy-handed arrogance. No streets should be closed for President Bush, and no foreign agents should be allowed to carry firearms on British soil. The American state should learn some humility, then it might earn some respect in the world.
Duncan Campbell, UK
We should welcome President Bush, however all these extra measures to protect seem extreme. Closure of parts of London cannot be justified. The security measures already in place around the Queen should be more then adequate. Cliff, England
Yes, but I think he should have to see the true opinion of the British people about his war, rather than being flown in on a secret visit and kept away from protesters.
Colin Wright, UK
No, I won't be protesting. The people who have joined the deluded, left wing, anti-American bandwagon will, of course protest, as is their right. We didn't see any of them protesting at Saddam's human right abuses though, did we?
Patrick Milne, UK
How does Patrick Milne know who has or hasn't protested against both Saddam and the war? You can be against a regime but oppose the means used to over throw him surely? As for Bush being our closest ally. Is this the same Bush that has cost UK industry �200million in lost trade over the past 18 months with his dodgy trade fixing over steel? British companies and British jobs will have suffered because what our 'friend' has done. Although by all accounts his meddling as cost nearly 25,000 American jobs as well.
Phil, UK
Why is he coming? He and Blair seem to have a closer relationship than any president and PM before (maybe even closer than Reagan and Thatcher). How could it improve relations, given that Blair goes along with whatever Bush says? Will it give Blair more influence over Bush or just allow Dubya to include footage of tea with the queen in his re-election TV ads? Shame on you, Mr Blair.
Chris, UK Of course he should have a state visit, he is after all a head of state. As for protests , ts a free country unlike Iraq was a short time ago.
Chris Vinton-Horsley, England
I most certainly will be protesting against George W Bush. So will thousands of others. Blair needs to be given an unequivocal message that the people of this country do not expect their Prime Minister to be a lapdog to an ultra rightwing US President.
Nick Toye, UK
Absolutely no way! What on earth was Blair thinking of? There is bound to be massive protests causing great disruption and embarrassment, and it will bring the dubious nature of the Iraq war to the fore once again. It should have been discreetly postpones, and re-arranged once America elects a less odious President.
John C, Bath, England
Bush can stay at home, and the proposed security bill (four million of payers money) can be put towards the huge cost of rebuilding Iraq.
Laura, England
Firstly, I think it's a bit rich that Tony Blair wants us to forget about the war in Iraq, when we didn't want it anyway. And we certainly won't forget how he lied to us and joined up with the most conservative "president" the US has seen in years. Plus, for some reason it makes me want to vomit when I think of Dubya having tea and cakes with the Queen. Listen, if Tony Blair wants to go to his bestest mate George's house in the middle of knowhere Texas, that's fine. But Bush shouldn't be able to come here and disrupt the whole of London - it's our city, not his.
Molly Bennett, UK
As President, it is only right that Bush should visit Britain, as previous President's have in the past. However, even an idiot must be aware that there is a strong feeling about the war in Iraq, for which he must shoulder much of the responsibility. We live in a democracy, and thus have the right to make our feelings on such an important issue clear. Personally I won't be joining in the protests, but I hope those that do so do not spoil things by letting things get out of control.
Dave Godfrey, Swindon
| America is our closest ally. We have strong historical, trading, cultural and political links with that country |
I think it's great that President Bush will be visiting the UK next week. America is our closest ally. We have strong historical/trading/cultural/political links with that country. Why should we not honour their President? I believe he and Prime Minister Blair were right to topple Saddam Hussein and I support them wholeheartedly in the rebuilding of a new and democratic Iraq.
Ashleigh, UK There does not seem much point in protesting over the state visit of George W. Bush. Anyone who has seen his inarticulate verbal stumblings and stuttering struggles over autocues must realise that he does not possess the intelligence to formulate a shopping list, let alone a coherent foreign policy. Dig a little deeper to see the usual suspects who have financial interests in the "reconstruction" of Afghanistan and Iraq, to see who is really running America.
Phil , UK
One-Minute World News 
News services
E-mail this to a friend 
Printable version 
