I just do not believe whoever blamed our prince Dipendra for killing his parents and other royal members. He can do anything but not this

E-mail sent by Samasti from Nepal

A palace official, speaking to the BBC, denied press reports that the new king of Nepal, Dipendra, had shot dead most of his own family and turned his gun on himself after an argument about his choice of bride.

The official said the death of the late King Birendra, his wife Queen Aishwarya and at least four other close relatives had been the result of an accident.

The BBC's Daniel Lak, in Kathmandu, says many analysts and members of the middle class elite still feel that early reports of the new king's involvement in the killings could be true.

Official statement

An official statement released on Sunday said only that King Birendra and the others died when an automatic weapon was suddenly discharged inside the royal palace in Kathmandu.

Many Nepalese find it hard to believe what has happened

There was no reference to who was holding the weapon when it went off.

It said the new king and former Crown Prince Dipendra had been gravely wounded.

He is now in hospital in a coma with a bullet wound to his head, but has nonetheless been named king in keeping with Nepal's constitution.

Prince Gyanendra, his uncle, has been appointed regent.

Grief and disbelief

Grief and anger over the killings spilled out into the streets on Sunday.

Mourners had spent the day in largely peaceful expressions of grief, but about 50 young men burned newspapers in the main shopping district and chanted slogans against the press for daring to suggest that the new king might be guilty of murder.

There have been largely peaceful expressions of grief

BBC News Online has received many e-mails expressing grief and disbelief.

"I just do not believe whoever blamed our prince Dipendra for killing his parents and other royal members. He can do anything but not this," said one from Nepal.

The BBC's Daniel Lak, in Kathmandu, says the authorities are in a constitutional bind.

If they confirm that the new King was the man behind the massacre, he says, the constitutional implications for both the monarchy and the country are dire.