| You are in: Talking Point | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Monday, 10 February, 2003, 12:10 GMT Are our schools good enough? ![]() A quarter of school lessons observed by inspectors were only "satisfactory" - which might no longer be good enough, Ofsted chief David Bell says in his annual report. Teacher shortages and truancy and bad behaviour by pupils still plague many of the tougher schools. But there is good news as well. More pupils than ever are benefiting from improvements in school standards. Teaching has improved as well as the quality of leadership in the schools. But is satisfactory good enough? Can you see the improvements? Tell us your views. Thank you for your e-mails. This debate is now closed. A selection of your comments is published below.
Carrie, UK There are comparatively few bad teachers and even fewer bad heads. Instead of filling in report after report and bid after bid we should remember the simple fact that we employ teachers to teach and heads to manage schools. I am on an LEA select committee, we have to scrutinise 38 reports each year for the government. Some reports cost more to prepare in a small LEA than we spend on the service. In total these reports cost enough to run whole schools and fewer have any value.
David Priddy, UK In my job I see so many families who think education is unimportant, therefore it doesn't matter if their kids bunk off, don't work, cause trouble, etc. And they simply laugh at letters from the school about all these. It's true not every family can provide their children with private tuition or computers or whatever, but providing encouragement and discipline doesn't cost money!
Kevin, England Our state schools will never be good enough until we can convincingly believe that all children are receiving equal, high quality opportunities to realise their potential wherever they live and from whatever stratum of society they come. It is quite reasonable to examine schools and teachers who are responsible for a very expensive and compulsory activity that affects the whole population. However, they cannot be held responsible for an overall structure which evolves to defeat objectives of equal opportunity and high expectations for all the nation's children. My work with a major company involves links with education. I'm afraid I drew the line at being asked to give money (sponsorship) to non-attendees to encourage them to come into school and take their GCSEs. When I raised my concerns about the message this would give to the pupils who did attend and were not absent the discussion ended!
Mike, England Children should have elementary skills in reading, writing and counting before they get to school. These lessons should come from their parents and family. Don't blame the teachers for the failings of the families. Our Education system, one of the finest during the first half of the 20th century, lets our children down. The teachers' hands are tied because of "political correctness" a phrase of which I am heartily sick of. We have an education system which seems to leave children in charge.
Mike, UK I am fed up with the education system. If we hadn't moved from Kent my boys would have achieved much higher grades than they will get now. Their school has 1,300 pupils between 13 and 18. It is the only school in the area and in his GCSE year my son has about 1 hour's homework a week!!!! There are good teachers at the school but their expectations of pupils' achievement are too low. As someone who has recruited school and college leavers in the past year, it is painfully obvious that our schools are not good enough. The quality of those leaving is just awful, and the failings are in the very basic areas of not being able to write coherently or understand basic maths and science issues.
She was disappointed but accepted that this was not her finest hour in the classroom, and this is the point: Ofsted will witness maybe three hours of teaching per teacher in five years, and those three hours will be the most stressful because somebody at the back of the room is looking to find fault. Does Ofsted really expect to find representative teaching under these conditions? It winds me up when I keep hearing about the lack of teachers. I've recently responded to the government's drive to recruit more teachers to primary education: 10 years experience in the real world, well skilled, excited by the prospect, yet all the PGCE courses within 50 miles are full. I'm waiting... call me!!!
Sandi Lieber, UK/USA I'm 16 and have just started an apprenticeship since leaving school last year. I personally found my GCSEs a breeze but a lot of people struggled. Teachers push you non-stop and never ease up on pressurising you. People go into exams so nervous they just can't perform, I personally took it easy and I did great! No wonder teachers are quitting or developing depression and severe stress. Classroom sizes are far too big! As is usual in all things to do with education, these figures will have been fixed as well and we can expect them to rise (either by grade inflation or by lowering of standards) year on year regardless of what standards actually are. This report is too quick to condemn - my school definitely learnt me proper!
Darek, UK How well our schools are performing has become impossible to determine, since the emergence of examination pass-rates as the principal objective. Exams have become obviously easier, grades have been eroded and exam technique has become one of the most important skills in the curriculum. Pass rates and grades have soared almost ludicrously, but it is not surprising that for employers such attainments count for less and less. The government needs to turn this situation around by establishing and maintaining truly definable national standards for examiners to follow, including much more continual assessment and less formal examination.
With another teacher we'd look forward to the inspections, because we knew it was the only lesson of the year when she would actually teach us, rather than tell us to copy out of the text book. The schools are given too much warning of the inspections. Why don't they turn up unannounced and get a true picture of what's wrong with the schools? That way they'd know what they need to fix. But what does the word "satisfactory" mean with respect to the quality of teaching? To me it would imply that the teaching provided is fit for the purpose for which it is intended. If not, then the terminology is wrong. I find the continued existence of "satisfactory" teaching reassuring, as it tells us standards are not being racked up to be meaningless, as has happened with the so-called "Research Assessment Exercise" in the universities. The time to be discontent is when you see reports of a very high percentage of "excellent" teaching. This would mean one of two things: firstly that the schools had sussed out the system, or secondly that the system wasn't being applied rigorously. I am currently studying for my A-levels and will hopefully be starting at university later this year. Satisfactory is certainly not good enough if you are a pupil. As a student I aspire to get the best grades I can possibly achieve, which requires productive lessons. My school is due to be visited by Ofsted next week and I have been disturbed by the huge amount of pretence that goes into the preparation for the inspection. Ofsted will not view the school as it is, meaning improvements are less likely to be made. In 1998 our school after an Ofsted inspection was put into special measures. In 2000 HMI took us out of special measures saying we were good. In 2001 the LEA looked at the school and said they were happy. In 2000 Ofsted inspected again, said there had been little improvement and want to put us back in special measures. All this is at best confusing for parents and disheartening for staff who worked their socks off to improve the achievements of the pupils. Until David Bell achieves consistency in his own department he can't really question if satisfactory is good enough If "satisfactory" isn't good enough, then it isn't satisfactory, is it?
Paul, UK One person teaching 40 kids. No ability to discipline the 'disruptive' kids. Huge sections of curriculum removed from GCSE subjects effectively dumbing them down. I wouldn't call that satisfactory, never mind good enough! We've had 10 years of decline (at least!) coinciding with 10 years of 'improvements'. Maybe taking things back that far will improve standards to a satisfactory level. From having contract teachers teaching compulsory subjects that they haven't been trained in to 80% of black boys in London schools leaving without any qualifications, the schools are not good enough. If that's not a crisis on a massive scale, I don't know what is. But let's not blame teachers, they don't have any power with disruptive students, the pay is not enough to entice or keep anyone decent, and they can't move for paper work. I think Tony's mantra should be changed to "war, war, war"...! I spent half of my schooling (in the mid-90s) twiddling my thumbs waiting for classmates to catch up as I had finished the hours lesson in 20 minutes. Start stretching the pupils, particularly the more able, and standards may start to improve. Labour is so keen to bring everyone to a certain mediocre level that they disregard the bright children they are actually pulling down.
Luckily I have parents that have pushed me to do better than they did and gave me a sense of self worth and respect for others. Unfortunately a lot of kids these days don't get that. So I don't think it's necessarily right to blame the schools. The education is there for the taking if you want it. Teachers can only do so much. Parents contribute to the "success" of their children in providing the right environment at home. There is also, possibly, too great an emphasis placed on academic achievement which will always be out of reach to a sizable minority. Finding the areas of potential excellence for these children is a major challenge to the whole of our society. I have just pulled my 8-year-old out of a quality marked middle class village school as the standard of teaching of basic maths skills left this bright boy unable to use basic + - x, etc. The school stated that the numeracy hour focused on problem solving and not on the development of these basic skills. How do you solve problems without them??? He is now thriving at a private prep school teaching basic skills in the traditional way. His progress in three weeks is outstanding. Why do we subject our children to new trendy approaches like guinea pigs? Stick to what works. We are failing our children with the current system. If we can get over 50% through the system and into university, it can't be all bad.
Geoff, UK Our schools are nowhere near good enough. They would be if teachers were left alone to do their jobs and discipline was restored to the classroom. I think that the standards in schools are deteriorating. I'm the youngest of six children, and some of the topics I learnt for maths A-level, my brothers did for O-level. This is a bit of a sweeping statement and I acknowledge it's not true for all topics in all subjects (but it is for most). The government (past and present) have a bee in the bonnet about raising standards for all children, but the only way to measure this is by exam results. Unfortunately this has led to exams getting easier. How can the intelligence of the population as a whole increase across the board every year? I just don't buy it. | See also: 05 Feb 03 | Education Internet links: The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top Talking Point stories now: Links to more Talking Point stories are at the foot of the page. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more Talking Point stories |
![]() | ||
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> | To BBC World Service>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |