|
 |
 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
| | You are in: Sci/Tech | ||||||||||||||||||
 | | Tuesday, 31 July, 2001, 15:24 GMT 16:24 UK Wetlands 'can lessen flood threat'  Towns could gain if countryside was used to cope with floods By BBC News Online's environment correspondent Alex Kirby A leading UK conservation group says wetlands should be used to provide protection against flooding. It says they could not only absorb excess water, but also serve as reservoirs during droughts. There could also be big gains for wildlife and a new source of income for farmers. The idea is part of a plan urging the government to be far more ambitious about restoring wildlife to the British countryside. It comes from the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), in a report entitled Futurescapes. Timely report The report says an area larger than greater London could be returned to people and wildlife by 2020, provided government targets for habitat restoration are "dramatically revised". Species that would benefit include the black grouse, pine marten, avocet, sand lizard and bittern. The RSPB wants to see 10 times more open downland, a fivefold increase in the planned restoration of lowland woodlands and heathlands, and twice as many reedbeds, wet meadows and upland heaths. Grahame Madge of the RSPB told BBC News Online: "We'd begun work on Futurescapes before the foot-and-mouth outbreak, but it is timely. Too many sheep "The disease provides an ideal opportunity to pick up the pieces and have a new look at how we manage the countryside.
"With wetlands, we believe they can provide much greater community benefits than simply as a wildlife habitat. "We've reached a fairly broad consensus with the National Farmers' Union on how you could use them as buffers to protect towns against flooding. "They'd become washlands, areas in a floodplain that can absorb extra water. And in times of water stress they'd be an extra supply. "They would improve the landscape, and often leisure as well." Flood payments The wetlands would be surrounded by a low earth wall, or bund, and floodwater could be pumped in and retained there. Farmers would receive regular payments if they agreed to use the land less intensively. It would normally be grazed, and if a flood happened the farmers would be paid extra. Futurescapes details some of the habitats lost in the UK:
It says the cost would be about �20m ($30m) a year, on top of current nature conservation expenditure. But it believes much of this could come from better allocation of existing funds. Cheap option The report says there would be many benefits, including more and more abundant species, more opportunities for leisure, and support for local economies.
"These can enhance the quality of the countryside by breaking conservation targets rather than merely meeting them. "Our figures show that for less than 50 pence a year for every adult in Britain, we can once more enjoy the rich landscapes familiar to our forefathers." | | See also:  Internet links: The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top Sci/Tech stories now:  Links to more Sci/Tech stories are at the foot of the page. | ||||||||||||||||
|
Links to more Sci/Tech stories |
 | | ^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII|News Sources|Privacy  |
E-mail this story to a friend