| You are in: Sci/Tech | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]()
| Wednesday, 11 July, 2001, 18:08 GMT 19:08 UK Teeth and bones stir human debate ![]() The hand holds a fragment of collarbone By BBC science correspondent Christine McGourty The murky waters of human pre-history are now murkier still. An international team of scientists has discovered fossil teeth and bones from a creature they say is the earliest on our branch of the family tree. But it is not the first such claim and this latest find is sure to stir up further debate about exactly who our earliest ancestors were.
It is thought they represent at least five individuals of a new subspecies of Ardipithicus, called Ardipithecus ramidus kaddaba, that date to between 5.8 and 5.2 million years ago. Yohannes Haile-Selassie of the University of California at Berkeley, US, the scientist who discovered them, believes further fossil discoveries may prove the species to be a new one, which would be called Ardipithecus kadabba. More evidence Haile-Selassie says that distinctive features of the teeth are shared only with later hominids and have never been found in living or fossil apes, indicating that the creatures are early hominids rather than early chimpanzees or a common ancestor.
But this latest claim comes not long after fossil-hunters working in Kenya said they had found the oldest ever hominid - a six million year old creature called Orrorin tugenensis and dubbed "Millennium Man". That claim was also based on fragmentary fossils: a piece of jaw with some teeth, a fingertip, an arm and a leg bone. The scientists put Orrorin on the human line and relegated Ardipithecus to a chimpanzee ancestor. Haile-Selassie and his colleagues believe it to be the other way round. Clearly both teams cannot be right and Dr Chris Stringer of the Natural History Museum, London, UK, says more fossil evidence will be needed to resolve the issue. "The jury will have to stay out on this one at the moment," he said. "This latest discovery is very interesting, but it's very fragmentary. It's difficult to say yet whether Ardipithecus really is on the human line." Pelvic bone He said that a much more complete skeleton of Ardipithecus, including a pelvic bone, had been discovered, and when the details of that were made public it could settle the debate over whether the creature walked upright or not.
If the latest Ethiopian discovery is proved correct, the scientists believe it will require a fundamental reassessment of the origins of hominids, because the creatures lived in a forested habitat rather than the savannah. Dr Stanley Ambrose of the University of Illinois, US, who worked on the chemistry of the ancient soils accompanying the fossils, said: "The expectation was that we would find hominids in savannah grassland sites that date back to about eight million years ago. That hasn't happened. All older hominids have been found in forested environments." ![]() Looking northwest across the Middle Awash discovery site |
See also: Internet links: The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top Sci/Tech stories now: Links to more Sci/Tech stories are at the foot of the page. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more Sci/Tech stories |
| ^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII|News Sources|Privacy | ||